Advertisement

Ethical Implications of Brain Stimulation

  • Matthis Synofzik
Reference work entry

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an implanted device allowing to modulate selected brain target sites in individuals’ daily life. While it was first tested in the treatment of chronic pain, the main breakthrough was achieved in the treatment of movement disorders. The field of DBS now witnesses an exponential growth in clinical applications and investigations, including diverse psychiatric disorders, behavioral states, neurological orphan diseases, and even enhancement purposes. This leads to fundamental questions on the level of research, clinical and regulatory ethics, which are addressed in this section of the Handbook of Neuroethics. This introductory chapter provides an overview of the indications of DBS and the central ethical issues of the burgeoning field.

Keywords

Deep Brain Stimulation Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Essential Tremor Federal Drug Administration Primary Dystonia 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Agid, Y., Schupbach, M., Gargiulo, M., Mallet, L., Houeto, J. L., Behar, C., . . . Welter, M. L. (2006). Neurosurgery in Parkinson’s disease: The doctor is happy, the patient less so? Journal of Neural Transmission Supplementum, 70 (Suppl), 409–414.Google Scholar
  2. Benabid, A. L., Pollak, P., Louveau, A., Henry, S., & de Rougemont, J. (1987). Combined (thalamotomy and stimulation) stereotactic surgery of the VIM thalamic nucleus for bilateral Parkinson disease. Applied Neurophysiology, 50(1–6), 344–346.Google Scholar
  3. Clausen, J. (2009). Man, machine and in between. Nature, 457(7233), 1080–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clausen, J. (2010). Ethical brain stimulation – Neuroethics of deep brain stimulation in research and clinical practice. European Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 1152–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dunn, L. B., Holtzheimer, P. E., Hoop, J. G., Mayberg, H., Weiss Roberts, L., & Appelbaum, P. S. (2011). Ethical issues in deep brain stimulation research for treatment-resistant depression: Focus on risk and consent. AJOB Neuroscience, 2(1), 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fins, J. J., Mayberg, H. S., Nuttin, B., Kubu, C. S., Galert, T., Sturm, V., . . . Schlaepfer, T. E. (2011). Misuse of the FDA’s humanitarian device exemption in deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Health Affairs (Millwood), 30(2), 302–311. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0157.Google Scholar
  7. Hamani, C., McAndrews, M. P., Cohn, M., Oh, M., Zumsteg, D., Shapiro, C. M., . . . Lozano, A. M. (2008). Memory enhancement induced by hypothalamic/fornix deep brain stimulation. Annals of Neurology, 63(1), 119–123.Google Scholar
  8. Hariz, M. I., Blomstedt, P., & Zrinzo, L. (2010). Deep brain stimulation between 1947 and 1987: The untold story. Neurosurgical Focus, 29(2), E1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hariz, M., Blomstedt, P., & Zrinzo, L. (2013). Future of brain stimulation: New targets, new indications, new technology. Movement Disorders, 28(13), 1784–1792. doi:10.1002/mds.25665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Laxton, A. W., Tang-Wai, D. F., McAndrews, M. P., Zumsteg, D., Wennberg, R., Keren, R., . . . Lozano, A. M. (2010). A phase I trial of deep brain stimulation of memory circuits in Alzheimer’s disease. Annals of Neurology, 68(4), 521–534.Google Scholar
  11. Schlaepfer, T. E., & Fins, J. J. (2010). Deep brain stimulation and the neuroethics of responsible publishing: When one is not enough. Jama, 303(8), 775–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schupbach, M., Gargiulo, M., Welter, M. L., Mallet, L., Behar, C., Houeto, J. L., . . . Agid, Y. (2006). Neurosurgery in Parkinson disease: A distressed mind in a repaired body? Neurology, 66(12), 1811–1816.Google Scholar
  13. Synofzik, M., & Clausen, J. (2011). The ethical differences between psychiatric and neurologic DBS: Smaller than we think? AJOB Neuroscience, 2(1), 37–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Synofzik, M., & Schlaepfer, T. E. (2008). Stimulating personality: Ethical criteria for deep brain stimulation in psychiatric patients and for enhancement purposes. Biotechnology Journal, 3(12), 1511–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Synofzik, M., & Schlaepfer, T. E. (2010). Neuromodulation – ECT, rTMS, DBS. In H. Helmchen & N. Sartorius (Eds.), Ethics in psychiatry. European contributions (pp. 299–320). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Synofzik, M., & Schlaepfer, T. E. (2011). Electrodes in the brain-Ethical criteria for research and treatment with deep brain stimulation for neuropsychiatric disorders. Brain Stimulation, 4(1), 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Synofzik, M., Schlaepfer, T. E., & Fins, J. J. (2012). How happy is too happy? Euphoria, neuroethics and deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens. AJOB Neuroscience, 2(1), 37–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurology, Centre for Neurology and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain ResearchUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations