Abstract
This introductory chapter to the section on the “Weaponization of Neuroscience” provides a short overview of the developments in biological disarmament since the beginning of the twentieth century. It starts with an account of the problems at the Fifth Review Conference of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention to establish a verification regime and how the Convention subsequently shifted its focus from state to non-state actors in terms of preventing the development of biological weapons. As part of this reorientation, the issue of the potential misuse of benign scientific research was raised, which was coined “dual-use biosecurity” or the “dual-use dilemma” in the following debates. While the international security community was initially only worried about the misuse of neuroscience by malign non-state actors, the disarmament community has expanded the topic to include the use of scientific research by state military as well.
The five chapters in this section discuss the following: Is neuroscience research of interest to the military? Does international law regulate neuroscience? What is the level of awareness and education of neuroscientists on the topic of dual use? How can the neuroscience community work towards protecting their research from misuse? What can neuroethics do?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dando, M. R. (2009). Bioethicists enter the dual-use debate. Bulletin of the atomic scientists. http://www.thebulletin.org/web-edition/columnists/malcolm-dando/bioethicists-enter-the-dual-use-debate. Accessed 29 Jan 2013.
Ehni, H.-J. (2008). Dual use and the ethical responsibility of scientists. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 56, 147–152.
Kuhlau, F., Eriksson, S., Evers, K., & Höglund, A. T. (2008). Taking due care: Moral obligations in dual use research. Bioethics, 22(9), 477–487.
Marks, J. H. (2010). A neurosceptic’s guide to neuroethics and national security. AJOB – Neuroscience, 1(2), 4–12.
Miller, S., & Selgelid, M. J. (2008). Ethical and philosophical consideration of the dual-use dilemma in the biological sciences. New York: Springer.
National Research Council. (2004). Biotechnology research in an age of terrorism. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Novossiolova, T., Minehata, M., & Dando, M. R. (2012). The creation of a contagious H5N1 Influenza virus: Implications for the education of life scientists. Journal of Terrorism Research, 3(1), Special Issue – Assessing the Emergency Response to Terrorism. http://ojs.st-andrews.ac.uk/index.php/jtr/issue/view/46. Accessed 29 Jan 2013.
The Royal Society. (2012). Brain waves module 3: Neuroscience, conflict and security. London: The Royal Society. http://royalsociety.org/uploadedFiles/Royal_Society_Content/policy/projects/brain-waves/2012-02-06-BW3.pdf. Accessed 29 Jan 2012.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Walther, G. (2015). Weaponization of Neuroscience. In: Clausen, J., Levy, N. (eds) Handbook of Neuroethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_144
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_144
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4706-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4707-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law