Normal Brain Development and Child/Adolescent Policy

Reference work entry

Abstract

In the last 25 years, magnetic resonance imaging technology has fundamentally changed how human brain development is conceptualized. Brain structures and the communication among them are now understood to change well into early adulthood in ways that impact maturity of judgment. The popular conversation about where to draw the line between childhood and adulthood for policy purposes has highlighted a number of complex neuroethical issues including: balancing responsibility and autonomy, the strengths and frailties of human competence, and decision making in the era of neuroimaging. In this chapter, two public policy issues: Informed consent and legal culpability are used to illustrate the emerging neuroethical challenges and opportunities involved in using neuroscience to inform child and adolescent policy.

This chapter begins with an overview of historical attempts to use biological benchmarks of adult maturity. This historical perspective is followed by an introduction to the neuroethical issues involved in informed consent and legal culpability for adolescents, and the brain and behavioral science that has been brought to bear on these policy questions. The focus of this scientific review is the development and deployment of the cognitive capacities that are the foundation of maturity of judgment during late childhood and adolescence: self-control, inhibition, emotion regulation, and vulnerability to peer influence. Finally, the opportunities and potential pitfalls involved in using brain science to inform child and adolescent policy are considered.

Keywords

Prefrontal Cortex United States Supreme Late Maturation Developmental Science Adolescent Brain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aber, L., Atkins, M., et al. (2012). Brief of Amici Curiae in No. 10–9646 & No. 10–9647.Google Scholar
  2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2009). Tool kit for teen care. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association. (1989). Amicus curiae brief filed in U.S. Supreme Court in Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc., 497 U.S. 502 (1990) and Hodgson v. Min- nesota, 497 U.S. 417 (1990). Retrieved November 27, 2012, from http://www.apa.org/about/offices/ogc/amicus/hodgson.aspx
  4. American Psychological Association and the Missouri Psychological Association. (2004). Amicus brief to the Supreme Court of the United States Supporting Christopher Simmons in Roper vs. Simmons (Case No. 03–633).Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, P. (2002). Assessment and development of executive function (EF) during childhood. Neuropsychology, Development and Cognition, Section C: Child Neuropsychology, 8(2), 71–82.Google Scholar
  6. Arnett, J. J. (1992). Reckless behavior in adolescence: A developmental perspective. Developmental Review, 12(4), 339–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aronson, J. (2007). Brain imaging, culpability and the juvenile death penalty. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 13(2), 115–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benes, F. M. (1998). Brain development, VII: Human brain growth spans decades: Carol A. Tamminga, M.D., Editor. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155(11), 1489.Google Scholar
  9. Braitenberg, V. (2001). Brain size and number of neurons: An exercise in synthetic neuroanatomy. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 10(1), 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casey, B. J., Getz, S., et al. (2008). The adolescent brain. Developmental Review, 28(1), 62–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cauffman, E., & Steinberg, L. (2012). Emerging findings from research on adolescent development and juvenile justice. Victims & Offenders, 7(4), 428–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chein, J., Albert, D., et al. (2010). Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain’s reward circuitry. Developmental Science, 14(2), F1–F10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cluxton-Brock, T. (1991). The evolution of parental care. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cunningham, M. G., Bhattacharyya, S., et al. (2002). Amygdalo-cortical sprouting continues into early adulthood: Implications for the development of normal and abnormal function during adolescence. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 453(2), 116–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dahl, R. E. (2001). Affect regulation, brain development, and behavioral/emotional health in adolescence. CNS Spectrums, 6(1), 60–72.Google Scholar
  16. Derish, M. T., & Heuvel, K. V. (2000). Mature minors should have the right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics: A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 28(2), 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dosenbach, N. U. F., Nardos, B., et al. (2010). Prediction of individual brain maturity using fMRI. Science, 329(5997), 1358–1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ernst, M., Romeo, R. D., et al. (2009). Neurobiology of the development of motivated behaviors in adolescence: A window into a neural systems model. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 93(3), 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farah, M. J., & Hook, C. J. (2013). The seductive allure of “Seductive Allure”. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(1), 88–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feld, B. (1993). Criminalizing the American juvenile court. In B. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (p. 17). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Fields, R. D., & Stevens-Graham, B. (2002). New insights into neuron-glia communication. Science, 298(5593), 556–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ford, C., Bearman, P. S., et al. (1999). Foregone health care among adolescents. JAMA, 282(23), 2227–2234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ford, C., English, A., et al. (2004). Confidential health care for adoelscents: Position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35, 160–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Giedd, J. N., Blumenthal, J., et al. (1999). Brain development during childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal MRI study. Nature Neuroscience, 2(10), 861–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grosbras, M. H., Jansen, M., et al. (2007). Neural mechanisms of resistance to peer influence in early adolescence. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(30), 8040–8045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holzhaider, J. C., Hunt, G. R., et al. (2010). Social learning in New Caledonian crows. Learning & Behavior, 38(3), 206–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hughes, V. (2010). Science in court: Head case. Nature, 464, 340–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Irwin, C. E. Jr., Millstein, S. G., et al. (1992). Risk-taking behaviors and biopsychosocial development during adolescence. In Emotion, cognition, health, and development in children and adolescents (pp. 75–102). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. James, T. (1960). The age of majority. The American Journal of Legal History, 4, 22–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson, S. B., & Blum, R. W. (2012). Stress and the brain: How experiences and exposures across the life span shape health, development, and learning in adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(2), S1–S2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson, S. B., Blum, R. W., et al. (2009). Adolescent maturity and the brain: The promise and pitfalls of neuroscience research in adolescent health policy. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(3), 216–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Luna, B., & Sweeney, J. A. (2004). The emergence of collaborative brain function: FMRI studies of the development of response inhibition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1021, 296–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Luna, B., Thulborn, K. R., et al. (2001). Maturation of widely distributed brain function subserves cognitive development. NeuroImage, 13(5), 786–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Luna, B., Padmanabhan, A., et al. (2010). What has fMRI told us about the development of cognitive control through adolescence? Brain and Cognition, 72(1), 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice. (2006). Issue Brief 3: Less guilty by reason of adolesence (September 21, 2006).Google Scholar
  36. Olson, E. A., Collins, P. F., et al. (2009). White matter integrity predicts delay discounting behavior in 9- to 23-year-olds: A diffusion tensor imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(7), 1406–1421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Paus, T. (2010). Growth of white matter in the adolescent brain: Myelin or axon? Brain and Cognition, 72(1), 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paus, T., Collins, D. L., et al. (2001). Maturation of white matter in the human brain: A review of magnetic resonance studies. Brain Research Bulletin, 54(3), 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paus, T., Toro, R., et al. (2008). Morphological properties of the action-observation cortical network in adolescents with low and high resistance to peer influence. Social Neuroscience, 3(3–4), 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Robertson, S. (2008). Age of consent laws in children and youth in history, Item #230. Retrieved January 14, 2013, from http://chnm.gmu.edu/cyh/teaching-modules/230
  41. Rubia, K., Overmeyer, S., et al. (2000). Functional frontalisation with age: Mapping neurodevelopmental trajectories with fMRI. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 24(1), 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Siever, L. J. (2008). Neurobiology of aggression and violence. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(4), 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Somerville, L. H., Jones, R. M., et al. (2010). A time of change: Behavioral and neural correlates of adolescent sensitivity to appetitive and aversive environmental cues. Brain and Cognition, 72(1), 124–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sowell, E. R., Thompson, P. M., et al. (1999). In vivo evidence for post-adolescent brain maturation in frontal and striatal regions. Nature Neuroscience, 2(10), 859–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sowell, E. R., Thompson, P. M., et al. (2001). Mapping continued brain growth and gray matter density reduction in dorsal frontal cortex: Inverse relationships during postadolescent brain maturation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21(22), 8819–8829.Google Scholar
  46. Sowell, E. R., Petersen, B. S., et al. (2003). Mapping cortical change across the human life span. Nature Neuroscience, 6(3), 309–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Spear, L. P. (2000). The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 24(4), 417–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Steinberg, L. (2007). Risk-taking in adolescence: New perspectives from brain and behavioral science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Steinberg, L. (2009). Adolescent development and juvenile justice. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5(1), 459–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Steinberg, L., & Scott, E. S. (2003). Less guilty by reason of adolescence: Developmental immaturity, diminished responsibility, and the juvenile death penalty. American Psychologist, 58(12), 1009–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., et al. (2009). Are adolescents less mature than adults?: Minors’ access to abortion, the juvenile death penalty, and the alleged APA “flip-flop”. The American Psychologist, 64(7), 583–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thomas, N., & O’Kane, C. (1998). The ethics of participatory research with children. Children & Society, 12(5), 336–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. United States Supreme Court. (1990). Hodgson vs. Minnesota, 497, US 417.Google Scholar
  55. United States Supreme Court. (2005). Roper vs. Simmons, US Supreme Court.Google Scholar
  56. United States Supreme Court. (2010). Graham vs. Florida, US Supreme Court.Google Scholar
  57. United States Supreme Court. (2012). Miller vs. Alabama, 567.Google Scholar
  58. Wahlstrom, D., White, T., & Luciana, M. (2010). Neurobehavioral evidence for changes in dopamine system activity during adolescence. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(5), 631–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weisberg, D. S., Keil, F. C., et al. (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(3), 470–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental HealthBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations