Multi-Level Governance, Higher Education

  • Amélia VeigaEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_133-1

Synonyms

Multi-layered governance; Polycentric governance

The idea of multi-level governance emerged in the political science and public administration literature as a model to describe the policy processes leading to European integration (Marks et al. 1996). It refers to the dispersion of authority away from the central government resulting from the reallocation of power upward (to the EU), downward (to the regions, local authorities), and sideway (to public/private networks) (Hooghe and Marks 2001). Based on the premise that European integration does not menace the autonomy of nation-states, this model challenges the state-centric governance perspective.

Multi-level governance sees European integration as a process in which authority and policy-making are shared across diverse political dimensions – subnational, national, and supranational – meaning that the locus of political control has moved out of the hands of states per se (Ansell et al. 1997). According to multi-governance,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Amaral, Alberto, and Guy Neave. 2009. On bologna, weasels and creeping competence. In European integration and the governance of higher education and research, ed. Alberto Amaral, Guy Neave, Christine Musselin, and Peter Maassen, 281–299. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansell, Christopher, Craig Parsons, and Keith A. Darden. 1997. Dual networks in European regional development policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 35 (3): 347–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, Burton. 1983. The higher education system. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dale, Roger. 2003. ‘The Lisbon declaration, the reconceptualisation of governance and the reconfiguration of European educational space. Paper presented to RAPPE seminar, ‘governance, regulation and equity in European education systems’, Institute of Education, University of London, March 20.Google Scholar
  5. Fumasoli, Tatiana. 2015. Multi-level governance in higher education research. In The Palgrave international handbook of higher education policy and governance, ed. Jeoren Huisman, Harry de Boer, David D. Dill, and Miguel Souto-Otero, 76–94. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goldsmith, Mike. 2009. Variable geometry, multi-level governance: European integration and subnational government in the new millennium. In The politics of Europeanization, ed. Kevin Featherstone and Claudio M. Radaelli, 112–133. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gornitzka, Åse. 2009. Networking administration in areas of national sensitivity: The Commission and European higher education. In European integration and the governance of higher education and research, ed. Alberto Amaral, Guy Neave, Christine Musselin, and Peter Maassen, 109–132. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Griessen, T., and D. Braun. 2010. Federal relations in higher education policy in Germany and Switzerland: Between compulsory cooperation and immobilism. Swiss Political Science Review 16 (4): 715–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hemerijck, Anton. 2002. The self-transformation of the European social model(s). Retrieved from http://www.eucenter.wisc.edu/OMC/Papers/Hemerijck.pdf
  10. Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2001. Multi-level governance and European integration. Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2010. Types of multi-level governance. In Handbook on multi-level governance, ed. H. Enderlein, S. Walti, and M. Zurn, 17–31. London: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  12. Idema, Timo. 2004. European coordination, local effects? Towards an effective implementation of the European social inclusion strategy in The Netherlands. In Europa als sociale ruimte: Open coördinatie van sociaal beleid in de Europese Unie, ed. Netherlands Council for Social Development, 177–210. The Hague: Netherlands Council for Social Development. Available from http://www.adviesorgaanrmo.nl/Publicaties/Adviezen/Europa_als_sociale_ruimte_april_2004.Google Scholar
  13. Jessop, Bob. 2004. Multi-level governance and multi-level meta-governance. In Multi-level governance, ed. I. Bache and M. Flinders, 49–74. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kjaer, Anne. 2010. Governance. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  15. Magalhães, A., A. Veiga, F.M. Ribeiro, S. Sousa, and R. Santiago. 2013. Creating a common grammar for European higher education governance. Higher Education 65 (1): 95–112.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9583-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marks, G., Hooghe, L., & Blank, K. (1996). European Integration from the 1980s: State-Centric v. Multi-level Governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), 341–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nóvoa, A., and T. Yariv-Mashal. 2004. Comparative research in education: A mode of governance or a historical journey? Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa. http://repositorio.ul.pt/bitstream/10451/680/1/21185_0305-0068_423-438.pdf
  18. Pabian, Petr. 2009. Europeanisation of higher education governance in the post-communist context: The case of the Czech Republic. In European integration and the governance of higher education and research, ed. Alberto Amaral, Guy Neave, Christine Musselin, and Peter Maassen, 257–280. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Peters, B. Guy, and Jean Pierre. 2004. Multi-level governance and democracy: A Faustian bargain? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Veiga, A. 2012. Bologna 2010.The moment of truth? European Journal of Education 47 (3): 378–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Veiga, A., and A. Magalhães. 2017. Four ‘I’s configuring European higher education governance. In Managing universities: Policy and organizational change from a western European comparative perspective, ed. I. Bleiklie, J. Enders, and B. Lepori, 191–215. Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wit, de Kurt, and Jef C. Verhoeven. 2001. The higher education policy of the European Union: With or against the member states? In Higher education and the nation state: The international dimension of higher education, ed. Jeoren Huisman, Peter Maassen, and Guy Neave, 175–231. Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  23. Zeitlin, Jonathan. 2005. Social Europe and experimental governance: Towards a new constitutional compromise? La Follette School Working Paper No. 2005-001. Retrieved from http://www.lafollette.wisc.edu/publications/workingpapers

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Psychology and Education SciencesUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Centre for Research and Intervention in Education (CIIE)PortoPortugal
  3. 3.Centre for Research in Higher Education Policies (CIPES)PortoPortugal

Section editors and affiliations

  • Alberto Amaral
    • 1
  • António Magalhães
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.CIPESUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Faculty of Psychology and Education SciencesUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  3. 3.Centre for Research in Higher Education Policies (CIPES)PortoPortugal