Advertisement

Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: A Selective View of Toxins in Weapons and Medicine.

  • Barbara B. Saunders-Price
Living reference work entry

Abstract

A look at the past and a look at the future. What is the history of toxins used as weapons and where is the danger in the future?

Before 2001, there was recognition that biological weapons, including toxins, were weapons that required state sponsorship. But that is no longer true. As the asymmetries of weapons and politics have changed, so has the probable use of toxins as weapons. Our understanding and expectation of likely use of toxins in weapons has changed. Even the word toxin is commonly used inappropriately to mean toxic chemical rather than a chemical produced by organisms. The possibility of toxin use in weapons was evaluated on whether the toxin could be manufactured or purified from natural resources. The more complicated the toxin’s structure, the less likely it was to be purified or created using laboratory synthesis. Many infectious disease specialists regard toxins as the eventual cause of the destruction of cells in most bacterial infections.

In the spectrum of chemical and biological weapons, from the simple chemical structures of mustard and sarin to the complicated toxins, such as palytoxin, where do toxin weapons fit? Does the use of toxins as a weapon imply the use of biological weapons or, if the toxin is laboratory synthesized and purified is it a chemical weapon? Do toxin weapons need to have purified chemicals? Are toxins the ultimate dual use agents? Do toxinologists need to examine their research and publications for the potential of possible illicit use? Do restrictions on research and publication of biologically based materials, including toxins, really impede the development of weapons? How can these restrictions be implemented to guarantee security concerns?

Keywords

Snake Venom Bacterial Toxin Chemical Weapon Biological Weapon Biological Warfare 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Al-Shamy G, Sawaya R. Novel therapies for brain tumors. In: Gildenberg P, Lozano A, Tasker R, editors. Textbook of stereotactic and functional neurosurgery: Springer Reference (2009). www.springerreference.com. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. doi:10.1007/SpringerReference_143596. Accessed 31 Jan 2011 23:00:00 UTC
  2. Brinkman D. Box jellyfish toxins: investigating novel protein structure and function (2007). http://www.hermonslade.org.au/projects/HSF_10_4/hsf_10_4.html. Accessed 10 July 2013.
  3. Brinkman D, Burnell J. Identification, cloning and sequencing of two major venom proteins from the box jellyfish, Chironex fleckeri. Toxicon. 2007;50:850–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chemical Weapons Convention. http://www.opcw.org/chemical-weapons-convention/download-the-cwc/. Accessed 11 July 2013.
  5. Christopher GW et al. Biological warfare a historical perspective. JAMA. 1997;278:412–7, http://www2a.cdc.gov/nip/isd/spoxclincian/contents/references/BioWarfareHistory.pdf
  6. Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. ENTRY INTO FORCE: 26 March 1975. http://www.opcw.org/chemical-weapons-convention/related-international-agreements/chemical-warfare-and-chemical-weapons/the-biological-and-toxin-weapons-convention/ (1972). Accessed 17 June 2013.
  7. Globalsecurity.org. http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/intro/bio_tox.htm. Accessed 11 July 2013.
  8. Green ST et al. Undergraduate teaching on biological weapons and bioterrorism at medical schools in the UK and the Republic of Ireland: results of a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2013 – PubMed – NCBI, 2013. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23794539
  9. MacKenzie D. Scaring ourselves stupid. New Sci. 2013;220(2937):26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Magnuson B. Natural toxins in food plants. University of Idaho, Department of Food Science and Toxicology (1997). http://extoxnet.orst.edu/faqs/natural/plant1.htm. Accessed 10 July 2013.
  11. Mazor J. Environmental ethics. In: Freedman B, editor. Global environmental change: Springer Reference (2012). www.springerreference.com. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. doi:10.1007/SpringerReference_305236. Accessed 16 Nov 2012 07:47:56 UTC
  12. NIH. Bioethics resources on the Web. http://bioethics.od.nih.gov/bioethicsjournals.html. Accessed 8 Nov 2013.
  13. NLM. National Library of Medicine profiles in science: the Albert Szent-Gyorgyi papers. http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/ps/retrieve/Narrative/WG/p-nid/149. Accessed 26 Sept 2013.
  14. Pearson G. The CBW spectrum. ASA Newsl. 1990;90–1.Google Scholar
  15. Rojnuckarin P. Snake venom and hemostasis. In: Gopalakrishnakone P, editor. Handbook of toxinology. Clinical Toxinology: Springer Reference (2013). www.springerreference.com. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. doi:10.1007/SpringerReference_367328. Accessed 12 July 2013 23:07:24 UTC
  16. Szent-Gyorgyi A (M.D., Ph.D., Nobel Laureate for Medicine). The crazy ape. The Universal Library; 1970. http://www.allaboutlife.com/the-crazy-ape/. Accessed 11 July 2013.
  17. Thinkquest. Poisonous plants and animals. http://library.thinkquest.org/C007974/4cla.htm. Accessed 10 July 2013.
  18. Todar’s Online Textbook of Bacteriology, http://textbookofbacteriology.net/proteintoxins.html. Accessed 10 July 2013.
  19. Toxin definition. http://www.merriam-webster.com/. Accessed 8 Nov 2013.
  20. Toxin Targeting. In: Rédei G, editor. Encyclopedia of genetics, genomics, proteomics and informatics: Springer Reference (2008). www.springerreference.com. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2008. URL: http://www.springerreference.com/docs/html/chapterdbid/107545.html. Accessed 31 Jan 2011 23:00:00 UTC
  21. United States Code; Title 18, Crimes and criminal procedure; Chapter 10, Biological weapons; section 178, definitions 10 Jan 2012. http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/18C10.txt. Accessed 14 July 2013.
  22. United States government policy for institutional oversight of life sciences dual use research of concern. A notice by the science and technology policy office on 22 Feb 2013 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23794539
  23. US DURC. Dual use research of concern: the March 29 policy (2012). http://oba.od.nih.gov/oba/biosecurity/meetings/Nov2012/NSABB_Meeting_Jones_March_29_Policy_slides.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ASA Inc.KaneoheUSA

Personalised recommendations