New Public Management or Neoliberalism, Higher Education

  • Ivar BleiklieEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_143-1

Synonyms

Definition

The term new public management (NPM) was coined by English and Australian public administration scholars (Hood 1991). NPM is a reform model arguing that the quality and efficiency of the civil service should be improved by introducing management techniques and practices drawn mainly from the private sector.

Neoliberalism is an ideology and policy model that emphasizes the value of free market competition. Although there is considerable debate as to the defining features of neoliberal thought and practice, it is most commonly associated with laissez-faire economics.

NPM as a Transnational Reform Ideology

In recent decades higher education (HE) reforms have been driven by many concerns: the formidable growth of HE in terms of students and number of institutions; the increasing complexity, costs, and political visibility of HE systems; as well as the rising significance...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Amaral, Alberto, Oliver Fulton, and Ingvild M. Larsen. 2003. A managerial revolution? In The higher education managerial revolution? ed. Alberto Amaral, V. Lynn Meek, and Ingvild M. Larsen. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becher, Tony, and Maurice Kogan. 1992. Process and structure in higher education. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ben-David, Joseph, and Abraham Zloczower. 1991 [1962]. Universities and academic systems in modern societies. Joseph Ben-David Scientific growth. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bleiklie, Ivar, Jürgen Enders, and Benedetto Lepori. 2015. Organizations as penetrated hierarchies. Organization Studies 36 (7): 873–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bleiklie, Ivar, Jürgen Enders, and Bendetto Lepori, eds. 2017. Managing universities – Policy and organizational change in European countries. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  6. Brunsson, Nils, and Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson. 2000. Constructing organizations: The example of the public sector reform. Organization Studies 21: 721–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, Burton R. 1998. Creating entrepreneurial universities. Oxford: IAU Press/Pergamon.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, Michael D., James G. March, and Johan P. Olsen. 1972. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dill, David, and Barbara Sporn. 1995. Emerging patterns of social demand and university reform. Oxford: IAU Press/Pergamon.Google Scholar
  10. Etzkowitz, Henry, and Loet Leydesdorff, eds. 1997. Universities and the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of university-industry-government relations. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  11. Gornitzka, Åse, Maurice Kogan, and Alberto Amaral, eds. 2005. Reform and change in higher education. Analysing policy implementation. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Guri-Rosenblidt, Sarah, Helena Sebková, and Ulrich Teichler. 2007. Massification and diversity of higher education systems. Higher Education Policy 20 (4): 373–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hood, Cristopher, Oliver James, B. Guy Peters, and Colin Scott, eds. 2004. Controlling modern government. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  14. Jonbloed, Ben, and Has Vossensteyn. 2001. Keeping up performances: An international survey of performance-based funding in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 23 (2): 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keller, George. 1983. Academic strategy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lepori, Benedetto, Martin Benninghoff, Ben Jongbloed, Carlo Salerno, and Stig Slipersæter. 2007. Changing patterns and models of higher education funding: Some empirical evidence. In Universities and strategic knowledge creation: Specialization and performance in Europe, ed. Andrea Bonaccorsi and Cinzia Daraio. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  17. Levine, Arthur. 2001. Higher education as a mature industry. In In defense of American higher education, ed. Philip G. Altbach, Patricia J. Gumport, and D. Bruce Johnstone. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lijphart, Arendt. 1999. Patterns of democracy. Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Maassen, Peter. 2003. Shifts in governance arrangements: An interpretation of the introduction of new managements structures in higher education. In The higher education managerial revolution? eds. Alberto Amaral, V. Lynn Meek, and Ingvild M. Larsen. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  20. Meyer, John W., and Francisco Ramírez. 2000. The world institutionalization of education. In Discourse formation in comparative education, ed. Jürgen Schriewer, 111–132. New York: Peter Lang Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Mohrman, Kathryn, Wanhua Ma, and David Baker. 2007. The emerging global model of the research university. In Higher education in a new century, eds. Philip G. Altbach and Patti McGill Peterson. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  22. Musselin, Christine. 2007. Are universities specific organizations? In Towards a multiversity? eds. Georg Krücken, Anna Kosmützky, and Marc Torka. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  23. Neave, Guy. 1998. The evaluative state reconsidered. European Journal of Education 33 (3): 265–284.Google Scholar
  24. Neave, Guy, and Frans A. Van Vught, eds. 1991. Prometheus bound. The changing relationship between government and higher education in Europe. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  25. Neave, Guy, and Frans A. Van Vught, eds. 1994. Government and higher education relationships across three continents. Winds of change. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  26. Olsen, Johan P. 2007. The institutional dynamics of the European university. In University dynamics and European integration, eds. Johan P. Olsen and Peter Maassen. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Painter, Martin, and B. Guy Peters. 2010. The analysis of administrative traditions. In Tradition and public administration, eds. Martin Painter and B. Guy Peters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Paradeise, Catherine, and Jean-Claude Thoenig. 2013. Academic institutions in search of quality. Organization Studies 34: 189–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Paradeise, Catherine, Emanuela Reale, Ivar Bleiklie, and Ewan Ferlie, eds. 2009. University governance. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Park, Elke. 2013. From academic governance to executive university management: Institutional governance in the eyes of academics in Europe. In The work situation of the academic profession in Europe: Findings of a survey in twelve countries, eds. Ulrich Teichler and Ester Ava Höhle. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Pollitt, Cristopher, and Geert Bouckaert. 2004. Public management reform. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Reale, Emanuela, and Marco Seeber. 2013. Instruments as empirical evidence for the analysis of higher education policies. Higher Education 65 (1): 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Seeber, Marco, Benedetto Lepori, Martina Montauti, et al. 2015. European universities as complete organizations? Public Management Review 17 (10): 1444–1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Slaughter, Sheila, and Larry L. Leslie. 1997. Academic capitalism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Teichler, Ulrich. 1988. Changing patterns of the higher education system. The experience of three decades. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  36. Verhoest, Koen, Paul G. Roness, Bram Verschure, Kristin Rubecksen, and Muiris NacCarhaigh. 2010. Autonomy and control in state agencies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weick, Karl. 1976. Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Administration and Organization TheoryUniversity of BergenBergenNorway

Section editors and affiliations

  • Alberto Amaral
    • 1
  • António Magalhães
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.CIPESUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Faculty of Psychology and Education SciencesUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  3. 3.Centre for Research in Higher Education Policies (CIPES)PortoPortugal