Scorpion Venom Gland Transcriptomics
For decades, the study of venomous animals has focused on the isolation and biochemical characterization of specific venom components that have medical or biotechnological importance. Indeed, scorpions have been extensively studied under this optics, which has led to the identification of hundreds of different transcripts encoding toxic peptides. However, scorpions are interesting organisms not only because of their toxin diversity but also because they represent the most ancient terrestrial animals that fossil records have identified. About 2,000 species have been described around the world, which also implies that scorpions are extremely well-adapted arthropods that have managed to survive in different environmental conditions. Even though the divergence timing of scorpions places them as interesting model organisms for evolutionary inferences, little is known about the genomic organization, speciation events, and population dynamics of these arthropods.
Different “omic” approaches have become a very powerful strategy for understanding the complexity of venomous animals. Transcriptomics, in particular, has been widely used to explore the transcriptional diversity of venom glands of several scorpion species. Recently, high-throughput sequencing platforms have substantially improved our capacity to describe biological features of scorpions but, most importantly, have outlined new directions toward a more complete understanding of the evolution of these arthropods.
In this chapter, those transcriptomic strategies followed in the last two decades that went from cDNA cloning to next-generation sequencing methods will be described. Some biological and evolutionary questions about scorpion speciation and venom diversification will also be addressed. Finally, an attempt to raise some future directions in the field will be made.
KeywordscDNA Library cDNA Library Construction Venom Gland Scorpion Venom Scorpion Toxin
- Almeida DD, Scortecci KC, Kobashi LS, Agnez-Lima LF, Medeiros SR, Silva-Junior AA. Junqueira-de-Azevedo I de L, Fernandes-Pedrosa M de F. Profiling the resting venom gland of the scorpion Tityus stigmurus through a transcriptomic survey. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:362.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Benkhadir K, Kharrat R, Cestele S, Mosbah A, Rochat H, El Ayeb M, Karoui H. Molecular cloning and functional expression of the alpha-scorpion toxin BotIII: pivotal role of the C-terminal region for its interaction with voltage-dependent sodium channels. Peptides. 2004;25:151–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brenner S, Johnson M, Bridgham J, Golda G, Lloyd DH, Johnson D, Luo S, McCurdy S, Foy M, Ewan M, Roth R, George D, Eletr S, Albrecht G, Vermaas E, Williams SR, Moon K, Burcham T, Pallas M, DuBridge RB, Kirchner J, Fearon K, Mao J, Corcoran K. Gene expression analysis by massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS) on microbead arrays. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18(6):630–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De Sousa L, Borges A, Vásquez-Suárez A, Op den Camp HJ, Chadee-Burgos RI, Romero-Bellorín M, Espinoza J, De Sousa-Insana L, Pino-García O. Differences in venom toxicity and antigenicity between females and males Tityus nororientalis (Buthidae) scorpions. J Venom Res. 2010;21(1):61–70.Google Scholar
- Diego-García E, Schwartz EF, D’Suze G, Roman-Gonzalez SA, Batista CV, Garcia BI. Rodriguez de la Vega R, Possani LD. Wide phylogenetic distribution of Scorpine and long-chain beta-KTx-like peptides in scorpion venoms: identification of “orphan” components. Peptides. 2007;28:31–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Durban J, Pérez A, Sanz L, Gómez A, Bonilla F, Rodríguez S, Chacón D, Sasa M, Angulo Y, Gutiérrez JM, Calvete JJ. Integrated “omics” profiling indicates that miRNAs are modulators of the ontogenetic venom composition shift in the Central American rattlesnake, Crotalus simus simus. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:234.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fet V, Gantenbei B, Gromov AV, Lowe G, Lourenço WR. The first molecular phylogeny of Buthidae (Scorpiones). Euscorpius. 2003;4:1–10.Google Scholar
- Liu L, Li Y, Li S, Hu N, He Y, Pong R, Lin D, Lu L, Law M. Comparison of next-generation sequencing systems. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:251364.Google Scholar
- Luna-Ramírez K, Quintero-Hernández V, Vargas-Jaimes L, Batista CV, Winkel KD, Possani LD. Characterization of the venom from the Australian scorpion Urodacus yaschenkoi: molecular mass analysis of components, cDNA sequences and peptides with antimicrobial activity. Toxicon. 2013;63:44–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen YJ, Chen Z, Dewell SB, Du L, Fierro JM, Gomes XV, Godwin BC, He W, Helgesen S, Ho CH, Irzyk GP, Jando SC, Alenquer ML, Jarvie TP, Jirage KB, Kim JB, Knight JR, Lanza JR, Leamon JH, Lefkowitz SM, Lei M, Li J, Lohman KL, Lu H, Makhijani VB, McDade KE, McKenna MP, Myers EW, Nickerson E, Nobile JR, Plant R, Puc BP, Ronan MT, Roth GT, Sarkis GJ, Simons JF, Simpson JW, Srinivasan M, Tartaro KR, Tomasz A, Vogt KA, Volkmer GA, Wang SH, Wang Y, Weiner MP, Yu P, Begley RF, Rothberg JM. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature. 2005;437:376–80.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zeng XC, Wang S, Nie Y, Zhang L, Luo X. Characterization of BmKbpp, a multifunctional peptide from the Chinese scorpion Mesobuthus martensii Karsch: gaining insight into a new mechanism for the functional diversification of scorpion venom peptides. Peptides. 2012;33:44–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar