Abstract
In this chapter, I examine the relationship between institutions and moral or ethical values (I use the terms interchangeably) and, in particular, the manner and extent to which such values are or, at least, ought to be part and parcel of the design of institutions. By institutions I mean organizations and systems of organizations. So a single business corporation is an institution in this sense, and so is a market-based industry comprised of corporations. When designing-for-values to institutions, three dimensions of institutions can be considered, namely, function, structure, and culture. Moreover, there are different (possibly crosscutting) levels: the macro-level (e.g., the industry as a whole), mezzo-level (e.g., a single organization), and the microlevel (e.g., an anti-corruption system within an organization). Further, there are at least six main sources of motivation to be accommodated, and potentially utilized, in the design process. These are formal sanctions (within a framework of enforced rules), economic incentives (especially within a competitive market), desire for status and reputation, desire for control over one’s own destiny and (in some cases) power over others, moral motivations, and a miscellaneous assemblage of psychosocial factors, e.g., status quo bias, overconfidence, desire to conform, and irrational desires. To illustrate and facilitate understanding of designing-for-value to institutions, I will discuss different features of a variety of quite diverse contemporary institutions. The institutions and design features in question are (respectively) (1) the design and construction of an entire organizational system from the ground up, namely, a compulsory retirement income system (a hybrid public/private sector institution); (2) the redesign and renovation of an anti-corruption system for existing police organizations (public sector institution); (3) the design and construction of a reputational index for organizations competing in a market as one element of a broad-based cultural-change process for the industries in question; and (4) the redesign of disclosure requirements for credit card pricing mechanisms.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Cooper J (2012) The “Cooper” review. http://www.supersystemreview.gov.au/content/content.aspx?doc=html/final_report.htm. Accessed 21 May 2012
Fung A (2003) Survey article: recipes for public spheres: eight institutional design choices and their consequences. J Polit Philos 11(3):338–367
Goodin RE (ed) (1998) The theory of institutional design. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Miller S (2010) The moral foundations of social institutions: a study in applied philosophy. Cambridge University Press, New York
Searle JR (1995) The construction of social reality. Penguin, London
Thaler R, Sunstein C (2008) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven
Van den Hoven J, Miller S, Pogge T (2015) Designing-in-ethics: technology and institutions. Cambridge University Press, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Miller, S. (2014). Design for Values in Institutions. In: van den Hoven, J., Vermaas, P., van de Poel, I. (eds) Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6994-6_27-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6994-6_27-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6994-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities