Advertisement

Beyond Dual-Processes: The Interplay of Reason and Emotion in Moral Judgment

  • Chelsea Helion
  • David A. Pizarro
Reference work entry

Abstract

A great deal of research in moral psychology has focused on the interplay between emotion and reason during moral judgment, characterizing the two as forces working in opposition to influence judgment. Below, recent psychological research on morality is reviewed, with a special focus on disgust and the nature of its role in moral and political judgment. Behavioral, neuroscience, and physiological data are reviewed looking at the role of disgust in moral judgment, with a particular emphasis on the role of emotion regulation – the process of shifting emotional responses in order to meet one’s goals. It is suggested that dual-process theories of moral judgment are not well suited to understand the role of emotion regulation in influencing moral judgments and decisions. Theories that emphasize the primacy of one process over another may ultimately be missing the complexity how these processes interact to influence moral judgment.

Keywords

Emotion Regulation Moral Judgment Moral Reasoning Implementation Intention Moral Dilemma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amodio, D. M., & Devine, P. G. (2006). Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: Evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 652–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bargh, J. A., & Ferguson, M. J. (2000). Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartels, D., & Pizarro, D. A. (2011). The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas. Cognition, 121, 154–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batson, C. D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In D. T. Gilbert & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 282–316). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Calder, A. J., Keane, J., Manes, F., Antoun, N., & Young, A. W. (2000). Impaired recognition and experience of disgust following brain injury. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 1077–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dasgupta, N., DeSteno, D. A., Williams, L., & Hunsinger, M. (2009). Fanning the flames of prejudice: The influence of specific incidental emotions on implicit prejudice. Emotion, 9, 585–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Decety, J., & Batson, C. D. (2009). Empathy and morality: Integrating social and neuroscience approaches. In J. Braeckman, J. Verplaetse, & J. De Schrijver (Eds.), The moral brain. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Demaree, H. A., Schmeichel, B. J., Robinson, J. L., Pu, J., Everhart, D. E., & Berntson, G. G. (2006). Up- and down-regulating facial disgust: Affective, vagal, sympathetic, and respiratory consequences. Biological Psychology, 71, 90–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foot, P. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. Oxford Review, 5, 5–15.Google Scholar
  10. Gallo, I. S., McCulloch, K. C., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2012). Differential effects of various types of implementation intentions on the regulation of disgust. Social Cognition, 30(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldin, P. R., McRae, K., Ramel, W., & Gross, J. J. (2008). The neural bases of emotion regulation: Reappraisal and suppression of negative emotion. Biological Psychiatry, 63(6), 577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. (2009). Liberals and conservatives use different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greene, J. D. (2009). The cognitive neuroscience of moral judgment. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences IV. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Greene, J., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 517–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107, 1144–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gross, J. J. (1998a). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gross, J. J. (1998b). Antecedent-and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39, 281–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haidt, J., & Bjorklund, F. (2008). Social intuitionists answer six questions about moral psychology. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology (The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity, Vol. 2, pp. 181–217). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Haidt, J., & Hersh, M. (2001). Sexual morality: The cultures and emotions of conservatives and liberals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 191–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haidt, J., Koller, S., & Dias, M. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 613–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haidt, J., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(5), 701–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Helzer, E., & Pizarro, D. A. (2011). Dirty liberals!: Reminders of cleanliness promote conservative political and moral attitudes. Psychological Science, 22, 517–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hume, D. (1960). An enquiry concerning the principles of morals. La Salle, IL: Open Court. (Original work published 1777).Google Scholar
  28. Hutcherson, C. A., & Gross, J. J. (2011). The moral emotions: A social functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 719–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009a). Conservatives are more easily disgusted. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 714–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., Knobe, J., & Bloom, P. (2009b). Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays. Emotion, 9, 435–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., Ayer, R., & Haidt, J. (2012a). Disgust sensitivity, political conservatism, and voting. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 527–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2012b). Disgusting smells cause decreased liking of gay men. Emotion, 12(1), 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  34. Kline, L. W. (1903). A study in juvenile ethics. The Pedagogical Seminary, 10(2), 239–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kohlberg, L. (1963). Moral development and identification. In H. Stevenson (Ed.), Child psychology: 62nd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lieberman, M. D. (2010). Social cognitive neuroscience. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 143–193). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  38. Loewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The role of affect in decision making. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 619–642). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Moll, J., de Oliveira - Souza, R., Eslinger, P. J., Bramati, I. E., Mourao - Miranda, J., & Andreiuolo, P. A. (2002). The neural correlates of moral sensitivity: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of basic and moral emotions. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 2730–2736.Google Scholar
  40. Monin, B., Pizarro, D. A., & Beer, J. S. (2007). Deciding versus reacting: Conceptions of moral judgment and the reason-affect debate. Review of General Psychology, 11(2), 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ochsner, K. N. (2004). Current directions in social cognitive neuroscience. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 254–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2005). The cognitive control of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 242–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2008). Cognitive emotion regulation: Insights from social cognitive and affective neuroscience. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ochsner, K. N., Ray, R. D., Robertson, E. R., Cooper, J. C., Chopra, S., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Gross, J. J. (2004). For better or for worse: Neural systems supporting the cognitive down- and up-regulation of negative emotion. NeuroImage, 23(2), 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Olatunji, B. O., Williams, N. L., Tolin, D. F., Sawchuck, C. N., Abramowitz, J. S., Lohr, J. M., et al. (2007). The disgust scale: Item analysis, factor structure, and suggestions for refinement. Psychological Assessment, 19, 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Olatunji, B. O., Haidt, J., McKay, D., & David, B. (2008). Core, animal reminder, and contamination disgust: Three kinds of disgust with distinct personality, behavioral, physiological, and clinical correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1243–1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Paxton, J. M., Ungar, L., & Greene, J. D. (2011). Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 36, 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Phan, K. L., Wager, T., Taylor, S. F., & Liberzon, I. (2002). Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: A meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. NeuroImage, 16(2), 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  50. Pizarro, D. (2000). Nothing more than feelings? The role of emotions in moral judgment. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30, 355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2003). The intelligence of the moral intuitions: A comment on Haidt (2001). Psychological Review, 110, 193–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pizarro, D. A., Uhlmann, E., & Bloom, P. (2003). Causal deviance and the attribution of moral responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 653–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pizarro, D., Inbar, Y., & Helion, C. (2011). On disgust and moral judgment. Emotion Review, 3(3), 267–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rozin, P. (1999). The process of moralization. Psychological Science, 10, 218–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rozin, P., & Singh, L. (1999). The moralization of cigarette smoking in America. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 8, 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. (1999). The moral-emotion triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral ethics (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 574–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. R. (2000). Disgust. In M. Lewis & J. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 637–653). NewYork: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  58. Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. R. (2008). Disgust: The body and soul emotion in the 21st century. In D. McKay & O. Olatunji (Eds.), Disgust and its disorders (pp. 9–29). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  59. Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1096–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schweiger Gallo, I., Keil, A., McCulloch, K. C., Rockstroh, B., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2009). Strategic automation of emotion regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, divinity), and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119–169). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Stevenson, R. L. (1886/2006). The strange case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  63. Tamir, M. (2009). What do people want to feel and why? Pleasure and utility in emotion regulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(2), 101–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tapias, M., Glaser, J., Vasquez, K. V., Keltner, D., & Wickens, T. (2007). Emotion and prejudice: Specific emotions toward outgroups. Group Processes and Inter Group Relations, 10, 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Thomson, J. J. (1985). The trolley problem. The Yale Law Journal, 279, 1395–1415.Google Scholar
  66. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 375–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D. L., & Griskevicius, V. G. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2008). The duality of virtue: Deconstructing the moral hypocrite. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44(5), 1334–1338.Google Scholar
  70. Wager, T. D., Davidson, M. L., Hughes, B. L., Lindquist, M., & Ochsner, K. N. (2008). Prefrontal-subcortical pathways mediating successful emotion regulation. Neuron, 59, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wendorf, C. W. (2001). History of American morality research, 1894–1932. History of Psychology, 4(3), 272–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zajonc, R. B., & Sales, S. M. (1966). Social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2(2), 160–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations