Encyclopedia of Science Education

Living Edition
| Editors: Richard Gunstone

Internet Resources: Designing and Critiquing Materials for Scientific Inquiry

  • Ghislaine Gueudet
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6165-0_526-1

Synonyms

Introduction

In twenty-first century science classrooms, teachers and students are frequently engaged with Internet resources: lesson plans, digital textbooks, various kinds of software, videos, and much more. There is, in particular, a profusion of online resources for the teaching and learning of science. This raises important questions about the design of online resources that are effective and engaging, and how educators can evaluate the quality of items they find. This entry discusses criteria for evaluating such resources in terms of their relevance for science inquiry learning. It presents a set of criteria for evaluating resources, with a focus on the nature of the inquiry tasks that those resources can support and their link to authentic science practices.

Evaluating the Quality of Online Resources for K-12 Science Inquiry

Assessing the quality of online resources for...

Keywords

Lesson Plan Scientific Content Science Education Research Internet Resource Scientific Language 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Brown BA, Ryoo K (2008) Teaching science as a language: a “content-first” approach to science teaching. J Res Sci Teach 45(5):529–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gueudet G, Bueno-Ravel L, Forest D, Sensevy G (2010) Guidelines for online resources for inquiry-based science teaching. Deliverable 5.2, Mind the Gap FP7 project 217725, http://uv-net.uio.no/mind-the-gap/Finished%20Deliverables/5.1_Review%20of%20litterature.pdf
  3. Kim MC, Hannafin MJ, Bryan LA (2007) Technology-enhanced inquiry tools in science education: an emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice. Sci Educ 91(6):1010–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lemke J-L (1990) Talking science: language, learning and values. Ablex Publishing Corporation, NorwoodGoogle Scholar
  5. Linn MC, Clark D, Slotta JD (2003) WISE design for knowledge integration. Sci Educ 87:517–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Quintana C, Reiser BJ, Davis EA, Krajick J, Fretz E, Duncan RG, Kyza E, Edelson D (2004) A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. J Learn Sci 13(3):337–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Trouche L, Drijvers P, Gueudet G, Sacristan AI (2013) Technology-driven developments and policy implications for mathematics education. In: Bishop AJ, Clements MA, Keitel C, Kilpatrick J, Leung FKS (eds) Third international handbook of mathematics education. Springer, New York, pp 753–789Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CREAD, ESPE Bretagne, University of BrestRennesFrance