Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

Living Edition
| Editors: David M. Kaplan

Clean Milk

  • Josh Milburn
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_598-1

Synonyms

Introduction

Clean milk is a name used to refer to milk created by technological means without the need for cows. It must be distinguished from plant-based “milks” – drinks approximating milk made from the likes of soy, nuts, rice, coconut, and so forth – as it aims to replicate dairy at a molecular level. The most notable producer of clean milk is Perfect Day (formerly Muufri), a biotechnology start-up funded by New Harvest, a charitable organization that has also funded research into the development of clean (in vitro) meat. However, home biohackers – including those associated with the US-based Real Vegan Cheese project – are pursuing similar goals. Perfect Day’s milk is set to be commercially launched in 2018, somewhat sooner than even optimistic launch dates for clean meat products.

One might assume that the ethical issues raised by clean milk parallel...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bhumitra, J., & Friedrich, B. (2016). The future of animals, the future of food: Two organizations endeavour to change public attitudes and appetites. In B. Donaldson & C. Carter (Eds.), The future of meat without animals (pp. 111–120). London: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
  2. CIWF. (2012). Statistics: Dairy cows. Compassion in world farming. https://www.ciwf.org.uk/media/5235182/Statistics-Dairy-cows.pdf. Accessed June 2017.
  3. Datar, I., Kim, E., & d’Origny, G. (2016). New Harvest is a charitable organisation: Building the cellular agriculture economy. In B. Donaldson & C. Carter (Eds.), The future of meat without animals (pp. 121–131). London: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
  4. Gaard, G. (2013). Toward a feminist postcolonial milk studies. American Quarterly, 65(3), 595–618.  https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2013.0040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gerber, P. et al. (2010). Greenhouse gas emissions from the dairy sector: A life cycle assessment. Report. Food and Agriculture Organization. Accessed at http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/k7930e/k7930e00.pdf, June 2017.
  6. Laestadius, L. I. (2015). Public perceptions of the ethics of in-vitro meat: Determining an appropriate course of action. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 28(5), 991–1009.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9573-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Miller, J. (2012). In vitro meat: Power, authenticity and vegetarianism. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 10(4), 41–63.Google Scholar
  8. Pandya, R. (2014). Milk without the moo. New Scientist, 222(2975), 28–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(14)61260-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Perfect Day. n.d. FAQs. Accessed at http://www.perfectdayfoods.com/faq/, June 2017.
  10. Sinclair, R. (2016). The sexual politics of meatless meat: (In)edible others and the myth of flesh without sacrifice. In B. Donaldson & C. Carter (Eds.), The future of meat without animals (pp. 229–248). London: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
  11. Stănescu, V. (2016). Beyond happy meat: The (im)possibilities of ‘humane’, ‘local’ and ‘compassionate’ meat. In B. Donaldson & C. Carter (Eds.), The future of meat without animals (pp. 133–154). London: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
  12. Steer, M. (2015). A comparison of land, water and energy use between conventional and yeast-derived dairy products: An initial analysis. Report. http://www.animalfreemilk.com/files/PD-LCA.pdf. Accessed June 2017.
  13. van der Weele, C., & Driessen, C. (2013). Emerging profiles for cultured meat: Ethics through and as design. Animals, 3(3), 647–662.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ani3030647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PoliticsUniversity of YorkHeslington, YorkUK