Design Methods in Design for Values

  • Pieter E. Vermaas
  • Paul Hekkert
  • Noëmi Manders-Huits
  • Nynke Tromp
Living reference work entry


In this chapter we demonstrate that contemporary design methodology provides methods for design for moral values. Subsequently, we explore the methodological challenges and problems that this brings to the table. First, we show that contemporary design methods are aimed at realizing values of users and society. These values are in general not moral ones yet do include in specific cases moral values. Second, we introduce a division between user-driven methods in which it are the users who introduce the values to be designed for and designer-driven methods in which the clients and designers are introducing these values. Third, we discuss two designer-driven design methods in detail for, respectively, design in general and social design in particular: the Vision in Product design method and the Social Implication Design method. Finally, we explore the challenges and problems of design for moral values with these and other design methods. We focus specifically on the designer who, once design is recognized as design for moral values, becomes responsible for the moral values the resulting products have. We argue that in this case the designer should make the moral values of products transparent to clients and users.


Design methods Design for moral values Designer-driven design methods 


  1. Borgmann A (1984) Technology and the character of contemporary life: a philosophical inquiry. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown T (2009) Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Business, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Burns C, Cottam H, Vanstone C, Winhall J (2006) Transformation design. RED Paper Design Council, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Cross N (2006) Designerly ways of knowing. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Desmet PMA, Hekkert P (2007) Framework of product experience. Int J Des 1(1):57–66Google Scholar
  6. Dorst K (2007) Design problems and design paradoxes. Des Issues 22(3):4–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ehrenfeld JR (2008) Sustainability by design: a subversive strategy for transforming our consumer culture. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  8. Fokkinga SF, Desmet PMA (2012) Darker shades of Joy: the role of negative emotion in rich product experiences. Des Issues 28(4):42–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedman B, Kahn PH, Borning A (2002) Value sensitive design: theory and methods. University of Washington technical report, 02-12Google Scholar
  10. Hekkert P, Van Dijk M (2011) Vision in design: a guidebook for innovators. BIS Publishers, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  11. Joerges B (1999) Do politics have artefacts? Soc Stud Sci 29:411–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Manzini E, Rizzo F (2011) Small projects/large changes: participatory design as an open participated process. CoDes Int J CoCreat Dese Arts 7(3–4):199–215Google Scholar
  13. McDonough W, Braungart M (2002) Cradle to cradle: remaking the way we make things. North Point Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Nielsen J (1994) Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  15. Norman DA (1988) The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Nussbaum MC (2011) Creating capabilities: the human development approach. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ozkaramanli D, Desmet PMA (2012) I knew i shouldn’t, yet i did It again! emotion-driven design as a means to motivate subjective well-being. Int J Des 6(1):27–39Google Scholar
  18. Pahl G, Beitz W, Feldhusen J, Grote K-H (2007) Engineering design: a systematic approach, 3rd edn. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Plattner H, Meinel C, Weinberg U (2009) Design thinking: innovation Lernen – Ideenwelten Öffnen. mi-Wirtschaftsbuch, MunichGoogle Scholar
  20. Saco RM, Goncalves AP (2008) Service design: an appraisal. Des Manag Rev 19(1):10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sanders EB-N, Stappers PJ (2008) Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDes Int J CoCreat Des Arts 4(1):5–18Google Scholar
  22. Sangiorgi D (2011) Transformative services and transformation design. Int J Des 5(2):29–40Google Scholar
  23. Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Temple Smith, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Anchor Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Sleeswijk-Visser F (2009) Bringing the everyday life of people into design. Industrial design. Delft University of Technology, DelftGoogle Scholar
  26. Tromp N, Hekkert P (2010) A clash of concerns: applying design thinking to social dilemmas. In: DTRS8, Sydney, DAB documentsGoogle Scholar
  27. Tromp N, Hekkert P (2014) Social Implication Design (SID) – a design method to exploit the unique value of the artefact to counteract social problems. In: Proceedings DRS14, UmeaGoogle Scholar
  28. Tromp N, Hekkert P, Verbeek P-P (2011) Design for socially responsible behaviour: a classification of influence based on intended user experience. Des Issues 27(3):3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Verbeek P-P (2011) Moralizing technology: understanding and designing the morality of things. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vermaas P, Kroes P, van de Poel I, Franssen M, Houkes W (2011) A philosophy of technology: from technical artefacts to sociotechnical systems, vol 6, Synthesis lectures on engineers, technology and society. Morgan & Claypool, San Rafael, CAGoogle Scholar
  31. Whitney P, Kelkar A (2004) Designing for the base of the pyramid. Des Manag Rev 3:41–47Google Scholar
  32. Winner L (1980) Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109:121–136Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pieter E. Vermaas
    • 1
  • Paul Hekkert
    • 2
  • Noëmi Manders-Huits
    • 1
  • Nynke Tromp
    • 2
  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentTU DelftDelftNetherlands
  2. 2.Department of Industrial Design, Design AestheticsTU DelftDelftNetherlands

Personalised recommendations