Introduction
Discussion of the relationship between knowledge and the profession of teaching is particularly convoluted because knowledge is itself the commodity at the heart of education and the very goal of teaching. For a starting point in theorizing knowledge and teaching, one can turn to Aristotle’s (384–322 BC) aphorism “it is a sign of the man who knows, that he can teach” (Metaphysics, Book 1). This can be interpreted that “really” knowing something is best evidenced in the performance of teaching. The Oxford philosopher John Wilson (1975) endorsed and extended Aristotle’s position on teacher knowledge with the argument that comprehension of the logic of concepts offered guidance on how to teach them. In other words, not only do we need to know what we teach in the sense of understanding it, but such a profound quality of knowing actually acts as a guide to the pedagogy, i.e., the “how to teach,” of subjects such as mathematics. This position has recently been developed by...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ball DL, Bass H (2003) Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In: Davis B, Simmt E (eds) Proceedings of the 2002 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group. CMESG, Edmonton, pp 3–14
Ball DL, Thames MH, Phelps G (2008) Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special? J Teach Educ 59(5):389–407
Dewey J (1903) The psychological and the logical in teaching geometry. Educ Rev 25:387–399
Grossman P, Wilson S, Shulman L (1989) Teachers of substance: subject matter knowledge for teaching. In: Reynolds M (ed) Knowledge base for the beginning teacher. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 23–36
Ma L (1999) Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah
Rowland T, Ruthven K (eds) (2011) Mathematical knowledge in teaching. Springer, London/New York
Rowland T, Martyn S, Barber P, Heal C (2000) Primary teacher trainees’ mathematics subject knowledge and classroom performance. Res Math Educ 2:3–18
Rowland T, Huckstep P, Thwaites A (2005) Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: the knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. J Math Teach Educ 8(3):255–281
Rowland T, Turner F, Thwaites A, Huckstep P (2009) Developing primary mathematics teaching: reflecting on practice with the Knowledge Quartet. Sage, London
Shulman LS (1986) Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educ Res 15(2):4–14
Watson A, Barton B (2011) Teaching mathematics as the contextual application of modes of mathematical enquiry. In: Rowland T, Ruthven K (eds) Mathematical knowledge in teaching. Springer, London/New York, pp 65–82
Wilson J (1975) Education theory and the preparation of teachers. NFER, Windsor
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Rowland, T. (2014). Frameworks for Conceptualizing Mathematics Teacher Knowledge. In: Lerman, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_63
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_63
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4977-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4978-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education