This entry has two general aims. The first is to profile the practices of neuromarketing (both current and hypothetical), and the second is to identify what is ethically troubling about these practices. It will be claimed that neuromarketing does not really present novel ethical challenges and that marketers are simply continuing to do what they have always done, only now they have at their disposal the tools of neuroscience which they have duly recruited. What will be presupposed is a principle of proportionality: marketing practices are morally objectionable commensurate with the degree to which they impugn the moral sovereignty of market actors. With this principle in mind, it is important to consider the literature which is skeptical about the potential for neuromarketing to be successful. If its claims are overblown, as will be suggested, then the ethical threat neuromarketing is said to pose can be viewed also as overblown. An area that has worried many is that neuromarketing poses a threat to brain privacy, and so an analysis will be given of the nature of this threat, given the principle of proportionality. It will be argued that worries about brain privacy seem, prima facie, to be justified, but on closer analysis fall away. However, a residual threat to privacy does remain: the collection over time, and aggregation of private brain information, where the target loses control over its ownership and distribution.
- Marketing Practice
- Endowment Effect
- Mind Reading
- Vulnerable Consumer
- Brain Information
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Ambler, T., & Burne, T. (1999). The impact of affect on memory of advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(2), 25–34.
Ambler, T., Ionnides, A., & Rose, S. (2000). Brands on the brain: Neuro-images of advertising. Business Strategy Review, 11(3), 17–30.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M. A., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego-depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265.
Bhatia, T. K. (2000). Advertising in Rural India: Language, marketing communication, and consumerism. Tokyo: Tokyo Press.
Canli, T. (2006). When genes and brains unite: Ethical implications of genomic neuroimaging. In J. Illes (Ed.), Neuroethics: Defining the issues in theory, practice, and policy (pp. 169–183). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Desmond, J. E., & Glover, G. H. (2002). Estimating sample size in functional MRI (fMRI) neuroimaging studies: Statistical power analyses. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 118, 115–128.
Ehrlinger, J., Johnson, K., Banner, M., Bunning, D., & Kruger, J. (2008). Why the unskilled are unaware: Further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 105(1), 98–121.
Erk, S., Spitzer, M., Wunderlich, A., Galley, L., & Walter, H. (2002). Cultural objects modulate reward circuitry. Neuroreport, 13(18), 2499–2503.
Farah, M. J., Smith, E. M., Gawuga, C., Lindsell, D., & Foster, D. (2008). Brain imaging and brain privacy: A realistic concern? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(1), 119–127.
Fischbach, R., & Mindes, J. (2011). Why neuroethicists are needed. In Judy, J. & J. S. Barbara (Eds.), Oxford handbook of neuroethics (pp. 343–376). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gazzaniga, M. S. (2006). The ethical brain. New York: The Dana Press.
Hubert, M., & Kenning, P. (2008). A current overview of consumer neuroscience. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7, 272–292.
Kennett, J., & Matthews, S. (2008). What’s the buzz? Undercover marketing and the corruption of friendship. The Journal of Applied Philosophy, 25(1), 2–18.
Knutson, B., Rick, S., Wimmer, G. E., Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Neural predictors of purchase. Neuron, 53(1), 147–156.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. (2012). Marketing management. Boston: Prentice Hall.
Lee, N., Broderick, A. J., & Chamberlain, L. (2007). What is neuromarketing: A discussion and agenda for future research. International Journal of Pyshcophysiology, 63, 199–204.
Levy, N. (2007). Neuroethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levy, N. (2009). Neuromarketing: Ethical and political challenges. Etica & Politica/Ethics and Politics, XI(2), 10–17.
Lewis, D., & Brigder, D. (2005). Market researchers make increasing use of brain imaging. Advances in Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, 5(3), 36–37.
Matthews, S. (2008). Privacy, separation, and control. The Monist, 91(1), 130–150.
McClure, S. M., Li, J., Tomlin, D., Cypert, K. S., Montague, L. M., & Montague, P. R. (2004). Neural correlates of behavioral preference for culturally familiar drinks. Neuron, 44, 379–387.
Miller, S., & Selgelid, M. J. (2009). Ethical and philosophical consideration of the dual-use dilemma in the biological sciences. Dordrecht: Springer.
Moore, G. (1965). Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics, 38(8), 114–117.
Murawski, C., Harris, P. G., Bode, S., Domínguez, D. J. F., & Egan, G. F. (2012). Led into temptation? Rewarding brand logos bias the neural encoding of incidental economic decisions. PLoS ONE, 7(3), e34155. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034155.
Murphy, E. R., & Greely, H. T. (2011). What will be the limits of neuroscience-based mindreading. In Judy, J. & J. S. Barbara (Eds.), Oxford handbook of neuroethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Murphy, E., Illes, J., & Reiner, P. B. (2008). Neuroethics of neuromarketing. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7, 293–302.
Nagel, T. (1998). Concealment and exposure. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 27(1), 3–30.
Nissenbaum, H. (1998). Protecting privacy in an information age: The problem of privacy in public. Law and Philosophy, 17, 559–596.
North, A. C., Hargreaves, D. J., & McKendrick, J. (1999). The influence of in-store music on wine selections. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 271–276.
Nutt, D. (2012). Drugs: Without the hot air. Cambridge: UIT.
Nwahukwu, S. L. S., Vitell, S. J., Gilbert, F. W., & Barnes, J. H. (1997). Ethics and social responsibility in marketing: An examination of the ethical evaluation of advertising strategies. Journal of Business Research, 39, 107–118.
Packard, V. (1957). The hidden persuaders. Brooklyn: IG.
Peters, J. F. (Ed.). (2005). Are your thoughts your own?: “Neuroprivacy” and the legal implications of brain imaging. The Committee on Science and Law. New York. http://www.nycbar.org/pdf/report/Neuroprivacy-revisions.pdf
Plassman, H., O’Doherty, J., & Rangel, A. (2008). Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(3), 1050–1054.
Plassman, H., Ramsoy, T. Z., & Milosavljevic, M. (2012). Branding the brain: A critical review and outlook. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(1), 18–36.
Thompson, C. (2003, October 25). There’s a sucker born in every medial prefrontal cortex. New York Times Magazine. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/26/magazine/26Brains.html?src=pm&pagewanted=1
Vohs, K. D., & Faber, R. (2003). Self-regulation and impulsive spending patterns. In P. A. Keller & D. W. Rook (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, 30(1), 125–126.
Weisberg, D. S., Keil, F., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E., & Gray, J. R. (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(3), 470–477.
Wilson, M. R., Gaines, J., & Hill, R. P. (2008). Neuromarketing and consumer free will. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 42, 389–410.
Winkielman, P., Berridge, K. C., & Wilbarger, J. L. (2005). Unconscious affective reactions to masked happy versus angry faces influence consumption behavior and judgments of value. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1), 121–135.
Zak, P. J., Kurzban, R., & Matzner, W. T. (2004). The neurobiology of trust. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1032, 224–227.
Zak, P. J., Kurzban, R., & Matzner, W. T. (2005). Oxytocin is associated with human trustworthiness. Hormones and Behavior, 48, 522–527.
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Matthews, S. (2015). Neuromarketing: What Is It and Is It a Threat to Privacy?. In: Clausen, J., Levy, N. (eds) Handbook of Neuroethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_154
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4706-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4707-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences