Skip to main content

Deontic Logic and Legal Rules

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy

Introduction: The Concept of Deontic Logic

Deontic logic is a branch of logic that studies normative concepts such as obligation (“ought”), permission (“may”), prohibition (“may not”), and other related notions (“optional,” “good,” “bad,” “claim,” “power,” “liberty,” “immunity,” “supererogatory,” “blameworthy,” “praiseworthy,” etc.). It investigates the logical features of these concepts, as well as the logical relations among propositions that contain them as their essential constituents. Deontic logic is also concerned with the study of norms, normative systems, and different forms of normative reasoning. That is why it is considered to be particularly relevant for investigating the logical aspects of law, ethics, and other fields in which this kind of reasoning plays a prominent role (see Hilpinnen 1981, 2002; McNamara 2006; Von Wright 1951, 1999).

The origin of the term “deontic” can be traced back to the Greek word “δέον” (gen. δέοντος), which may be translated as “duly,” “as it...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alchourrón CE, Bulygin E (1971) Normative systems. Springer, Vienna

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alchourrón CE, Bulygin E (1989) Von Wright on deontic logic and the philosophy of law. In: Schlipp PA, Hahn LE (eds) The philosophy of Georg Henrik von Wright. Open Court, La Salle, pp 665–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage J (2005) Studies in legal logic. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J (2006) The paradoxes of deontic logic: alive and kicking. Theoria 72(3):221–232. doi:10.1111/j.1755-2567.2006.tb00958.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J, Pigozzi G, van der Torre, L (2007) Ten philosophical problems in deontic logic http://www.pigozzi.org/TenPhilProblemsDL.pdf. Accessed 6 Sep 2017.

  • Hansson SO (2013) The varieties of permission. In: Gabbay D, Horty J, Parent X, van der Meyden R, van der Torre L (eds) Handbook of deontic logic and normative systems. College Publications, London, pp 195–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilpinnen R (ed) (1981) Deontic logic: introductory and systematic readings, 2nd edn. D Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilpinen R (2001) Deontic Logic. In: Goble L (ed) The Blackwell guide to philosophical logic. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 159–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilpinnen R (2002) Deontic, epistemic and temporal modal logics. In: Jacquette D (ed) A companion to philosophical logic. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 491–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilpinen R, McNamara P (2013) Deontic logic: a historical survey and introduction. In: Gabbay D, Horty J, Parent X, van der Meyden R, van der Torre L (eds) Handbook of deontic logic and normative systems. College Publications, London, pp 3–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones AJI (1990) Deontic logic and legal knowledge representation. Ratio Juris 3(2):237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen J (1937) Imperatives and logic. Erkenntnis 7(1):288–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuuttila S (1981) The emergence of deontic logic in the fourteenth century. In: Hilpinen R (ed) New studies in deontic logic: norms, actions and the foundations of ethics. D Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, pp 225–248

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzarese T (1991) Deontic logic as logic of legal norms: two main sources of problems. Ratio Juris 4(3):374–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara P (2006) Deontic logic. In: Gabbay DM, Woods J (eds) Handbook of the history of logic vol. 7 – logic and the modalities in the twentieth century. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 197–288

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro PE, Rodríguez JL (2014) Deontic logic and legal systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Opałek K, Woleński J (1991) Normative systems, permission and deontic logic. Ratio Juris 4(3):334–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakken H, Sartor G (2015) Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective. http://www.cs.uu.nl/groups/IS/archive/henry/ReviewLogicAndLawRevised.pdf. Accessed 9 Nov 2016

  • Royakkers LMM (1998) Extending deontic logic for the formalisation of legal rules. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soeteman A (1989) Logic in law: remarks on logic and rationality in normative reasoning, especially in law. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Von Wright GH (1951) Deontic logic. Mind 60(237):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Wright GH (1963) Norm and action: a logical enquiry. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Wright GH (1968) An essay in deontic logic and the general theory of action. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Wright GH (1991) Is there a logic of norms? Ratio Juris 4(3):265–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Wright GH (1999) Deontic logic: a personal view. Ratio Juris 12(1):26–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Dimishkovska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Dimishkovska, A. (2017). Deontic Logic and Legal Rules. In: Sellers, M., Kirste, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_228-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_228-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics