Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

Living Edition
| Editors: David M. Kaplan

Geographical Indications, Food, and Culture

  • Andrea Borghini
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_302-1



Over the past two decades, geographical indications (henceforth GIs) have been at the center of a tensed international debate. Favoring their enforcement, some argue that GIs comprise the best legal tool for defending regional culinary cultures, including those of emerging countries, whose producers have little means for independently claiming reward for their most original work; thus, as noted in a United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) study, GIs “reward producers that maintain a traditional high standard of quality, while at the same time allowing flexibility for innovation and improvement in the context of that tradition” (Downes and Laird 1999, p. 6). On the other hand, major international corporations – voicing their position especially within the WTO (Handler 2006) – have stressed that GIs create monopolistic opportunities, obstacolating free trade around the globe. Further criticisms, finally,...


Intellectual Property Traditional Ecological Knowledge Specific Environmental Condition Geographical Indication TRIPs Agreement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Addor, F., & Grazioli, A. (2002). Geographical indications beyond wines and spirits. A roadmap for a better protection for geographical indications in the WTO/TRIPS agreement. Journal of World Intellectual Property, 5, 865–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angus, N. S., et al. (2006). Regional classification of New Zealand red wines using inductively-coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 12, 170–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baxter, M. J., et al. (1997). The determination of the authenticity of wine from its trace element composition. Food Chemistry, 40, 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cicerchia, M. & Pallara, P. (2009). Gli immigrati nell’agricoltura italiana, Istituto Nazionale di Economia Agraria Rome.Google Scholar
  5. Das, K. (2006). International protection of India’s geographical indications with special reference to “Darjeeling” tea. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 9, 459–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Demossier, M. (2011). Beyond terroir: Territorial construction, hegemonic discourses, and French wine culture. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, XVII, 685–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Downes, D. R. & Laird, S. A. (1999). Innovative mechanisms for sharing benefits of biodiversity and related knowledge: Case studies on geographical indications and trademarks. Paper prepared for the UNCTAD Biotrade Initiative New York.Google Scholar
  8. Handler, M. (2006). The WTO geographical indications dispute. Modern Law Review, 69, 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Josling, T. (2006). The war on terroir: Geographical indications as a transatlantic trade conflict. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57, 337–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. O’Connor, B. (2004). Law of geographical indications. London: Cameron & May.Google Scholar
  12. Reviron, S., Thevenod, E., & El Benni, N. (2009). Geographical indications: Creation and distribution of economic value in developing countries. NCCR Trade Working Papers, 14Google Scholar
  13. Vittori, M. (2010). The international debate on geographical indications (GIs): The point of view of the global coalition of GI producers – oriGIn. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 13, 304–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyCollege of the Holy CrossWorcesterUSA