Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

Living Edition
| Editors: David M. Kaplan

Cross-Contamination of Crops in Horticulture

  • Dane Scott
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_65-4

Synonyms

Introduction

Cross-contamination of crops in horticulture is an old phenomenon. Farmers have long experienced genetic material from a neighbor’s fields finding its way into their crops. However, the recent development of transgenic crops, often referred to as genetically modified (GM) crops or genetically modified organisms (GMOs), is the source of much recent controversy regarding cross-contamination. While many countries have experienced rapid adoption of GM technology, other countries have received it with suspicion and precaution. The varied reactions to GMOs have for the last several decades given rise to conflict and debate on scientific, political, and ethical issues. Cross-contamination has become a frontline in these debates. For example, in 2011, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) approved GM alfalfa for use. Due to predicted widespread contamination of organic...

Keywords

Genetically Modify Moral Theory Precautionary Principle Genetically Modify Crop Harm Principle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Altieri, M. (2005). The myth of coexistence. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 25(4), 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Binimelis, R. (2008). Coexistence of plants and coexistence of framers: Is and individual choice possible? Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Ethics, 21, 437–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bodiguel, L., Cardwell, M., Carretero, G., & Viti, D. (2010). Coexistence of genetically modified, conventional, and organic crops in the European Union. In L. Bodiguel & M. Cardwell (Eds.), The regulation of genetically modified organisms: comparative approaches. Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Bruce, D. (2003). Contamination, crop trials, and compatibility. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Ethics, 16, 595–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Devos, Y., Demont, M., & Sanvido, O. (2008). Coexistence in the EU—return of the moratorium on GM crops? Nature Biotechnology, 26, 1223–1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. National Organic Coalition, Position Paper: GMO Contaminating Prevention and Market Fairness, What will it take? http://www.nationalorganiccoalition.org/positionpapers.html. Accessed 3 Feb 2013.
  7. Ramessar, K., Capell, T., Twyman, R. M., & Chrisoue, P. (2010). Going to ridiculous lengths—European coexistence regulations for GM crops. Nature Biotechnology, 28, 133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Thompson, P. (1995). The spirit of the soil: agriculture and environmental ethics. Abingdon, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Trewavas, T. (2001). The urban myths of organic farming. Nature, 24, 209–410.Google Scholar
  10. Trewavs, T. (1999). Much food, many problems. Nature, 402, 231–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Verhoog, H. (2007). Organic agriculture versus genetic engineering. NJAS, 54(4), 387–400.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Society and Conservation, College of Forestry and ConservationThe University of MontanaMissoulaUSA