Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

Living Edition
| Editors: David M. Kaplan

Food Assistance and International Trade

  • Ryan Cardwell
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_379-2

Synonyms

Introduction

The donation and delivery of food assistance is widely viewed as a purely humanitarian endeavor; however, the historical motivations for donor-countries’ food assistance policies are often self-serving. Also, food assistance can generate negative commercial and humanitarian effects in recipient-country markets. Such complications have led to the entanglement of international commercial trade policies and governing architectures with the humanitarian domain of food assistance. Several decades of debate and analysis of these issues have been productive, however, and food assistance policies have evolved to better serve those most in need.

It is worth making a clarification on terminology before proceeding. “Food aid” has traditionally been used to describe “the international sourcing of concessional resources in the form of or for the provision of food” (Barrett and Maxwell 2005). Recent innovations in the way that these resources are provided have led to...

Keywords

European Union World Trade Organization Recipient Country Donor Country Food Assistance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Barrett, C. B., & Maxwell, D. G. (2005). Food aid after fifty years: Recasting its role. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Barrett, C., Mohapatra, S., & Snyder, D. (1999). The dynamic effects of U.S. food aid. Economic Inquiry, 37(4), 647–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Canadian International Development Agency (1998). Food aid – synthesis report. Ottawa.Google Scholar
  4. Cardwell, R. (2008). Food aid and the WTO: Can new rules be effective? Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, 9(1), 74–93.Google Scholar
  5. CODEX Alimentarius (2010). Code of ethics for international trade in food including concessional and food aid transactions. Rome.Google Scholar
  6. Gelan, A. U. (2007). Does food aid have disincentive effects on local production? A general equilibrium perspective on food aid in Ethiopia. Food Policy, 32, 436–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Headey, D. (2010). Rethinking the global food crisis the role of trade shocks. IFPRI Discussion Paper, Washington, DC. International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Ho, M. D., & Hanrahan, C. E. (2010). International food aid programs: Background and issues. Washington, DC. Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  9. Mabuza, M. L., Hendriks, S. L., Ortmann, G. F., & Sithole, M. M. (2009). The impact of food aid on maize prices and production in Swaziland. Agrekon, 48(1), 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Neumayer, E. (2005). Is the allocation of food aid free from donor interest bias? The Journal of Development Studies, 41(3), 394–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nunn, N., & Qian, N. (2010). The determinants of food aid provisions to Africa and the developing world. NBER Working Paper. Boston.Google Scholar
  12. Provost, C., & Lawrence, F. (2012). US food aid programme criticised as ‘corporate welfare’ for grain giants. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  13. Schultz, T. W. (1960). Value of US farm surpluses to underdeveloped countries. Journal of Farm Economics, 42(5), 1019–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tadesse, G., & Shively, G. (2009). Food aid, food prices, and producer disincentives in Ethiopia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(4), 942–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tschirley, D., & del Castillo, A. M. (2007). Local and regional food aid procurement: An assessment of experience in Africa and elements of good donor practice. MSU International Development Working Paper, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural Economics. East Lansing.Google Scholar
  16. United States Department of Agriculture (2012). Adoption of genetically engineered crops in the U.S. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  17. Williams, D. G. (2006). Impact of proposed federal limits on US bagged food aid shipments: Reduction in MSF carrier profits – a risk assessment. Maritime Policy and Management, 33(3), 257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. World Food Programme (2012). 2011 food aid flows. Rome.Google Scholar
  19. World Food Programme (n.d.). INTERFAIS database.Google Scholar
  20. World Trade Organization (2008). Revised draft modalities for agriculture. Geneva.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agribusiness and Agricultural EconomicsUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada