Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

Living Edition
| Editors: David M. Kaplan

Food and Agricultural Trade Sanctions

  • E. Wesley F. Peterson
  • Kiersten Haugen
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_561-1

Synonyms

Introduction

States faced with behavior by foreign governments that are perceived to be objectionable have a variety of policy responses ranging from doing nothing to declaring war. Among the foreign policy tools available, various types of sanctions have frequently been deployed both by individual states and collectively through international organizations such as the United Nations (UN). Sanctions involve the suspension of normal relations with foreign countries with the aim of forcing the offending government to alter its behavior. They are often seen as more effective than diplomatic responses but less costly than outright war. Economic sanctions, the most common type of sanction, are defined by Hufbauer et al. (2007) as “… the deliberate, government-inspired withdrawal, or threat of withdrawal, of customary trade or financial relations.” Governments may also initiate sanctions that are less directly...

Keywords

United Nations World Trade Organization Armed Conflict Economic Sanction World Trade Organization Agreement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights. (2003). Association Pour la Sauvegarde de la Paix au Burundi v Tanzania and others. Communication No 157/96, 33rd Ordinary Session (15–29 May 2003).Google Scholar
  2. Askari, H. G., Forrer, J., Teegen, H., & Yang, J. (2003). Case studies of U.S. economic sanctions: The Chinese, Cuban, and Iranian experience. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  3. Boomen, M. (2014). The effectiveness and ethics of economic sanctions. www.sevenpillars.org
  4. Botterill, L. C., & McNaughton, A. (2008). Laying the foundations for the wheat scandal: UN sanctions, private actors and the cole inquiry. Australian Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 583–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boulden, J., & Andrea, C. (2009). Evaluating UN sanctions. International Journal, LXV(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  6. Bown, C., & Pauwelyn, J. (2014). The law, economics and politics of retaliation in WTO dispute settlement. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bulto, T. S. (2011). Patching the “legal black hole”: The extraterritorial reach of states’ human rights duties in the African human rights system. South African Journal on Human Rights, 27, 249–277.Google Scholar
  8. Carter, B. (2013). Economic sanctions. In Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law (Vol. III, p. 323). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Charter of the United Nations, Jun. 26, 1945, 59 Stat. 1031.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, J. Y. (2002). Breaking down TSRA: What BIS and OFAC intended exporters to understand. The Export Practitioner, 16(7), 1–4.Google Scholar
  11. Cortright, D., & Lopez, G. A. (Eds.). (2002). Smart sanctions: Targeting economic statecraft. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. de Waart, P. (2015). Economic sanctions infringing human rights: Is there a limit?. In A. Z. Marossi & M. R. Bassett (Eds.), Economic sanctions under international law. New York, Springer/Asser Press.Google Scholar
  13. Drezner, D. W. (2011). Sanctions sometimes smart: Targeted sanctions in theory and practice. International Studies Review, 13, 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Drury, A. C., & Peksen, D. (2014). Women and economic statecraft: The negative impact international sanctions visit on women. European Journal of International Relations, 20(2), 463–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Early, B. R. (2015). Busted sanctions: Explaining why economic sanctions fail. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Elliot Kimberly, A. (2009). Assessing UN sanctions after the cold war: New and evolving standards of measurement. International Journal, LXV(1), 85–98.Google Scholar
  17. Ellis, E. (2016). The ethics of economic sanctions. In The internet encyclopedia of philosophy. ISSN 2161–0002. http://www.iep.utm.edu/
  18. Ewing-Chow, M. (2007). First do no harm: Myanmar trade sanctions and human rights. Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, 5(2), 153–180.Google Scholar
  19. Gordon, J. (1999). A peaceful, silent, deadly remedy: The ethics of economic sanctions. Ethics and International Affairs, 13, 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gordon, J. (2011). Smart sanctions revisited. Ethics and International Affairs, 25(3), 315–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gordon, J. (2012). Invisible war: The United States and the Iraq sanctions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gordon, J. (2015). Economic sanctions as ‘negative development’: The case of Cuba. Journal of International Development, Wiley Online Library.Google Scholar
  23. Hansen, K. F., & Borchgrevink, A. (2006). Cutting aid to promote peace and democracy? Intentions and effectiveness of aid sanctions. European Journal of Development Research, 18(4), 622–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heine-Ellison, S. (2001). The impact and effectiveness of multilateral economic sanctions: A comparative study. International Journal of Human Rights, 5(1), 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Henkin, L. (1990). The age of rights. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Henkin, L. (1995). International law: Politics and values. New York: Springer. ISBN 0792329082.Google Scholar
  27. House Agriculture Committee. (1998). Committee acts to end agricultural sanctions. Press release from the Committee on Agriculture, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC, June 18.Google Scholar
  28. Hufbauer, G. C., Schott, J. J., & Elliott, K. A. (2007). Economic sanctions reconsidered: History and current policy (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  29. International Law Commission. (2001). Draft articles on responsibility of states for internationally wrongful acts, with commentaries. Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its Fifty-third Session, UN GAOR, 56th Sess., Supp. No. 10, at 43, UN Doc. A/56/10.Google Scholar
  30. Jing, C., Kaempfer, W. H., & Lowenberg, A. D. (2003). Instrument choice and the effectiveness of international sanctions: A simultaneous equations approach. Journal of Peace Research, 40(5), 519–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Joyner, D. H. (2015). International legal limits on the ability of states to lawfully impose international economic/financial sanctions. In A. Z. Marossi & M. R. Bassett (Eds.), Economic sanctions under international law. New York, Springer/Asser Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kamchibekova, D. (2007). State responsibility for extraterritorial human rights violations. Buffalo Human Rights Law Review, 13, 87–150.Google Scholar
  33. Katzman, K. (2015). Iran Sanctions. CRS Report, Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  34. Koc, M., Jernigan, C., & Das, R. (2007). Food security and food sovereignty in Iraq. Food Culture and Society: An International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 10(2), 317–348.Google Scholar
  35. Laub, Z. (2015). International sanctions on Iran. CFR backgrounder, council on foreign relations, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.cfr.org/iran/interntional-sanctions-iran/p20258
  36. Lawson, R. (2004). Life after Bankovic: On the extraterritorial application of the European convention on human rights. In F. Coomans & M. T. Kamminga (Eds.), Extraterritorial application of human rights treaties. Antwerp: Intersentia.Google Scholar
  37. Leifert, W. M., & Leifert, O. (2015). Russia’s economic crisis and its agricultural and food economy. Choices, First Quarter.Google Scholar
  38. Lobsinger, E. J. (2006). Diminishing borders in trade and terrorism: An examination of regional applicability of GATT article XXI national security trade sanctions. ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law, 13, 99–138.Google Scholar
  39. Lopez, G. A. (1999). More ethical than not: Sanctions as surgical tools. Ethics and International Affairs, 13(1), 143–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lopez, G. A. (2013). Enforcing human rights through economic sanctions. In D. Shelton (Ed.), International human rights law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Marks, S. P. (1999). Economic sanctions as human rights violations: Reconciling political and public health imperatives. American Journal of Public Health, 89(10), 1509–1513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McGee, R. W. (2004). Trade sanctions as a tool of international relations. Commentaries on Law and Public Policy, 2, 53–127.Google Scholar
  43. McGee, R. W. (2014). Three views on violence, sanctions and ethics: A law and economics analysis of Gordon, Lopez and Bastiat. Working Paper, Fayetteville State University, May 11.Google Scholar
  44. Meyer, J. A., & Califano, M. G. (2006). Good intentions corrupted: The oil-for-food program and the threat to the UN. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  45. Mohamad, R. (2015). Unilateral sanctions in international law: A quest for legality. In A. Z. Marossi & M. R. Bassett (Eds.), Economic sanctions under international law. New York, Springer/Asser Press.Google Scholar
  46. Morgan, T. C., Bapat, N., & Krustev, V. (2009). The threat and imposition of economic sanctions, 1971–2000. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 26(1), 92–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. O’Brien, W. (1981). The conduct of just and limited war. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  48. Peksen, D., & Son, B. (2015). Economic coercion and currency crises in target countries. Journal of Peace Research, 52(4), 448–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rarik, C. A. (2007). Economic sanctions: Failed foreign policy tool and a cost to American business. Economic Affairs, 27(3), 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rarick, C. A., & Duchatelet, M. (2008). An ethical assessment of the use of economic sanctions as a tool of foreign policy. Economic Affairs, 28, 48–52. Institute of Economic Affairs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reynolds, C. L., & Wan, W. T. (2012). Empirical trends in sanctions and positive inducements in nonproliferation. In E. Solingen (Ed.), Sanctions, statecraft, and nuclear proliferation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Scharfen, J. C. (1995). The Dismal battlefield. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press.Google Scholar
  53. Schmitt, M. N. (1999). Computer network attack and the use of force in international law: Thoughts on a normative framework. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 37, 885–939.Google Scholar
  54. Sobel, R. S. (1998). Exchange rate evidence on the effectiveness of United Nations policy. Public Choice, 95, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Statute of the International Court of Justice, June 26, 1945, art. 38(1)(b), 3 Bevans 1179.Google Scholar
  56. The Economist. (2010). When feeding the hungry is political, March 18, 2010 at http://www.economist.com/node/15731546. Accessed 3 Mar 2016.
  57. US Department of the Treasury. (2015). Statement relating to the joint comprehensive plan of action “Adoption Day” of October 18, 2015, at http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/pages/iran.aspx
  58. USDA. (1986). Embargoes, surplus disposal and U.S. agriculture (Agricultural Economic Report Number 564). Washington, DC: Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
  59. Van Houtte, H. (1984–85). Treaty protection against economic sanctions. Revue Belge de Droit International, 18, 34–56.Google Scholar
  60. Walzer, M. (2006). Just and unjust wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  61. Weiss, T. G. (1999). Sanctions as a foreign policy tool: Weighing humanitarian impulses. Journal of Peace Research, 36(5), 499–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Winkler, A. (1999). Just sanctions. Human Rights Quarterly, 21(1), 133–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural EconomicsUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA
  2. 2.University of Nebraska College of LawBostonUSA