Non-tenured Teachers, Higher Education

  • T. CarvalhoEmail author
  • Sara Diogo
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_292-1

Synonyms

Definition

Non-tenured academics are those who have a contract with a higher education institution (HEI) without possessing or carrying a guarantee of permanent employment. Non-tenured teachers can be in a tenure track position, if they are in a probationary period leading to a tenured position, or in a non-tenure track without necessarily having a probationary period and without the possibility of obtaining tenured.

Tenured and Non-tenured Academics in Higher Education

Having a permanent position has been considered an essential characteristic of the academic profession, since it is said to allow academic freedom. In Europe, a permanent position implies that academics have the guarantee of maintaining their job, dismissal only being possible with a “just cause.” Therefore, in most European countries, the permanent position corresponds to what is known as a tenured position in the USA. The concept of tenured designates, according to the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is funded by National Funds through the FCT–Foundation for Science and Technology under the project UID/CED/00757/2013.

References

  1. Acker, S., and J.-A. Dillabough. 2007. Women ‘learning to labour’ in the ‘male emporium’: Exploring gendered work in teacher education. Gender and Education 19 (3): 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acker, Sandra, Michelle Webber, and Elizabeth Smyth. 2012. Tenure troubles and equity matters in Canadian academe. British Journal of Sociology of Education 33 (5): 743–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altbach, P. 2015. Building an academic career. In Young faculty in the twenty-first century: International perspectives, vol. 5. Albany: Suny PressGoogle Scholar
  4. American Association of University Professors, AAUP. 2017. Tenure. Retrieved from https://www.aaup.org/issues/tenure. 27 Dec 2017.
  5. Angervall, P., and D. Beach (2017). The exploitation of academic work: Women in teaching at Swedish universities. Higher Education Policy 31 (1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Angervall, P., and J. Gustafsson. 2015. Invited to Academia. Recruited for science or teaching in education sciences. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 60 (6): 663–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Angervall, P., D. Beach, and J. Gustafsson. 2015. The unacknowledged value of female academic labour power for male research careers. Higher Education Research and Development 34 (5): 815–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhopal, K., H. Brown, and J. Jackson. 2016. BME academic flight from UK to overseas higher education: Aspects of marginalisation and exclusion. British Educational Research Journal 42 (2): 240–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carvalho, Teresa, and Rui Santiago. 2010. New public management and ‘middle-management’: How do deans influence institutional policies? In The changing dynamics of higher education middle management, Higher education dynamics, ed. L. Meek, L. Goedegebuure, R. Santiago, and T. Carvalho, vol. 28, 165–196. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chait, R. 2009. The questions of tenure. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, Zhao, and Sanh-Ho Lee. 2009. Incentives in academic tenure under asymmetric information. Economic Modelling 26 (2): 300–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cross, J., and E. Goldenberg. 2011. Off-track profs: Nontenured teachers in higher education. MIT Press (BK). Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. Dobbie, D., and Robinson, I. 2008. Reorganizing higher education in the United States and Canada: The erosion of tenure and the unionization of contingent faculty. Labor Studies Journal, 33 (2): 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. El-Alayli, A., A.A. Hansen-Brown, and M. Ceynar. 2018. Dancing backwards in high heels: Female professors experience more work demands and special favor requests, particularly from academically entitled students. Sex Roles.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0872-6.
  15. Enders, J. 2001. Between state control and academic capitalism: A comparative perspective on academic staff in Europe. Westport, US. Greenwood Press, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  16. Fogg, P. 2003. So many committees, so little time. The Chronicle of Higher Education 50 (17): A14.Google Scholar
  17. Gale, H. 2011. The reluctant academic: Early career academics in a teaching orientated University. International Journal of Academic Development 16 (3): 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gentry, R., and D. Stokes. 2015. Strategies for professors who service the University to earn tenure and promotion. Research in Higher Education Journal 29 (1): 1–13.Google Scholar
  19. Hüther, O., and G. Krücken. 2016. Nested organizational fields: Isomorphism and differentiation among European universities. In The university under pressure, 53–83. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., and Salerno, C. 2008. Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher education, 56 (3): 303–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karran, T. 2007. Academic freedom in Europe: A preliminary comparative analysis. Higher Education Policy 20 (3): 289–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kingwell, M. 2009. The tenure blues. Academic matters. Ocufa’s Journal of Higher Education 13–16.Google Scholar
  23. Lassiter, Ernestine, and Jennie De Gagne. 2010. Academic freedom and tenure: Protective or destructive to academe. Journal of Globalization and Higher Education 20: 1–7.Google Scholar
  24. Liu, Mandy, and William Mallon. 2004. Tenure in transition: Trends in basic science faculty appointment policies at US medical schools. Academic Medicine 79 (3): 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mabrouk, Patricia. 2007. Promotion from associate to full professor. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 388 (5–6): 987–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mallon, William. 2001. Tenure on trial. Case studies of change in employment policies. New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  27. Monahan, Edward. 1984. Tenure and academic freedom in Canadian universities. Interchange 14/15 (4/1): 94–106.Google Scholar
  28. Musselin, Christine. 2005. European academic labor markets in transition. Higher Education 49 (1): 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Musselin, C. 2010. The impact of changing recruitment practices on academic profiles. In Academic and professional identities in higher education: The challenges of a diversifying workforce, 125–137. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Musselin, C. 2015. Long waiting lists despite minimally attractive academic positions. In Young faculty in the twenty-first century: International perspectives, 83.Google Scholar
  31. Perna, Laura. 2001. Sex and race differences in faculty tenure and promotion. Research in Higher Education 42 (5): 541–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Petersen, A.M., M. Riccaboni, and F. Pammolli. 2013. When the hunter becomes the hunted: The science of scientific careers. Lucca: IMT Institute for Advanced Studies. Retrieved from http://physics.bu.edu/~amp17/webpage_files/MyTalks/Torino_2013.pdf.
  33. Ryan, S. 2012. Academic zombies. A failure of resistance or a means of survival? Australian Universities Review 54 (2): 3–11.Google Scholar
  34. Stewart, P., M. Ornstein, and J. Drakich. 2009. Gender and promotion at Canadian universities. Canadian Review of Sociology 46 (1): 59–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tierney, William. 2002. Tenure and academic freedom in the academy: Historical parameters and new challenges. In Tenure in the sacred grove: Issues and strategies for women and minority faculty, ed. J.E. Cooper and D.D. Stevens, 57–70. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  36. Trower, Cathy, ed. 2000. Policies on faculty appointment. Standard practices and unusual arrangements. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Wagner, N.R. 2006. Getting tenure at a University. San Antonio. http://cs.utsa.edu/~wagner/creative_writing/tenure.pdf.
  38. Wattiaux, M., J. Moore, R. Rastani, and P. Crump. 2010. Excellence in teaching for promotion and tenure in animal and dairy sciences at doctoral/research universities: A faculty perspective. Journal of Dairy Science 93 (7): 3365–3376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Woods, D.R. 2006. A case for revisiting tenure requirements. Thought & Action 135–142.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Aveiro, Department of Social, Political and Territorial SciencesAveiroPortugal
  2. 2.CIPES - Research Centre on Higher Education PoliciesMatosinhosPortugal

Section editors and affiliations

  • Gaële Goastellec
    • 1
  1. 1.OSPS, LACCUSUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland