Skip to main content

Models of Change in Higher Education

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The International Encyclopedia of Higher Education Systems and Institutions

Synonyms

Change management

Definition

Change capability in higher education.

Introduction

Research (Anderson and Ackerman Anderson 2011) shows that around 60% of change efforts fail, with higher education providers (HEPs) no exception. The reasons for this seemingly endemic failure to cope with the management of change have been well-researched and remedies developed and offered, often commercially. Yet the failure rates remain consistent. Why? For higher education, there is no easy answer, not least as the sector as a whole is complex, involving public universities and private providers of higher education, varying widely in culture, mission, authority structures, policy, and processes. Nevertheless, analysis of some of the commonalities offers a way forward and the ways in which HEPs can build this capability form the central thrust of this chapter.

The chapter begins with a general introduction to change, change management and change capability; moves on to consider theories of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

Bibliography

  • Ackerman Anderson, L. 2010. Ten common mistakes in leading transformation. Retrieved online from http://www.beingfirst.com/resources/pdf/Prevent10Mistakes091119.pdf.

  • Change First. 2008. Building sustainable change capability. West Sussex: Change First.

    Google Scholar 

  • Change Management Institute. 2012b. Change management practitioner competencies. Retrieved online from Change Management Institute website: https://www.change-managementinstitute.com/sites/default/files/cmi_accreditation_cmpcompetencymodel.pdf.

  • Darbi, W.P. 2012. Of mission and vision statements and their potential impact on employee behaviour and attitudes: The case of a public but profit-oriented tertiary institution. International Journal of Business and Social Science 3: 95–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H., and S. Jones. 2014. The work of leadership in higher education management. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 36 (4): 367–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., and W. Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar, L., C. Marshall, and M. Bassett. 2006. Partnerships: Putting good governance principles in practice, 2–3. Ontario: Ontario Institute on Governance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. 1996. Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, I. 2007. Change in higher education: Understanding and responding to individual and organisational resistance. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 34 (2): 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezvani, S. n.d. An introduction to organizational maturity assessment: Measuring organizational capabilities. Powerpoint presentation. International public management association assessment council. Retrieved online from http://annex.ipacweb.org/library/conf/08/rezvani.pdf.

  • Seiken, J. 2013. How I got my team to fail more. Harvard Business Review. September 13, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suzanne Crew .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Crew, S., Crew, V. (2020). Models of Change in Higher Education. In: Teixeira, P.N., Shin, J.C. (eds) The International Encyclopedia of Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8905-9_547

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics