Fertility of Immigrants
Fertility and immigration is a subject area of demography and population studies, investigating how the fertility behavior of immigrants and their descendents is influenced by the migration process and the sending and resettlement environments.
Immigration affects the size and composition of the population directly and indirectly, through childbearing. Understanding the ways in which resettlement and adaptation to the socioeconomic and cultural context of the receiving country may influence the fertility of immigrants and that of their descendants is of interest to minority group integration processes and of practical value for ethnic population projections. Because fertility is a major characteristic of immigrant groups – reflecting on socioeconomic and cultural norms – changes in childbearing behavior can serve as indicators of assimilation and integration processes of immigrants and ethnic minority groups. The fertility and immigration subject area...
KeywordsImmigrant Group Fertility Behavior Hispanic Immigrant Fertility Differential Assimilation Theory
Refers to the number of live births to females in a particular age category in a particular year compared to the number of females in that age category. Most commonly 1 and 5 years age categories are used.
CEB to women in a particular age group is the mean number of children born alive to women in that age group. The number of children ever born to a particular woman is a measure of her lifetime fertility experience up to the moment at which the data are collected.
A cohort is a group of women born in the same year. Cohort completed fertility rates (CFR) may be used to compare fertility of successive generations of women who have completed their fertility life.
Is the average number of children that women would have if they experienced the ASFRs for a particular year throughout their childbearing lives (typically between 15 and 44/49 years old).
- Barkan ER (2007) Introduction: immigration, incorporation and assimilation; the limits of transnationalism. In: Barkan ER (ed) Immigration, incorporation and transnationalism. Library of Congress, Washington, DC, pp 1–24Google Scholar
- Bean FD, Marcum JP (1978) Differential fertility and the minority status hypothesis: an assessment and review. In: Bean FD, Parker Frisbie W (eds) The demography of racial and ethnic groups. Academic, New York, pp 189–211Google Scholar
- Bean FD, Tienda M (1987) The Hispanic population of the United States. Russell Sage, New York, 461 pGoogle Scholar
- Bean FD, Swicegood GC, Berg R (2000) Mexican-origin fertility: new patterns and interpretations. Soc Sci Q 81:404–420Google Scholar
- Carter M (2000) Fertility of Mexican immigrant women in the U.S.: a closer look. Soc Sci Q 81:1073–1088Google Scholar
- Garssen J, Nicolaas H (2008) Fertility of Turkish and Moroccan women in the Netherlands: adjustment to native level within one generation. Demogr Res 19(33):1249–1280. http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol19/33/19-33.pdf
- Goldstein S, Goldstein A (1983) Migration and fertility in Peninsular Malaysia: an analysis using life history data. Rand Corporation, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
- Gordon MM (1964) Assimilation in American life the role of race, religion, and national origins. Oxford University Press, New York, 276 pGoogle Scholar
- Morgan SP, Watkins SC, Ewbank D (1994) Generating Americans: the fertility of the foreign-born in the US, 1905–10. In: Watkins S (ed) After Ellis island: newcomers and natives in the 1910 census. Russel Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Toulemon L (2004) Fertility among immigrant women: new data, new approach. Popul Soc 400:1–4Google Scholar
- Courgeau D (1989) Family formation and urbanization. Popul: Engl Sel 44(1):123–146Google Scholar
- Gans HJ (1997) Toward a reconciliation of “assimilation” and “pluralism”: the interplay of acculturation and ethnic retention. Int Migr Rev 31(4):875–892. Special Issue: Immigrant Adaptation and Native-Born Responses in the Making of Americans. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2547417
- Goldstein S (1978) Migration and fertility in Thailand. Can Stud Popul 5:167–180Google Scholar
- Morawska E (1994) In defence of the assimilation model. J Am Ethn Hist 13:76–87Google Scholar
- Park RE, Burgess EW (1921) Introduction to the science of sociology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Yang Y, Morgan SP (2003) How big are educational and racial fertility differentials in the U.S.? Soc Biol 50(3–4):167–187Google Scholar