Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics

Living Edition
| Editors: David M. Kaplan

Responsible Innovation in the Food Sector

  • Beatrice Godard
  • Jacob Aruldhas
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_174-3

Synonyms

Introduction

Corporations carry the responsibility of ensuring their own profitability, the key to their survival. Yet they have widespread impacts on people that share the social space with them, people who are in turn instrumental to their profitability. The food sector, perhaps more than any other, brings into sharp focus the contradictions inherent in this setup. Food is a basic human need, critical for sustenance, health, and well-being. Innovation is at the heart of increasing yields, lowering production costs, and optimizing profit margins. Yet what if they come at the cost of lowered quality or safety of the food thus produced? Such dangers have led to increased awareness and a keener knowledge of food and nutrition issues among consumers, which in turn has put public pressure for greater transparency and accountability from the food sector.

Lawmakers have recognized the need...

Keywords

Social Responsibility Sensitive Design Sustainable Food Food Sector Responsible Innovation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arnas, Y. A. (2006). The effects of television food advertisement on children’s food purchasing requests. Pediatrics International, 48(2), 138–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (Eds.). (1994).Reflexive modernization: politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Christensen, C. & Rayner, M. (2013). The innovator’s solution: creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review (2nd edn).Google Scholar
  4. Foray, D., Moweryb, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (2012). Public R&D and social challenges: What lessons from mission R&D programs? Research Policy, 41, 1697–1702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 251–274). London: Preager.Google Scholar
  6. Glanz, K., Basil, M., Maibach, E., Goldberg, J., & Snyder, D. (1998). Why Americans eat what they do: Taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control as influences on food consumption. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 98(10), 118–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hellstrom, T. (2003). Systemic innovation and risk: Technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation. Technology in Society, 25, 369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Houdy, P., Lahmani, M., & Marano, F. (Eds.). (2011). Nanoethics and nanotoxicology. Heidelberg: European Materials Research Society: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  9. Jarlenski, M., & Barry, C. L. (2013). News media coverage of trans fat: Health risks and policy responses. Health Communication, 28(3), 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Korthals, M. (2011). Co-evolution of nutrigenomics and society: Ethical considerations. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 94(6), 2025S–2029S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lash, S. (1994). Reflexivity and its doubles: Structure, aesthetics and community. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order (pp. 110–118). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Little, A. D. (2006). The innovation high ground – Winning tomorrow’s customers using sustainability-driven innovation. Strategic Direction, 22(1), 35–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. MacGregor, S. P., Spinach, X., & Fontrodona, J. (2007). Social innovation: Using design to generate business value through corporate social responsibility. Spain: IESE, Business School, University of Girona.Google Scholar
  14. Mahlouji, H., & Anaraki, N. K. (2009). Corporate social responsibility towards social responsibility innovation: A dynamic capability approach. International Review of Business Research Papers, 5(6), 185–194.Google Scholar
  15. McEntire, D. A. (2001). Triggering agents, vulnerabilities and disaster reduction: Towards a holistic paradigm. Disaster Prevention and Management, 10(3), 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Midttun, A. (2006). CSR and innovation, compatibility or contradiction? Towards a dynamic reinterpretation of CSR. The Norwegian School of Management, CSP paper 3. Milano: The Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.Google Scholar
  17. Pavie, X., & Egal, J. (2010). Christensen’s innovation model and responsibility: The issue of integrating responsibility in a disruptive innovation model. Projectics, 6, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rodriguez, J. C. (2010). ADA value: Social responsibility. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 10(10), 1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith, K. (1992). Environmental hazards: Assessing risk and reducing disaster. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Timmermans, J., Zhao, Y., & Van den Hoven, J. (2011). Ethics and nanopharmacy: Value sensitive design of new drugs. NanoEthics, 5, 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Van den Hoven, M. J., & Weckert, J. (2008). Information technology and moral philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social and Preventive MedicineUniversité de MontréalMontrealCanada
  2. 2.BioCEP of Columbia University’s Center for BioethicsColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA