Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

Living Edition
| Editors: Paul B. Thompson, David M. Kaplan

International Food Quality Standards

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_425-3

Synonyms

Introduction: Why and Who?

Various aspects of food quality can be controlled, coordinated, certified, and communicated by government agencies, third parties, supply chain contracts, and voluntary standards. Such quality standards can increase the value, volume, and nature of agricultural and food trade across international borders. Indeed, certain ingredient supply chains or stages of processing may span multiple countries. Imports and exports might be inspected and acknowledged to meet a particular standard, highlighting a product quality attribute or a process step. Any such coordination of national-level food quality standards can be called rapprochement (Hooker 1999). Regulatory rapprochement is the process of attempting to establish harmonious intergovernment relationships. The goal is, at best, freer trade without sacrificing consumer protection or, at least, the prevention of food quality standards from becoming a serious point of...

Keywords

Supply Chain Food Quality World Trade Organization Food Trade Voluntary Standard 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Caswell, J. A. (2012). Challenges in choosing the mix of public and private standards for food quality assurance. In W. J. Armbruster & R. D. Knutson (Eds.), U.S. Government programs affecting food and agricultural marketing (pp. 227–247). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Caswell, J. A., Bredahl, M. E., & Hooker, N. H. (1998). How quality management metasystems are affecting the food industry. Review of Agricultural Economics, 20(2), 547–557.Google Scholar
  3. GATT-SPS, (1994). General agreement on tariffs and trade: Agreement on the application of sanitary and phytosanitary measures. Final text in the results of the uruguay round of multilateral trade negotiations: The legal texts. pp. 69–84.Google Scholar
  4. Hooker, N. H. (1999). Food safety regulation and trade in food products. Food Policy, 24(6), 653–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hooker, N. H., & Caswell, J. A. (1999). A framework for evaluating nontariff barriers to trade related to sanitary and phytosanitary regulation. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50(2), 234–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Otsuki, T., Wilson, J. S., & Sewadeh, M. (2001). Saving two in a billion: Quantifying the trade effect of European food safety standards on African exports. Food Policy, 26, 495–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Souza Monteiro, D. M., & Caswell, J. A. (2010). Economics of traceability in multi-ingredient food chains. Agribusiness, 26(1), 122–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Souza Monteiro, D.M., & Hooker, N.H. (2012). Food safety and traceability. In W. J. Armbruster & R. D. Knutson (Eds.), U.S. government programs affecting food and agricultural marketing (pp. 249–272). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Van Camp, D., Ie, P., Muwanika, N., Hooker, N. H., & Vodovotz, Y. (2010). The paradox of organic ingredients. Food Technology, 64, 20–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.John Glenn School of Public AffairsThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA