Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education

2014 Edition
| Editors: Stephen Lerman

Equity and Access in Mathematics Education

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_58


Social class background – social class is best understood through a Marxist orientation as the groupings people fall into as a result of explicit economic forces within society. These groupings are a direct result of similarities with and differences between people, particularly through the resources to which they have access, but also to their tastes and dispositions, which ultimately position them within educational systems.


Usually an encyclopedia entry will begin with some definitions. With both “equity” and “access,” that’s not possible. Each of these terms is politically loaded and reflects political and ideological dispositions both in the pedagogical arena of the classroom and in the intellectual arena of the academy. One problem of defining equity is due to it being assumed to be a universal good; surely everyone wants equity? Actually that’s far from the case, and at least there will be little agreement on how we define and more importantly...


Equity Social justice Bourdieu Social class SES (Socioeconomic status) Gender inequality Group placement 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Apple M (1995) Taking power seriously: new directions in equity in mathematics education and beyond. In: Secada W, Fennema E, Adajian L (eds) New directions in equity in mathematics education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 329–348Google Scholar
  2. Bourdieu P (1998) Practical reason. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Burton L (ed) (1990) Gender and mathematics. An international perspective. Cassell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Cahan S, Linchevski L, Ygra N, Danziger L (1996) The cumulative effect of ability grouping on mathematical achievement: a longitudinal perspective. Stud Educ Eval 22(1):29–40Google Scholar
  5. Ernest P (2007) Why social justice? Philos Math Educ J 21:2 http://people.exeter.ac.uk/PErnest/pome21/index.htm
  6. Gates P (2006) The place of equity and social justice in the history of PME. In: Guitierrez A, Boero P (eds) Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education. Past, present and future. Sense, Rotterdam, pp 367–402Google Scholar
  7. Gates P, Jorgensen R (2009) Foregrounding social justice in mathematics teacher education. J Math Teach Educ 12(3):161–170Google Scholar
  8. Herman B, Kidron Y, Riccards JB (2010) Gender equity in mathematics education. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  9. Jorgensen R, Gates P, Roper V (2013) Structural exclusion through school mathematics: using Bourdieu to understand mathematics a social practice. Educ Stud Math. doi:10.1007/s10649-013-9468-4. Published online 07 Feb 2013Google Scholar
  10. Lerman S (2000) The social turn in mathematics education research. In: Boaler J (ed) Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning. Ablex, Westport, pp 19–44Google Scholar
  11. Lubienski S (2000a) Problem solving as a means towards mathematics for all: an exploratory look through a class lens. J Res Math Educ 31(4):454–482Google Scholar
  12. Lubienski S (2000b) A clash of cultures? Students’ experiences in a discussion-intensive seventh grade mathematics classroom. Elem Sch J 100:377–403Google Scholar
  13. Lubienski S (2007) Research, reform and equity in US mathematics education. In: Nasir N, Cobb P (eds) Improving access to education. Diversity and equity in the classroom. Teachers College Press, New York, pp 10–23Google Scholar
  14. Pellino K (2007) The effects of poverty on teaching and learning. http://www.teach-nology.com/tutorials/teaching/poverty/print.htm. Accessed 4 Sept 2013
  15. Secada W (1989) Agenda setting, enlightened self-interest and equity in mathematics education. Peabody J Educ 66(1):22–56Google Scholar
  16. Skovsmose O (2011) An invitation to critical mathematics education. Sense, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  17. Zevenbergen R (2000) “Cracking the code” of mathematics classrooms: school success as a function of linguistic, social and cultural background. In: Boaler J (ed) Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning. Ablex, Westport, pp 201–223Google Scholar
  18. Zevenbergen R (2003) Ability grouping in mathematics classrooms: a Bourdieuian analysis. Learn Math 23(3):5–10Google Scholar
  19. Zohar A (1999) Teachers’ metacognitive knowledge and the instruction of higher order thinking. Teach Teach Educ 15(4):413–429Google Scholar
  20. Zohar A, Dori Y (2003) Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: are they mutually exclusive? J Learn Sci 12(2):145–181Google Scholar
  21. Zohar A, Degani A, Vaaknin E (2001) Teachers’ beliefs about low-achieving students and higher order thinking. Teach Teach Educ 17:469–485Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Research in Mathematics EducationUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK