Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

Living Edition
| Editors: David M. Kaplan

Internationalization of Animal Welfare Standards

  • Michelle Sinclair
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_572-2

Introduction

Thanks to human progress, there is little doubt that the Earth is a much smaller place than previously. Technological advances in communication and travel have enabled enterprises and ideas to permeate previously inaccessible areas, in an increasingly globalized landscape. International trade is at an all-time high, including trade of animal products and live animals. This globalization has resulted in nonhuman animals being subjected to situations in which their welfare is severely compromised such as live-trade export and substandard transnational slaughter procedures. Conversely, globalization can be used as a gateway to also propagate social progression in the form of improved animal welfare standard implementation. Just as globalization is now allowing business ventures international opportunities, social progression issues now also have international exposure. This presents opportunities to move forward as a global community, which is less defined by borders. The...

Keywords

Animal Welfare Nonhuman Animal Universiti Putra Malaysia Improve Animal Welfare Animal Welfare Standard 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Izmirli, S., & Phillips, C. J. (2011). The relationship between student consumption of animal products and attitudes to animals in Europe and Asia. British Food Journal, 113(3), 436–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kahn, S., & Varas, M. (2013). OIE animal welfare standards and the multilateral trade policy framework. Resource document. Office International des Epizooties. http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Animal_Welfare/docs/pdf/Others/Animal_welfare_and_Trade/A_WTO_Paper.pdf
  4. Lapiz, S. M. D., Miranda, M. E. G., Garcia, R. G., Daguro, L. I., Paman, M. D., Madrinan, F. P., & Briggs, D. J. (2012). Implementation of an intersectoral program to eliminate human and canine rabies: The Bohol Rabies Prevention and Elimination Project. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001891. Plos.org.Google Scholar
  5. Meng, J., Hanlon, A., Handziska, A., Choe, B. I., Illmann, G., Lee, G. H., … & Alonso, M. (2009). Attitudes to animals in Eurasia: The identification of different types of animal protection through an international survey. In Minding Animals International Conference (pp. 30–30). Minding Animals Australia.Google Scholar
  6. Nestle. (2014). Nestle commitment to animal welfare. Resource document. Nestle. http://www.nestle.com/csv/rural-development-responsible-sourcing/responsible-sourcing/animal-welfare
  7. Office International des Epizooties. (2014). Terrestrial Animal Health Code. Resource document. Office International des Epizooties. http://www.oie.int/international-standard-setting/terrestrial-code/access-online/
  8. Office International des Epizooties. (2015). World Organisation for Animal Health. http://www.oie.int
  9. Phillips, C. J. C., & McCulloch, S. (2005). Student attitudes on animal sentience and use of animals in society. Journal of Biological Education, 40(1), 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Phillips, C., Izmirli, S., Aldavood, J., Alonso, M., Choe, B. I., Hanlon, A., … & Lee, G. (2010). An international comparison of female and male students’ attitudes to the use of animals. Animals, 1(1), 7–26.Google Scholar
  11. Phillips, C. J. C., Izmirli, S., Aldavood, S. J., Alonso, M., Choe, B. I., Hanlon, A., … & Lee, G. H. (2012). Students’ attitudes to animal welfare and rights in Europe and Asia. Animal Welfare-The UFAW Journal, 21(1), 87.Google Scholar
  12. Sinclair, M., & Phillips, C. J. C. (2016). The cross-cultural importance of world social issues. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  13. Sinclair, M., Zito, S., Zulkifli, Z., Yan, W., Nhiem, D. V., Na_Lampang, P., & Phillips, C. J. C. (2016). Stakeholder attitudes to animal welfare during slaughter and transport in SE and E Asia. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  14. The New Zealand and Australia OIE Collaborating Centre for Animal Welfare Science and Bioethical Analysis. (2016). Animal Welfare Standards Project. http://www.animalwelfarestandards.org
  15. Wildlife SOS. (2009). Dancing bears in India – Final curtain. Wildlife SOS. http://wildlifesos.org/dancing-bears-in-india-final-curtain/

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary SciencesThe University of QueenslandGattonAustralia