Skip to main content

American Chestnut and De-extinction Ethics

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Introduction

The American chestnut tree had significant ecological, economic, and cultural value to the forests and residents of the eastern United States until it was decimated by disease in the early twentieth century and became all but extinct. There are several current initiatives to make the American chestnut disease-resistant in hopes of reintroducing it to eastern forests. Chestnut de-extinction initiatives highlight a number of issues relevant to agricultural ethics, including the value of biodiversity, ethical arguments concerning genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and the concept of genomic integrity. In addition, the ethical arguments related to chestnut restoration highlight the tensions and commonalities between agricultural and environmental ethics. Ethical concerns regarding chestnut restoration pivot on questions related to whether the value placed on agricultural species is equivalent to or less than the value placed on wild species and whether there is or should...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Biermann, C. (2014). Not-quite-American chestnuts: Engaging poststructural epistemologies in nature-society research. ACME, 13, 599–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, R. (2006). Genetic engineering and the integrity of animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19, 469–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freinkel, S. (2007). American chestnut: The life, death, and rebirth of a perfect tree. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2014). Dirty money. Journal of Academic Ethics, 12, 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minteer, B. (2014). Is it right to reverse extinction? Nature, 509, 261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. (2014). The American chestnut’s genetic rebirth. Scientific American, 310, 68–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. H. (2012). Breeding for resistance: TACF and the Burnham hypothesis. The Journal of the American Chestnut Foundation, 26, 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. (2007). Food biotechnology in ethical perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evelyn Brister .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Brister, E. (2016). American Chestnut and De-extinction Ethics. In: Thompson, P., Kaplan, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_523-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_523-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6167-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics