Skip to main content

Food’s Purposes

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics
  • 428 Accesses

Synonyms

Food (definition); Food’s ends; Understanding food

Introduction

What is food? Central to any discussion of philosophy of food is a description of what the term “food” can mean. One way to conceptualize food is by reference to its intended use, to look at the ends to which food is put. This is an explicitly teleological approach, by which a thing, in this case food, is made sensible by reference to the goal and outcome that a user has for the given thing. On the teleological account, an action becomes sensible by recognizing three things – the reasons that a person has for acting, their action, and the outcomes of that action (Henschke 2012, pp. 58–60). This entry makes sense of food by reference to the different outcomes that a person might have for food.

A specific case example of a specific food type, bread, is used through this entry. Six purposes for food are described: basic survival, quality of life, pleasure, personal relationships, cultural expression, and trade. Note...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Buttriss, J. (2005). Strategies designed to increase awareness about folates and health, and to increase folate intake: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 16(6–7), 246–252. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2005.03.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connors, M., Bisogni, C. A., Sobal, J., & Devine, C. M. (2001). Managing values in personal food systems. Appetite, 36(3), 189–200. doi:10.1006/appe.2001.0400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henschke, A. (2012). Making sense of animal disenhancement. NanoEthics, 6(1), 55–64. doi:10.1007/s11569-012-0140-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higman, B. W. (2012). How food made history. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. (2004). Human energy requirements. Rome: FAO, United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaidar-Person, O., Person, B., Szomstein, S., & Rosenthal, R. J. (2008). Nutritional deficiencies in morbidly obese patients: A new form of malnutrition? Obesity Surgery, 18(8), 1028–1034. doi:10.1007/s11695-007-9350-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, D. (2009). The end of overeating. New York: Rodale Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, C. M. (2009). Self-constitution: Agency, identity, and integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Korsmeyer, C. (2007). Delightful, delicious, disgusting. In F. Allhoff & D. Monroe (Eds.), Food & philosophy: Eat, think and be merry. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masset, E. (2011). A review of hunger indices and methods to monitor country commitment to fighting hunger. Food Policy, 36(Supplement 1(0)), S102–S108. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, O., & Krawinkel, M. (2005). Malnutrition and health in developing countries. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 173(3), 279–286. doi:10.1503/cmaj.050342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nestel, P., Bouis, H. E., Meenakshi, J. V., & Pfeiffer, W. (2006). Biofortification of staple food crops. The Journal of Nutrition, 136(4), 1064–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollan, M. (2008). In defence of food. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. (2008). The end of food: The coming crisis in the world food industry. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank. (2012). AgResults: Innovation in research and delivery. Retrieved April 17, 2013, from http://web.worldbank.org/.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTABOUTUS/ORGANIZATION/CFPEXT/0, contentMDK:23005969 pagePK:64060249 piPK:64060294 theSitePK:299948,00.html.

  • Thompson, P. (2010). The agrarian vision: Sustainability and environmental ethics. Lexington: Kentucky University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wansink, B. (2006). Mindless eating: Why eat more than we think. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisor, S. (2012). How should INGOs allocate resources? Ethics and Global Politics, 5(1), 27–48. doi:10.3402/egp.v5i1.8287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Henschke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Henschke, A. (2013). Food’s Purposes. In: Thompson, P., Kaplan, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_204-3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_204-3

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6167-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics