Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Improving Performance Through Brain–Computer Interface

Reference work entry


Novel neurotechnologies, such as brain-computer interfaces (BCI), are generating significant scientific and popular interest. A certain BCI technology, neurofeedback (NF), is increasingly used for managing the symptoms of many conditions, most notably attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Although growing evidence suggests that the method is promising, there is no consensus in the scientific literature about its efficacy, and different sources offer contradictory evaluations. Although neurofeedback has received comparatively little scholarly attention from ethicists, it presents numerous dilemmas that warrant consideration. While the method is already widely used and its acceptability can be expected to grow, the precise mechanism of action and possible adverse effects of neurofeedback are poorly understood at present. The current regulatory landscape of neurofeedback devices seems inadequate, and in particular, the growing commercialization of BCIs and lack of oversight over EEG-based toys and games present a challenge for neuroethical analysis. After a brief discussion of ADHD, and the emergence of neurofeedback, this chapter provides an overview of assessments of NF’s efficacy and a brief survey of some of the ethical and social aspects of the method for pediatric ADHD. The questions covered include adverse effects, regulation, responsible communication, identity considerations, and the enhancement use of BCIs.


Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Symptom Work Memory Training Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Patient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2011). ADHD: Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 128, 1007–1022. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-2107B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold, L. E., Lofthouse, N., Hersch, S., Pan, X., Hurt, E., Bates, B., Kassouf, K., Moone, S., & Grantier, C. (2013). EEG neurofeedback for ADHD: Double-blind sham-controlled randomized pilot feasibility trial. Journal of Attention Disorders, 17, 410–419 [first published on May 22, 2012].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arns, M., de Ridder, S., Strehl, U., Breteler, M., & Coenen, A. (2009). Efficacy of neurofeedback treatment in ADHD: The effects on inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity: A meta-analysis. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 40(3), 180–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baum, M. (2011). “Focus Pocus” and beyond: Consumer brain computer interfaces for health, self-improvement and fun. Practical Ethics Blog, University of Oxford
  5. Berger, T. W., Chapin, J. K., Gerhardt, G. A., McFarland, D. J., Principe, J. C., Soussou, W. V., Taylor, D. M., & Tresco, P. A. (2008). Brain-Computer interfaces: An international assessment of research and development trends. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Birbaumer, N. (1999). Slow cortical potentials: Plasticity, operant control, and behavioral effects. The Neuroscientist, 5, 74–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Birbaumer, N., Ramos Muguialday, A., Weber, C., & Montoya, P. (2009). Neurofeedback and brain-computer interface clinical applications. International Review of Neurobiology, 86, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borck, C. (2005). Hirnströme. EineKulturgeschichte der elektroenzephalographie. Göttingen: Wallstein.Google Scholar
  9. Bradley, C. (1937). The behavior of children receiving benzedrine. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 94, 577–585.Google Scholar
  10. Brenninkmeijer, J. (2010). Taking care of one’s brain: How manipulating the brain changes people’s selves. History of the Human Sciences, 23(1), 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Budzynski, T. H. (1999). From EEG to neurofeedback. In J. R. Evans & A. Abarbanel (Eds.), Introduction to quantitative EEG and neurofeedback. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  12. Budzynski, T. H., Budzynski, H. K., Evans, J. R., & Abarbanel, A. (Eds.). (2009). Introduction to quantitative EEG and neurofeedback. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cantor, D. S. (1999). An overview of quantitative EEG and its applications to neurofeedback. In J. R. Evans & A. Abarbanel (Eds.), Introduction to quantitative EEG and neurofeedback. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  14. Caplan, A. (2013). Accepting a helping hand can be the right thing to do. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39, 367–368. doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). Increasing prevalence of parent-reported attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder among children: United States, 2003 and 2007. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 59, 1439–1443.Google Scholar
  16. Chabot, R. J., di Michele, F., & Prichep, L. (2005). The role of quantitative electroencephalography in child and adolescent psychiatric disorders. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 14(1), 21–53, v-vi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clausen, J. (2008). Moving minds: Ethical aspects of neural motorprostheses. Biotechnology Journal, 3(12), 1493–1501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clausen, J. (2009). Man, machine and in between. Nature, 457(7233), 1080–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cole, E. (2007). Direct brain-to-game interface worries scientists. In Wired Magazine, September 5.
  20. Demos, J. N. (2005). Getting started with neurofeedback. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  21. Desney, T. S., & Nijholt, A. (Eds.). (2010). Brain-computer interfaces: Applying our minds to human-computer interaction. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Dornhege, G., Millán, J. D. R., Hinterberger, T., McFarland, D. J., & Müller, K. R. (Eds.). (2007). Toward brain-computer interfacing. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Egner, T., & Gruzelier, J. H. (2003). Ecological validity of neurofeedback: Modulation of slow wave EEG enhances musical performance. Neuroreport, 14(9), 1221–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ellison, K. (2010). Neurofeedback gains popularity and lab attention. In The New York Times, October 4.
  25. Evans, J. R., & Abarbanel, A. (Eds.). (1999). Introduction to quantitative EEG and neurofeedback. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Farah, M. J. (2011). Neuroscience and neuroethics in the 21st century. In J. Illes & B. J. Sahakian (Eds.), Oxford handbook of neuroethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Finger, S. (1994). Origins of neuroscience: A history of explorations in brain function. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Foks, M. (2005). Neurofeedback training as an educational intervention in a school setting: How the regulation of arousal states can lead to improved attention and behavior in children with special needs. Educational and Child Psychology, 22(3), 67–77.Google Scholar
  29. Frank, M. G. (2009). Brain rhythms. In M. D. Binder, H. Nobutaka, & U. Windhorst (Eds.), Encyclopedia of neuroscience (pp. 482–483). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fuchs, T., Birbaumer, N., Lutzenberger, W., Gruzelier, J. H., & Kaiser, J. (2003). Neurofeedback treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children: A comparison with methylphenidate. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 28(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Garfield, C. F., Dorsey, R., Zhu, S., Huskamp, H. A., Conti, R., Dusetzina, S. B., Higashi, A., Perrin, J. M., Kornfield, R., & Alexander, G. C. (2012). Trends in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ambulatory diagnosis and medical treatment in the United States, 2000–2010. Academic Pediatrics, 12, 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Giordano, J., & DuRousseau, D. (2011). Toward right and good use of brain-machine interfacing neurotechnologies: Ethical issues and implications for guidelines and policy. Cognitive Technology, 15(2), 5–10.Google Scholar
  33. Giordano, J., & Olds, J. (2010). On the interfluence of neuroscience, neuroethics and legal and social issues: The need for (N)ELSI. American Journal of Bioethics-Neuroscience, 1(4), 12–14.Google Scholar
  34. Gruzelier, J., Egner, T., & Vernon, D. (2006). Validating the efficacy of neurofeedback for optimising performance. Progress in Brain Research, 159, 421–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gualtieri, C. T., & Johnson, L. G. (2005). ADHD: Is objective diagnosis possible? Psychiatry (Edgmont), 2(11), 44–53.Google Scholar
  36. Hammond, D. C. (2011). What is neurofeedback: An update. Journal of Neurotherapy, 15, 305–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heinrich, H., Gevensleben, H., Freisleder, F. J., Moll, G. H., & Rothenberger, A. (2004). Training of slow cortical potentials in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Evidence for positive behavioral and neurophysiological effects. Biological Psychiatry, 55, 772–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hildt, E. (2010). Brain-computer interaction and medical access to the brain: Individual, social and ethical implications. Studies in Ethics, Law and Technology, 4, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hirshberg, L. M., Chiu, S., & Frazier, J. A. (2005). Emerging brain-based interventions for children and adolescents: Overview and clinical perspective. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 14, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hodgson, K., Hutchinson, A. D., & Denson, L. (2012). Nonpharmacological treatments for 810 ADHD: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Attention Disorders, 20(10), 1–8.Google Scholar
  41. Hyman, S. E. (2013). Might stimulant drugs support moral agency in ADHD children?. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(6), 369–370.Google Scholar
  42. Jasper, H. H., Solomon, P., & Bradley, C. (1938). Electroencephalographic analysis of behavior problems in children. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 95, 641–658.Google Scholar
  43. Jensen, P. S., Arnold, L. E., Swanson, J. M., et al. (2007). 3-year follow-up of the NIMH MTA study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 46(8), 989–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. John, E. R., Prichep, L. S., Ahn, H., Easton, P., Fridman, J., & Kaye, H. (1983). Neurometric evaluation of cognitive dysfunctions and neurological disorders in children. Progress in Neurobiology, 21, 239–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kamiya, J. (1968). Conscious control of brain waves. Psychology Today, 1, 56–60.Google Scholar
  46. Keizer, A. W., Verment, R. S., & Hommel, B. (2010). Enhancing cognitive control through neurofeedback: A role of gamma-band activity in managing episodic retrieval. NeuroImage, 49(4), 3404–3413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kennedy, P. (2011). The cyborg in us all. In The New York Times, September 14.
  48. Kropotov, J. D. (2009). Quantitative EEG, event-related potentials and neurotherapy. Amsterdam: Academic.Google Scholar
  49. La Vaque, T. J., & Rossiter, T. (2001). The ethical use of placebo controls in clinical research: The Declaration of Helsinki. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 26(1), 23–37; discussion 61–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Leins, U., Goth, G., Hinterberger, T., Klinger, C., Rumpf, N., & Strehl, U. (2007). Neurofeedback for children with ADHD: A comparison of SCP and theta/beta protocols. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 32, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lindsley, D. B., & Cutts, K. N. (1940). Electroencephalograms of “constitutionally inferior” and behavior problem children. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 44(6), 1199–1212. doi:10.1001/archneurpsyc.1940.02280120046003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lofthouse, N., Arnold, L. E., Hersch, S., Hurt, E., & DeBeus, R. (2012a). A review of neurofeedback treatment for pediatric ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 16(5), 351–372. doi:10.1177/1087054711427530. Epub 2011 Nov 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lofthouse, N., Arnold, L. E., & Hurt, E. (2012b). Current status of neurofeedback for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Current Psychiatry Reports, 14, 536–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Loo, S. K., & Brakley, R. A. (2005). Clinical utility of EEG in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Applied Neuropsychology, 12(2), 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Loo, S. K., & Makeig, S. (2012). Clinical utility of EEG in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A research update. Neurotherapeutics, 9, 569–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lubar, J. O., & Lubar, J. F. (1984). Electroencephalographic biofeedback of SMR and beta for treatment of attention deficit disorders in a clinical setting. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 9, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lubar, J. F., & Shouse, M. N. (1976). EEG and behavioral changes in a hyperkinetic child concurrent with training of the sensorimotor rhythm (SMR): A preliminary report. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 1(3), 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Marcus, D. K., & Barry, T. D. (2011). Does attention-eeficit/hyperactivity disorder have a dimensional latent structure? A taxometric analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120(2), 427–442. doi:10.1037/a0021405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Molina, B. S. G., Hinshaw, S. P., Swanson, J. M., Arnold, L. E., Vitiello, B., Jensen, P. S., Epstein, J. N., Hoza, B., Hechtman, L., Abikoff, H. B., Elliott, G. R., Greenhill, L. L., Newcorn, J. H., Wells, K. C., Wigal, T., Gibbons, R. D., Hur, K., Houck, P. R., & The MTA Cooperative Group. (2009). The MTA at 8 years: Prospective follow-up of children treated for combined type ADHD in a multisite study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 48(5), 484–500. doi:10.1097/CHI.0b013e31819c23d0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Monastra, V. J. (2005). Electroencephalographic biofeedback (neurotherapy) as a treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Rationale and empirical foundation. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 14, 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Monastra, V. J., Lubar, J. F., Linden, M., VanDeusen, P., Green, G., Wing, W., Phillips, A., & Fenger, T. N. (1999). Assessing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder via quantitative electroencephalography: An initial validation study. Neuropsychology, 13(3), 424–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Monastra, V. J., Lynn, S., Linden, M., Lubar, J. F., Gruzelier, J., & LaVaque, T. J. (2005). Electroencephalographic biofeedback in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 30(2), 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nijboer F., Allison, B. Z., Dunne, S., Plass-Oude Bos, D., Nijholt, A., & Haselager, P. (2011) A preliminary survey on the perception of marketability of brain-computer interfaces and initial development of a repository of BCI companies. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Brain-Computer Interfaces, Technological University Graz, pp. 344–347.Google Scholar
  64. Nowlis, D. P., & Kamiya, J. (1970). The control of electroencephalographic alpha rhythms through auditory feedback and the associated mental activity. Psychophysiology, 6, 476–484. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1970.tb01756.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2013) Novel neurotechnologies: intervening in the brain. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.Google Scholar
  66. Ochs, S. (2004). A history of nerve function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Plischke, H., DuRousseau, D., & Giordano, J. (2011). EEG-based neurofeedback: The promise of neurotechnology and need for neuroethically informed guidelines and policies. Ethics in Biology, Engineering & Medicine – An International Journal, 2(3), 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Polanczyk, G., de Lima, M. S., Horta, B. L., et al. (2007). The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: A systematic review and metaregression analysis. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 942–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rothenberger, A., & Rothenberger, L. G. (2012). Updates on treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Facts, comments, and ethical considerations. Current Treatment Options in Neurology, 14(6), 594–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rutger, J. V., Steines, D., Szibbo, D., Kübler, A., Schneider, M.-J., Haselager, P., & Nijboer, F. (2012). Ethical issues in brain–computer interface research, development, and dissemination. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, 36(2), 94–99. doi:10.1097/NPT.0b013e31825064cc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Satterfield, J. H., Cantwell, D. P., Saul, R. E., Lesser, L. I., & Podosin, R. L. (1973). Response to stimulant drug treatment in hyperactive children: Prediction from EEG and neurological findings. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 3(1), 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shouse, M. N., & Lubar, J. F. (1979). Operant conditioning of EEG rhythms and Ritalin in the treatment of hyperkinesis. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 4(4), 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Singh, I. (2002a). Bad boys, good mothers and the ‘miracle’ of Ritalin. Science in Context, 15(4), 577–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Singh, I. (2002b). Biology in context: Social and cultural perspectives on ADHD. Children and Society, 16, 360–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Singh, I. (2008). Beyond polemics: Science and ethics of ADHD. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 957–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Singh, I. (2012). VOICES study: Final report. London, UK.Google Scholar
  77. Singh, I. (2013). Not robots: Children’s perspectives on authenticity, moral agency and stimulant drug treatments. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(6), 359–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Oxford: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
  79. Skinner, B. F. (1963). Operant behavior. The American Psychologist, 18(8), 503–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sterman, M. B., Wyrwicka, W., & Howe, R. (1969). Behavioral and neurophysiological studies of the sensorimotor rhythm in the cat. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 27, 678–679.Google Scholar
  81. Strehl, U., Leins, U., & Goth, G. (2006). Self-regulation of slow cortical potentials: A new treatment for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics, 118, 1530–1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Striefel, S. (2009). Ethics in neurofeedback practice. In T. H. Budzynski, H. K. Budzynski, J. R. Evans, & A. Abarbanel (Eds.), Introduction to quantitative EEG and neurofeedback. Amsterdam: Academic.Google Scholar
  83. Swanson, J. M., Kraemer, H. C., Hinshaw, S. P., Arnold, L. E., Conners, C. K., Abikoff, H. B., et al. (2001). Clinical relevance of the primary findings of the MTA: Success rates based on severity of ADHD & ODD symptoms at the end of treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 168–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Swanson, J. M., Wigal, T., & Lakes, K. (2009). DSM-V and the future diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Current Psychiatry Reports, 11(5), 399–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tamburrini, G. (2009). Brain to computer communication: Ethical perspectives on interaction models. Neuroethics, 2, 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Thatcher, R. W. (1999). EEG database guided neurotherapy. In J. R. Evans & A. Abarbanel (Eds.), Introduction to quantitative EEG and neurofeedback. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  87. Thatcher, R. W., & Lubar, J. F. (2009). History of the scientific standards of QEEG normative databases. In T. H. Budzynski, H. K. Budzynski, J. R. Evans, & A. Abarbanel (Eds.), Introduction to quantitative EEG and neurofeedback. Amsterdam: Academic.Google Scholar
  88. van Erp, J. B. F., Lotte, F., & Tangermann, M. (2012). Brain-computer interfaces: Beyond medical applications. Computer, 45, 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. van Est, R., van Keulen, I., Geesink, I., Schuijff, M., van den Besselaar, P., Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., Merkx, F., Gurney, T., & van Koten, R. (2010). Making perfect life: Bio-engineering (in) the 21st century. Brussels: Rathenau Instituut.Google Scholar
  90. Vernon, D. J. (2005). Can neurofeedback training enhance performance? An evaluation of the evidence with implications for future research. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 30(4), 347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Weiss, M. D., Baer, S., Allan, A. B., Saran, K., & Schibuk, H. (2011). The screens culture: Impact on ADH. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders, 3, 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. World Medical Association. (2000). The declaration of Helsinki. 52nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland. Retrieved from
  93. WWK. (2008). What we know: AD/HD and neurofeedback: A review of eight studies by the National Resource Center on AD/HD.
  94. Yucha, C., & Gilbert, C. (2004). Evidence based practice in biofeedback & neurofeedback. Wheat Ridge: AAPB.Google Scholar
  95. Zander, T. O., & Kothe, C. (2011). Towards passive brain–computer interfaces: Applying brain-computer interface technology to human–machine systems in general. Journal of Neural Engineering, 8(2), 025005.Google Scholar
  96. Zuvekas, S. H., & Vitiello, B. (2012). Stimulant medication use in children: A 12-year perspective. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 169, 160–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.London School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Social Science, Health & MedicineKing’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations