Skip to main content

Applying Medical Knowledge: Diagnosing Disease

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Abstract

The term “diagnosis” can refer to the name of a disease that afflicts a person or to the process of determining a diagnosis in the first sense. Complex philosophical, metaphysical, epistemological, normative, and logical issues permeate all aspects of diagnosis, beginning with the question of what is being diagnosed. The nature of disease is philosophically controverted. Both ontological and physiological conceptions of disease continue to influence thinking about disease and hence how to diagnose it. The question of whether the concept of disease is essentially value laden remains open. Diagnosis presupposes some classification of diseases, known as a nosology, in order to distinguish one disease from another. There are many possible ways to classify diseases, and nosologies can have different goals, e.g., providing a basis for rational treatment and prognosis, enabling statistical reporting, fostering research, and for administrative aspects of health care. The major elements of the diagnostic process include the history of the illness, the physical examination, and various kinds of laboratory and clinical testing. Each of these elements requires interpretation and is influenced by philosophical presuppositions. Diagnostic reasoning makes use of probabilistic, causal, and deterministic models. It is fundamentally a process of hypothesis formation about possible diagnoses (differential diagnosis) and the systematic confirmation and ruling out of possibilities until one diagnosis is judged best to explain all the data. Diagnosing disease is important for a broad array of medical and social reasons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Bickley LS, Szilagyi PG (2013) Bates’ guide to physical examination and history taking, 11th edn. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott William and Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Boorse C (1997) A rebuttal on health. In: Humber JM, Almeder RF (eds) What is disease? Humana Press, Totowa, pp 3–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley GW (1993) Disease, diagnosis and decisions. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornet R, deKeiser N (2008) Forty years of SNOMED: a literature review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 8(suppl 1):S2. Available via http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/8/S1/S2. Accessed 24 June 2014

  • Cutter MAG (2003) Reframing disease contextually. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de la Croix B, de Sauvages F (1768) Nosologia methodica sistens morborum classes juxta Sydenhami mentem et botanicorum ordinem. Fratrum de Tournes, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Elstein AS, Shulman L, Sprafka SA (1978) Medical problem solving: an analysis of clinical reasoning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt HT Jr (1975) The concepts of health and disease. In: Engelhardt HT, Spicker SF (eds) Evaluation and explanation in the biomedical sciences. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 125–141

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt HT Jr (1981) Clinical judgment. Metamedicine 2:301–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein AR (1973a) An analysis of diagnostic reasoning. I. The domains and disorders of clinical macrobiology. Yale J Biol Med 46:212–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein AR (1973b) An analysis of diagnostic reasoning. II. The strategy of intermediate decisions. Yale J Biol Med 46:264–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein AR (1974) An analysis of diagnostic reasoning. III. The construction of clinical algorithms. Yale J Biol Med 47:5–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann B (2001) Complexity of the concept of disease as shown through rival theoretical frameworks. Theor Med Bioeth 22:211–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter KM (1991) Doctor’s stories: the narrative structure of medical knowledge. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • IHTSDO (2014a) Welcome to IHTSDO. Available via http://www.ihtsdo.org. Accessed 25 June 2014

  • IHTSDO (2014b) History of SNOMED CT. Available via http://www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct/history0. Accessed 25 June 2014

  • IHTSDO (2014c) Introducing SNOMED CT, the global clinical terminology. Available via http://ihtsdo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/doc/download/doc_StarterGuide_Current-en-US_INT_20140222.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2014

  • Jablensky A (2012) The nosological entity in psychiatry: a historical illusion or a moving target? In: Kendler KS, Parnas J (eds) Philosophical issues in psychiatry II: nosology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 77–94

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1982) Variants of uncertainty. Cognition 11:143–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassirer JP (1989) Diagnostic reasoning. Ann Intern Med 110:893–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laennec R (1982) Traite d’anatomie patholigique. In: Boulle L, Grmek MD, Lupovici C, Samion-Contet J (eds) Laennec: catalogue des manuscrits scientifiques. Masson et Fondation Singer-Polignac, Paris, ms 2186 (III)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazare A, Putnam SM, Lipkin M (1995) Three functions of the medical interview. In: Lipkin M, Putnam SM, Lazare A (eds) The medical interview: clinical care, education, and research. Springer, New York, pp 3–19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • LeBlond RF, Brown DD, DeGowin RL (2009) DeGowin’s diagnostic examination, 9th edn. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy E (1997) The logic of medicine, 2nd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordenfelt L (1995) On the nature of health: an action-theoretic approach, 2nd rev and enlarged ed. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Reznek L (1987) The nature of disease. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadegh-Zadeh K (2012) Handbook of analytic philosophy of medicine. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stempsey WE (2000) Disease and diagnosis: value-dependent realism. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sydenham T (1979) The works of Thomas Sydenham, MD, from the Latin edition of Dr. Greenhill, with a life of the author by Latham, RG, facsimile of the Sydenham Society’s two-volume edition of 1848–1850, Classics of Medicine Library, Birmingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Temkin O (1963) The scientific approach to disease: specific entity and individual sickness. In: Crombie AC (ed) Scientific change: historical studies in the intellectual, social and technical conditions for scientific discovery and technical invention, from antiquity to the present. Basic Books, New York, pp 629–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Temkin O (1973) Health and disease. In: Wiener P (ed) Dictionary of the history of ideas: studies of selected pivotal ideas, vol 2. Scribner’s, New York, pp 395–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1982) Judgment under uncertainty. In: Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (eds) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Virchow RLK (1958) Disease, life, and man: selected essays. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2010) International statistical classification of disease and related health problems, 10th rev, 2010 ed, 3 vols. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulff HR (1976) Rational diagnosis and treatment. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William E. Stempsey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Stempsey, W.E. (2015). Applying Medical Knowledge: Diagnosing Disease. In: Schramme, T., Edwards, S. (eds) Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8706-2_31-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8706-2_31-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8706-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics