Introduction
Conventionalism may be characterized as a position according to which a certain fact is (or is determined by) a convention. In other words, a conventionality thesis contains two main elements: a concept of convention and a particular, purportedly conventional, fact. Hence, in order to work out a particular conventionalist proposal it is necessary to offer an account of conventions and an account of the fact under analysis.
In the legal domain, even if it can be traced back to the conventionalist political philosophies of Hobbes and Hume, conventionalism has been framed following Herbert Hart’s insights about the concept of law. As we know, Hart argued that a necessary condition for there to be a legal system is the existence of a social practice between judges regarding the identification of law – famously known as “rule of recognition” (Hart 1961). Legal conventionalism purports to strengthen Hart’s original proposal by replacing the concept of social practice with the...
References
Arena FJ (2014) El convencionalismo jurídico. Un recorrido analítico, Marcial Pons, Madrid
Bayón Mohino JC (2002) Derecho, convencionalismo y controversia. In: Navarro PE, Redondo MC (eds) La relevancia del derecho. Gedisa, Barcelona, pp 57–92
Blackburn S (1998) Ruling passions. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Bulygin E (1976) Sobre la regla de reconocimiento. Derecho, filosofía y lenguaje. Astrea, Buenos Aires
Bulygin E (2006) El positivismo jurídico. Fontamara, Mexico
Burge T (1975) On knowledge and convention. Philos Rev 84(2):249–255
Caracciolo R (2009) El derecho desde la filosofía: ensayos. El Derecho y la Justicia. Centro de Estudios Politicos y Constitucionales, Madrid
Celano B (2010/1997) Interazione strategica e convenzione. Fatti istituzionali, consuetudini, convenzioni. Aracne, Roma
Celano B (2014) Consuetudine: un’analisi concettuale. Diritto e Questioni Pubbliche 14:597–667
Coleman JL (1982) Negative and positive positivism. J Leg Stud 11(1):139–164
Coleman JL (2001a/1998) Incorporationism, conventionality and the practical difference thesis. In: Coleman JL (ed) Hart’s postscript. essays on the postscript to “The concept of law”. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, pp 99–148
Coleman JL (2001b) The conventionality thesis. Philos Issues 11(1):354–387
den Hartogh G (1998) A conventionalist theory of obligation. Law Philos 17(4):351–376
den Hartogh G (2002) Mutual expectations. A conventionalist theory of law. Kluwer, La Haya
Dickson J (2007) Is the rule of recognition really a conventional rule? Oxf J Leg Stud 27(3):373–402
Dworkin R (1978) Taking rights seriously. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Dworkin R (1986) Law’s Empire. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, UK
Gilbert M (1993) Is an agreement an exchange of promises? J Philos 90(12):627–649
Gilbert M (2008) Social convention revisited. Topoi 27(1/2):5–16
Green L (1999) Positivism and conventionalism. Can J Law Jurisprud 12(1):35–52
Hart HLA (1961) The concept of law. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Hart HLA (1994/1961) The concept of law. Clarendon law series, II edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Jamieson D (1975) David Lewis on convention. Can J Philos 5:73–81
Kekes J (1993) The morality of pluralism. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Kyritsis D (2008) What is good about legal conventionalism? Leg Theory 14(2):135–166
Lagerspetz E (1995) The opposite mirrors. An essay on the conventionalist theory of institutions. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Lewis D (1969) Convention. A philosophical study. Basil Blackwell, Oxford
Marmor A (2009) Social conventions. From language to law. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Miller S (1992) On conventions. Australas J Philos 70(4):435–444
Postema G (1982) Coordination and convention at the foundation of law. J Leg Stud 11(1):165–203
Postema G (1987) The normativity of law. In: Gavison R (ed) Issues in contemporary legal philosophy. The influence of H.L.A. Hart. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 81–104
Rawls J (1955) Two concepts of rules. Philos Rev 64(1):3–32
Raz J (1984) On the nature of rights. Mind 93(370):194–214
Ross A (1968) Directives and norms. Routledge and Keagan Paul, Londres
Searle JR (1969) Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Science + Business Media B.V., Dordrecht.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Arena, F.J. (2023). Conventionalism. In: Sellers, M., Kirste, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_101
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_101
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6518-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6519-1
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences