Neural Transplantation and Medical Ethics: A Contemporary History of Moral Concerns Regarding Cerebral Stem Cell and Gene Therapy

Reference work entry

Abstract

The possibilities of brain transplantation, neural transplants, and neural grafting as well as early approaches of gene therapies have inspired the fantasies and optimism of both scientists and the public. They have also caused hopes and fears at the same time, which are reflected in ethical debates about their use and usefulness in medicine. Based on the scientific and public discourse about neural transplants and genetic interventions in a broad understanding, the aim of this chapter is to reconstruct the major aspects of the development of a medical technology and the ethical concerns, which have accompanied its application since the 1890s. Ethical debates may vary in different countries based on different cultures and traditions. Therefore, we must stress that the main focus of this chapter is based on the English and German literature.

Keywords

Gene Therapy Personal Identity Fetal Tissue Genetic Intervention Severe Combine Immune Deficiency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson, W. F. (1990). Editorial. September 14, 1990: The beginning. Human Gene Therapy, 1(4), 371–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Annas, G. J., Caplan, A., et al. (1999). Stem cell politics, ethics and medical progress. Nature Medicine, 5(12), 1339–1341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anonymous. (1890). Successful brain grafting. Science, 16(392), 78–79.Google Scholar
  4. Anonymous. (1968, August 14). Controversy surprises Barnard. Times, Overseas News, 3.Google Scholar
  5. Anonymous. (1976). Kopf mit Kraftpaket. Der Spiegel, 44, 225.Google Scholar
  6. Anonymous. (1982, November 22). Transplant hopes for brain tissue. Times, Home News, 2.Google Scholar
  7. Anonymous. (1983, August 20). Work in rats. The Economist, 7303, 85–86.Google Scholar
  8. Anonymous. (2001, April 6). Frankenstein fears after head transplant. BBC News Online. Retrieved March 3, 2013, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/1263758.stm
  9. Backlund, E. O., Granberg, P. O., et al. (1985). Transplantation of adrenal medullary tissue to striatum in parkinsonism. First clinical trials. Journal of Neurosurgery, 62(2), 169–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beardsley, T. (1990). Aborted Research. Ideology seems to have put some medical advances on hold. Scientific American, 262(2), 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berg, T. (2006). Human brain cells in animal brains: Philosophical and moral considerations. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, 6(1), 89–107.Google Scholar
  12. Bishop, J. M. (1982). Oncogenes. Scientific American, 246, 80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Björklund, A., & Stenevi, U. (1985a). Intracerebral neural grafting: A historical perspective. In A. Björklund & U. Stenevi (Eds.), Neural grafting in the mammalian CNS (pp. 3–14). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  14. Björklund, A., & Stenevi, U. (Eds.). (1985b). Neural grafting in the mammalian CNS. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  15. Boer, G. J. (1994). Ethical guidelines for the use of human embryonic or fetal tissue for experimental and clinical neurotransplantation and research. Journal of Neurology, 242(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Boer, G. J. (1999). Ethical issues in neurografting of human embryonic cells. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 20(5), 461–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Borges, L. F. (1988). Historical development of neural transplantation. Applied Neurophysiology, 51(6), 265–277.Google Scholar
  18. Boyer, K. L., & Bakay, R. A. (1995). The history, theory, and present status of brain transplantation. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 6(1), 113–125.Google Scholar
  19. Burd, L., Gregory, J. M., et al. (1998). The brain-mind quiddity: Ethical issues in the use of human brain tissue for therapeutic and scientific purposes. Journal of Medical Ethics, 24(2), 118–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carlson, G. A., Borchelt, D. R., Dake, A., Turner, S., Danielson, V., Coffin, J. D., Eckman, C., Meiners, J., Nilsen, S. P., Younkin, S. G., & Hsiao, K. K. (1997). Genetic modification of the phenotypes produced by amyloid precursor protein overexpression in transgenic mice. Human Molecular Genetics, 6(11), 1951–1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clinton, W. J. (1994). Memorandum of January 22, 1993. Code of federal regulations; Title 3, The President 1993 compilation and parts 100 to 102, 724.Google Scholar
  22. Coutts, M. C. (1993). Scope Note 21. Fetal tissue research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 3(1), 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Das, G. D. (Ed.). (1986). Neural transplantation and regeneration. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Das, G. D. (1990). Neural transplantation: An historical perspective. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 14(4), 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. DeGrazia, D. (2005). Human identity and bioethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dunnett, S. B. (Ed.). (1992). Neural transplantation: A practical approach. Oxford: IRL Press.Google Scholar
  27. Fangerau, H. (2011). Brain, mind and regenerative medicine: Ethical uncertainties and the paradox of their technical fix. In H. Fangerau, J. Fegert, & T. Trapp (Eds.), Implanted minds. The neuroethics of intracerebral stem cell transplantation and deep brain stimulation (pp. 15–30). Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  28. Freed, W. J. (2000). Neural transplantation. An introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Fujimura, J. H. (1992). Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects and ‘translation’. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 168–211). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gash, D. M. (1984). Neural transplants in mammals: A historical overview. In J. R. Sladek & D. M. Gash (Eds.), Neural transplants: Development and function (pp. 1–12). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gash, D. M., & Sladek, J. R., Jr. (Eds.). (1988). Transplantation into the mammalian CNS: Based on the Schmitt Symposium on Transplantation into the Mammalian Central Nervous System, held June 30 – July 3, 1987 in Rochester, NY. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  32. Gash, D. M., Collier, T. J., et al. (1985). Neural transplantation: A review of recent developments and potential applications to the aged brain. Neurobiology of Aging, 6(2), 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gillon, R. (1996). Brain transplantation, personal identity and medical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 22(3), 131–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goldstein, J. (2011). Parfit’s concept of personal identity and its implications for intercerebral stem cell transplants. In H. Fangerau, J. Fegert, & T. Trapp (Eds.), Implanted minds. The neuroethics of intracerebral stem cell transplantation and deep brain stimulation (pp. 15–30). Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  35. Goldstein, J. (2013). Personale Identität und intrazerebrale Stammzelltransplantationen. Diss. Med. Fac. Ulm University.Google Scholar
  36. Greene, M., Schill, K., et al. (2005). Ethics: Moral issues of human-non-human primate neural grafting. Science, 309(5733), 385–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Grisolia, J. S. (2002). CNS stem cell transplantation: Clinical and ethical perspectives. Brain Research Bulletin, 57(6), 823–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hess, P. (2012). Intracranial stem cell-based transplantation: Reconsidering the ethics of phase 1 clinical trials in light of irreversible interventions in the brain. AJOB Neuroscience, 3(2), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoffer, B. J., & Olson, L. (1991). Ethical issues in brain-cell transplantation. Trends in Neurosciences, 14(8), 384–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. J. D. (1891, March 1). Brain transplantation. New York Times, 18.Google Scholar
  41. Jones, D. G. (1991). Fetal neural transplantation: Placing the ethical debate within the context of society’s use of human material. Bioethics, 5(1), 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jones, E. G., & Mendell, L. M. (1999). Assessing the decade of the brain. Science, 284(5415), 739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lindvall, O. (1991). Prospects of transplantation in human neurodegenerative diseases. Trends in Neurosciences, 14(8), 376–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lindvall, O., Björklund, A., et al. (1991). Intracerebral transplantation in movement disorders: Experimental basis and clinical experiences (Proceedings of the 20th Fernström symposium, Lund, Sweden, 1990). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  45. Low, W. C., Lewis, P. R., et al. (1982). Function recovery following neural transplantation of embryonic septal nuclei in adult rats with septohippocampal lesions. Nature, 300(5889), 260–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mahowald, M. B., Areen, J., et al. (1987). Transplantation of neural tissue from fetuses. Science, 235(4794), 1307–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martin, M., & Fangerau, H. (2006). Die Bedeutung unterschiedlicher Textsorten für die Repräsentation von Wissensverschiebungen in der Medizingeschichte. In J. Vögele, H. Fangerau, & T. Noack (Eds.), Geschichte der Medizin – Geschichte in der Medizin – Forschungsperspektiven (pp. 153–162). Münster: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
  48. McCullagh, P. (1988). Fetal brain transplantation – The scope of the ethical issue. Ethics & Medicine: A Christian Perspective on Issues in Bioethics, 4(3), 37–39.Google Scholar
  49. Merkel, R., Boer, G. J., et al. (Eds.). (2007). Intervening in the brain: Changing psyche and society (Ethics of science and technology assessment). Berlin/New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Moreira, T., & Palladino, P. (2005). Between truth and hope: On Parkinson’s disease, neurotransplantation and the production of the ‘self’. History of the Human Sciences, 18(3), 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Morrison, K. E. (1987). Brain transplantation – Still fantasy? Discussion paper. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 80(7), 441–444.Google Scholar
  52. Moss, M. B., & Rosene, D. L. (1985). Neural transplantation – A panacea. Neurobiology of Aging, 6(2), 168–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Northoff, G. (1996). Do brain tissue transplants alter personal identity? Inadequacies of some “standard” arguments. Journal of Medical Ethics, 22(3), 174–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Paul, N. W. (2003). Risiko, Sicherheit, Nutzen und Strategien zur Implementierung von Gentherapien 1980–2000. In A. Labisch & N. W. Paul (Eds.), Historizität: Erfahrung und Handeln, Geschichte und Medizin (pp. 201–210). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
  55. Rehncrona, S. (1997). A critical review of the current status and possible developments in brain transplantation. In F. Cohadon, V. V. Dolenc, J. L. Antunes, et al. (Eds.), Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery (Vol. 23, pp. 3–46). Vienna: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rogers, J., Zornetzer, S. F., et al. (1985). Therapeutic applications of neural transplant technology. Neurobiology of Aging, 6(2), 169–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sanberg, P. R. (1990). Students’ views on fetal neural tissue transplantation. Lancet, 335(8705), 1594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thompson, W. G. (1890). Successful brain grafting. New York Medical Journal, 51, 701–702.Google Scholar
  59. U.S. Congress. Office of Technology Assessment (Ed.). (1990). Neural grafting: Repairing the brain and spinal cord, OTA-BA-462. Washington, DC: U.S., Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  60. Wade, N. (2005, July 15). Ethicists offer advice for testing human brain cells in primates. New York Times, A12.Google Scholar
  61. Wallace, R. B., & Das, G. D. (Eds.). (1983). Neural tissue transplantation research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  62. White, R. J. (1985). Brain transplantation. Surgical Neurology, 23(4), 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. White, R. J. (1992). Fetal brain transplantation: Questionable human experiment. America (NY), 167(17), 421–422.Google Scholar
  64. Wilberger, J. E. (1983). Transplantation of central nervous tissue. Neurosurgery, 13(1), 90–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of History, Philosophy and Ethics of MedicineUniversity of UlmUlmGermany
  2. 2.History, Philosophy, and Ethics of MedicineJohannes Gutenberg University Medical CenterMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations