Ethics of Epilepsy Surgery

  • Sabine Rona
Reference work entry


One percent of the global population, children as well as adults, are affected by epilepsy. In about one third of patients, seizures cannot be adequately controlled by antiepileptic medication. A significant proportion of these patients, especially of those with focal epilepsy, may benefit from epilepsy surgery. Given the patients’ reduced quality of life and the high social and economical burden of uncontrolled seizures, early consideration of epilepsy surgery is recommended. Curative epilepsy surgery procedures aim at abolishing the seizures by removing or disconnecting the area generating the seizures, without causing an unacceptable functional deficit. Palliative procedures aim at reducing the frequency and/or severity of seizures in patients who cannot be rendered seizure-free. Overall, there is a 40–80 % chance of postoperative seizure freedom, with a low risk of perioperative morbidity if the procedure is performed by an experienced neurosurgeon. In adults with temporal lobe epilepsy, two randomized controlled trials have provided evidence of the superiority of surgery over medical treatment alone.

To determine whether a patient is a candidate for epilepsy surgery and which procedure is deemed to produce the most benefit, a comprehensive evaluation needs to be performed, taking into account the type of epilepsy and its expected evolution, the individual aims and the psychosocial situation of the patient, the presence or absence of a resectable structural lesion, and the risks associated with the surgery. This chapter examines the ethical challenges related to epilepsy surgery with respect to patient selection, quality of life, and informed consent.


Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Epilepsy Surgery Seizure Freedom Epileptogenic Zone Palliative Procedure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alderson, P. (2007). Competent children? Minors’ consent to health care treatment and research. Social Science & Medicine, 65, 2272–2283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics (6th ed.). New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Choi, H., Pargeon, K., Bausell, R., Wong, J. B., Mendiratta, A., & Bakken, S. (2011). Temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: What do patients want to know? Epilepsy & Behavior, 22, 479–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cramer, J. A., Camfield, C., Carpay, H., Helmstaedter, C., Langfitt, J., Malmgren, K., & Wiebe, S. (2002). Principles of health-related quality of life: Assessment in clinical trials. Epilepsia, 43, 1084–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cross, J. H., Jayakar, P., Nordli, D., Delalande, O., Duchowny, M., Wieser, H. G., et al. (2006). Proposed criteria for referral and evaluation of children for epilepsy surgery: Recommendations of the subcommission for pediatric epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia, 47, 952–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elliott, I., Kadis, D. S., Lach, L., Olds, J., McCleary, L., Whiting, S., et al. (2012). Quality of life in young adults who underwent resective surgery for epilepsy in childhood. Epilepsia, 53, 1577–1586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Engel, J., Jr., Wiebe, S., French, J., Sperling, M., Williamson, P., Spencer, D., et al. (2003). Practice parameter: Temporal lobe and localized neocortical resections for epilepsy. Neurology, 60, 538–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Engel, J., Jr., McDermott, M. P., Wiebe, S., Langfitt, J. T., Stern, J. M., Dewar, S., et al. (2012). Early surgical therapy for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy. A randomized trial. JAMA, 307, 922–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ford, P. J. (2009). Vulnerable brains: Research ethics and neurosurgical patients. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 37, 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hauser, W. A., Annegers, J. F., & Kurland, L. T. (1993). Incidence of epilepsy and unprovoked seizures in Rochester, Minnesota: 1935–1984. Epilepsia, 34, 453–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kwan, P., & Brodie, M. J. (2000). Early identification of refractory epilepsy. The New England Journal of Medicine, 342, 314–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. LaFrance, W. C., Jr., Kanner, A. M., & Hermann, B. (2008). Psychiatric comorbidities in epilepsy. International Review of Neurobiology, 83, 347–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Langfitt, J. T., Westerveld, M., Hamberger, M. J., Walczak, T. S., Cicchetti, D. V., Berg, A. T., et al. (2007). Worsening of quality of life after epilepsy surgery: Effect of seizures and memory decline. Neurology, 68, 1988–1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Levy, N. (2012). Forced to be free? Increasing patient autonomy by constraining it. Journal of Medical Ethics, BMJ Open Access, published online February 8, 2012.Google Scholar
  15. Lüders, H. O., Najm, I., Nair, D., Widdess-Walsh, P., & Bingaman, W. (2006). The epileptogenic zone: general principles. Epileptic Disorders, 8(Suppl. 2), S1–S9.Google Scholar
  16. Macrodimitris, S., Sherman, E. M. S., Williams, T. S., Bigras, S., & Wiebe, S. (2011). Measuring patient satisfaction following epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia, 52, 1409–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Seiam, A.-H. R., Dhaliwal, H., & Wiebe, S. (2011). Determinants of quality of life after epilepsy surgery: systematic review and evidence summary. Epilepsy & Behavior, 21, 441–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sillanpää, M., & Shinnar, S. (2010). Long-term mortality in childhood-onset epilepsy. The New England Journal of Medicine, 363, 2522–2529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Spencer, S., & Huh, L. (2008). Outcomes of epilepsy surgery in adults and children. Review. Lancet Neurology, 7, 525–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Spencer, S. S., Berg, A. T., Vickrey, B. G., Sperling, M. R., Bazil, C. W., Haut, S., et al. (2007). Health-related quality of life over time since resective epilepsy surgery. Annals of Neurology, 62, 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Taylor, D. C., McMackin, D., Staunton, H., Delanty, N., & Phillips, J. (2001). Patients' aims for epilepsy surgery: Desires beyond seizure freedom. Epilepsia, 42, 629–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tellez-Zenteno, J. F., Dhar, R., & Wiebe, S. (2005). Long-term seizure outcomes following epilepsy surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain, 128, 1188–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wiebe, S., Blume, W. T., Girvin, J. P., & Eliasziw, M. (2001). A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy. The New England Journal of Medicine, 345, 311–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wilson, S., Bladin, P., & Saling, M. (2001). The “burden of normality”: Concepts of adjustment after surgery for seizures. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 70, 649–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zupanc, M. L., dos Santos Rubio, E. J., Werner, R. R., Schwabe, M. J., Mueller, W. M., & Lew, S. M. (2010). Epilepsy surgery outcomes: Quality of life and seizure control. Pediatric Neurology, 42, 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity Hospital, Eberhard Karls UniversityTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations