Introduction
Food safety standards are a part of technical regulations categorized as sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) regulations that principally aim to ensure food safety of consumers and plant and animal health (Josling et al. 2004). Due to their potential adverse effect on international trade, however, the growing attention has recently been paid to food safety standards and other technical regulations as trade has been substantially liberalized through tariff reduction. Inherent difficulty in reaching a desirable policy solution regarding food safety standards lies in the fact that there are various losses and benefits associated with their application. Because food safety standards are designed to achieve the level of safety that is acceptable to the society, reduction or elimination of food safety standards to advance...
Notes
- 1.
JECFA estimated that implementing a 10 ppb total aflatoxin standard leads to a risk of 39 cancer deaths per year per billion people, with an uncertainty range between 7 and 164 people. In comparison, a 20 ppb standard yields a risk of 41 cancers per year per billion people with an uncertainty range between 8 and 173 cancer deaths. This implies that reducing the standard from 20 to 10 ppb in countries where percentage of carriers of hepatitis B1 is around 1 % (e.g., members of the European community) would result in a drop in the population risk of approximately two cancer deaths a year per billion people.
References
Aloui, O., & Kenny, L. (2005). The cost of compliance with SPS standards for Moroccan exports: A case study (Agriculture and rural development discussion paper No.47843, pp. 1–33). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Anders, S., & Caswell, J. A. (2009). Standards as barriers versus standards as catalysts: Assessing the impact of HACCP implementation on U.S. Seafood imports. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(2), 310–321.
Burlingame, B., & Pineiro, M. (2007). The essential balance: Risks and benefits in food safety and quality. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 20(3–4), 139–146.
Caswell, J. A., & Joseph, S. (2007). Consumer demand for quality: Major determinant for agricultural and food trade in the future? (Department of resource economics working paper, no. 2007-4). Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
Chen, M., Otsuki, T., & Wilson, J. (2008). Standards and export decisions: Firm-level evidence from developing countries. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 17(4), 501–523.
Disdier, A. C., Fontagné, L., & Mimouni, M. (2008). The impact of regulations on agricultural trade: Evidence from the SPS and TBT. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(2), 336–350.
Drogué, S., & DeMaria, F. (2012). Pesticides residues and trade: The apple of discord? Food Policy, 37(6), 641–649.
Etzel, R.A. (2006). "What the primary care pediatrician should know about syndromes associated with exposures th Mycotoxins," Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care 36 (8), 282–305.
Josling, T., Roberts, D., & Orden, D. (2004). Food regulation and trade: Toward a safe and open global food system. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economic.
Maertens, M., & Swinnen, J. F. M. (2009). Trade, standards, and poverty: Evidence from Senegal. World Development, 37(1), 161–178.
Maertens, M., Colen, L., & Swinnen, J. F. M. (2011). Globalisation and poverty in Senegal: A worst case scenario? European Review of Agricultural Economics, 38(1), 31–54.
Maskus, K. E., Otsuki, T., & Wilson, J. S. (2013). Do foreign product standards matter? Impacts on costs for developing country exporters. Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(1), 37–57.
Otsuki, T., Wilson, J. S., & Sewadeh, M. (2001a). What price precaution? European harmonization of afflation regulations and African groundnut exports. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 28(2), 263–283.
Otsuki, T., Wilson, J. S., & Sewadeh, M. (2001b). Saving two in a billion: Quantifying the trade effect of European food safety standards on African exports. Food Policy, 26(5), 495–514.
Ragasa, C., Thornsbury, S., & Joshi, S. (2011). Are food certification costs misestimated? Exporter-perspective on the European standard. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(3), 669–689.
Sherif, O., Salama, E. E., & Abdel-Wahhab, M. A. (2009). Mycotoxins and child health: The need for health risk assessment. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 212(4), 347–368.
Wilson, J. S., & Abiola, V. O. (2003). Standards and global trade: A voice for Africa. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Wilson, J. S., & Otsuki, T. (2003). Food safety and trade: Winners and losers in a non-harmonized world. Journal of Economic Integration, 18(2), 266–287.
Wilson, J. S., Otsuki, T., & Majumdar, B. (2003). Balancing food safety and risk: Do drug residue limits affect international trade in beef? Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 12(4), 377–402.
Winchester, N., Rau, M. L., Goetz, C., Larue, B., Otsuki, T., Shutes, K., Wieck, C., Burnquist, H. L., Souza, M. J. P., & Faria, R. N. (2012). The impact of regulatory heterogeneity on agri-food trade. The World Economy, 35(8), 973–993.
World Trade Organization (WTO). (1998). The committee on sanitary and phytosanitary measures (Submission by the Gambia) (G/SPS/GEN/50). Geneva: WTO.
Xiong, B., & Beghin, J. (2012). Does European aflatoxin regulation hurt groundnut exporters from Africa? European Review of Agricultural Economics, 39(4), 589–609.
Xiong, B., & Beghin, J. (2013). Disentangling demand-enhancing and trade-cost effects of maximum residue regulations (Working Paper 13-WP 544, pp. 1–35). Ames: Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Otsuki, T., Honda, K. (2014). Food Standards. In: Thompson, P., Kaplan, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_186-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_186-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6167-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities