Skip to main content

Authority of Law

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy

The First Thread of the Web: Grasping the Question

Law transforms our lives in the most important way: it changes how we act and because of this it gives rise to fundamental questions. One such question concerns legal authority and individual autonomy and asks: if we are autonomous agents how do legislators, judges and officials have legitimate authority to change our actions and indirectly change how we conduct our lives? We conceive ourselves as active agents who determine how and when to act, and we conceive ourselves as the planners of our own lives and the creators of change. Law asks us, however, to perform actions that range from the trivial to the complex. But how is it possible for me to do, in full awareness, as the law asks and, at the same time, be in control of my own destiny? How is my free will affected by the law?

But how is this possible when I am simply trying to conform with what the law says? This means, I am trying to follow what the law says without giving much...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I will use ‘reasons in action’ and ‘reasons for action’ interchangeably. At the end of the book it will become clear the reason for this interchange of terminology.

  2. 2.

    For some exceptions, see Velleman (1989).

  3. 3.

    The notion of paradigm follows the idea of core-resemblance that is defended in my article Rodriguez-Blanco (2007).

  4. 4.

    Rodriguez-Blanco (2014), paperback edition 2016.

  5. 5.

    This interpretation is also advocated by Reath (2006) and Wood (2008).

  6. 6.

    For a criticism of this interpretation of “practical syllogism” Rodriguez-Blanco (2014), at §4.2.1.

  7. 7.

    A version of this argument can be found in Finnis (1980).

  8. 8.

    Rodriguez-Blanco (2014), at §4.1 and §4.2.

  9. 9.

    This point has been emphasised by Dancy (2002). In contemporary debates this conception was first advanced by Raz (1999b).

  10. 10.

    See especially Frede (2011).

  11. 11.

    See Wood (2008) for a critique of the constructivist reading of Kant.

  12. 12.

    See Reath (2006); Korsgaard (1996) and Rawls for a constructivist reading of Kant, Rawls (1971, 1980).

  13. 13.

    Wood argues that Kant’s .view concerning the objectivity of principles should be understood along realist lines.

References

  • Christiano T (2004) The authority of democracy. In: Journal of Political Philosophy, pp 245–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Dancy J (2002) Practical reality. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edmundson W (1998) Three anarchical fallacies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Estlund D (2007) Democratic authority. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnis J (1980) Natural law and natural rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Frede M (2011) A free will: origins of the notion in ancient thought. University of California Press, Berkeley/Los Angeles. Long AA, Sedley D (eds)

    Google Scholar 

  • Green L (1989) The authority of the state. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd H (2001) Moral combat. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (2002) Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. (trans: Zweig A and eds Hill TR, Zweig A). Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard C (1996) Creating the kingdom of ends. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill O (1989) Constructions of reasons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 75–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1980) Kantian constructivism in moral theory. J Philos 77:515

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz J (1986) The morality of freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz J (ed) (1990) Authority. New York University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz J (1999a) Engaging reason. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 67

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz J (1999b) Practical reason and norms. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 17; (originally published in 1975 by Hutchinsonn & co.)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reath A (2006) Agency and autonomy in Kant’s moral theory. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Blanco V (2007) Is finnis wrong? Leg Theory 13:257

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Blanco V (2014) Law and authority under the guise of the good. Hart, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Velleman D (1989) Practical reflection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff RP (1970) In defense of anarchism. Harper Torchbooks, New York/London, p 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff RP (1973) The autonomy of reason. Harper Torchbooks, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood A (2008) Kantian ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Rodriguez-Blanco, V. (2018). Authority of Law. In: Sellers, M., Kirste, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_377-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_377-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics