No Excuses: Performance Mistakes in Morality

Reference work entry

Abstract

Philosophical accounts of moral responsibility are standardly framed by two platitudes. According to them, blame requires the presence of a moral defect in the agent and the absence of excuses. In this chapter, this kind of approach is challenged. It is argued that (a) people sometimes violate moral norms due to performance mistakes, (b) it often appears reasonable to hold them responsible for it, and (c) their mistakes cannot be traced to their moral qualities or to the presence of excuses. In the end, the implications for discussions of moral responsibility are discussed.

Associated Press report Posted: 01/25/2013 08:18:46 AM MSTCOLONIE, N.Y. (AP) – Authorities say a New York man who left his 1-year-old son in his car for eight hours in frigid weather only realized his mistake after a call from his wife. Police in the Albany suburb of Colonie say the man forgot to drop off his son at day care and left the child strapped in the backseat of the car when he parked outside his office Thursday morning.

Keywords

Moral Responsibility Moral Reason Situational Factor Negative Condition Moral Norm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adams, R. (1985). Involuntary sins. Philosophical Review, 94, 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alfano, M., & Fairweather, A. (2013). Situationism and virtue theory. Oxford Bibliographies in Philosophy.Google Scholar
  3. Amaya, S. (2013). Slips. Noûs, 47(3), 559–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amaya, S. (in preparation). Without belief. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  5. Austin, J. L. (1962). A plea for excuses. In J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock (Eds.), Austin, philosophical papers (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baron, M. (2007). Excuses, excuses. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 1, 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumeister, R. (1984). Choking under pressure: selfconsciousness and paradoxical effects of incentiveson skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, pp. 610–620.Google Scholar
  8. Beilock, S. (2007). Choking under pressure. In R. Baumesiter & K. Vohs. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Social Psychology, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 140–141.Google Scholar
  9. Brand, R. (1958). Blameworthiness and obligation. In A. I. Melden (Ed.), Essays in moral philosophy (pp. 3–39). Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brink. D. (2013). Situationism, responsibility, and fair opportunity. Social Philosophy and Policy.Google Scholar
  11. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Broadbent, D. E., Broadbent, M., & Jones, L. (1986). Correlates of cognitive failure. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of B.F. Skinner’s verbal behavior. Language, 35(l), 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chomsky, N. (1964). Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  16. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Coffman, E. J. (2007). Thinking about luck. Synthese, 158, 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen, S. (1978). Environmental load and the allocation of attention. In A. Baum, J. Singer, & S. Vain (Eds.), Advances in environmental psychology. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Cohen, S., & Spacapan, S. (1984). The social psychology of noise. In D. M. Jones & A. J. Chapman (Eds.), Noise and society (pp. 221–245). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Collins, J. (2006). Crime and parenthood: The uneasy case of prosecuting negligent parents. Northwestern University School of Law, 100, 807–856.Google Scholar
  21. Darley, J. M., & Batson, C. D. (1973). From Jerusalem to Jericho: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Díaz, C., & Pedrero, A. (2006). Sound exposure during daily activities. Applied Acoustics, 67, 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Doris, J. M. (2002). Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Doris, J. M. (2005). Replies: Evidence and sensibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 71, 656–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Doris, J. M. (2009). Skepticism about persons. Philosophical Issues, 19, 57–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Doris, J. M. (2014). Talking to ourselves. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Doris, J. M., Knobe, J., & Woolfolk, R. (2007). Variantism about responsibility. Philosophical Perspectives, 27, 183–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Doris, J. M., & Murphy, D. (2007). From my lai to Abu Grahib: the moral psychology of atrocity. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 31(1), 25–55.Google Scholar
  29. Fischer, H. (2006). My way: Essays on moral responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Fischer, J., & Ravizza, M. (1998). Responsibility and control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Franklin, C. (2011). A theory of the normative force of pleas. Philosophical Studies. doi:10.1007/s11098-011-9826-y.Google Scholar
  32. Harman, G. (1999). Moral philosophy and linguistics. In K. Brinkman (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th world congress of philosophy (pp. 107–115). Bowling Green: Philosophy Documentation Center.Google Scholar
  33. Jónsdóttir, M., Adólfsdóttir, S., Cortez, R. D., Gunnarsdóttir, M., & Gústafsdóttir, H. (2007). A diary study of action slips in healthy individuals. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 875–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lackey, J. (2008). What luck is not. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 86, 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lashley, K. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior. The Hixon symposium (pp. 112–136). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Latané, B., & Darley, J. (1970). The Unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  37. Latané, B., & Rodin, J. (1969). A lady in distress: Inhibiting effects of friends and strangers on bystander information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Levy, N. (2011). Hard luck: How luck undermines free will and responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mallon, R. (2008). Reviving Rawls’s linguistic analogy inside and out. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 145–156). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Matthews, K., & Cannon, L. (1975). Environmental noise level as a determinant of helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 571–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McKenna, M. (2001). Review of “Responsibility and control: A theory of moral responsibility”. Journal of Philosophy, 98, 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McKenna, M. (2012). Conversation and responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McLaren, C., Null, J., & Quinn, J. (2005). Heat stress from enclosed vehicles: Moderate ambient temperatures cause significant temperature rise in enclosed vehicles. Pediatrics, 116, e109–e112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Merrit, M., Doris, J. M., & Harman, G. (2010). Character. In J. M. Doris & The Moral Psychology Groups (Eds.), Moral psychology handbook (pp. 354–400). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Mikhail, J. (2010). Elements of moral cognition: Rawls’ linguistic analogy and the cognitive science of moral and legal judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.Google Scholar
  46. Miller, C. (2003). Social psychology and virtue ethics. The Journal of Ethics, 7, 365–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miller, C. (2013). Moral character: An empirical theory. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 56–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Morris, P. E. (1984). The validity of subjective reports. In J. Harris & P. Morris (Eds.), Everyday memory, actions, and absent-mindedness (pp. 173–190). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  50. Nagel, T. (1976). Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 50, 137–151.Google Scholar
  51. Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Nahmias, E. (2007). Autonomous agency and social psychology. In M. Maraffa, M. De Caro, & F. Ferretti (Eds.), Cartographies of the mind (pp. 169–185). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Neizel, R., Gershon, R., Zeltser, M., Canton, A., & Akram, M. (2009). Noise levels associated with New York City’s mass transit systems. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 1393–1399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nelkin, D. (2005). Freedom, responsibility, and the challenge of situationism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 29, 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nelkin, D. (2011). Making sense of freedom and responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Nelkin, D. (2013). Moral luck. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.). Retrieved from The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2013 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/moral-luck/
  57. Norman, D. (1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical explorations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Pritchard, D. (2005). Epistemic luck. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Raz, J. (2010). Being in the world. Ratio, 23, 433–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Reason, J. (1984). Lapses of attention in everyday life. In R. Parasuraman & D. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 515–549). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  62. Reason, J. (1988). Stress and cognitive failure. In S. Fisher & J. Reason (Eds.), Handbook of life stress, cognition, and health (pp. 405–421). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  63. Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Reason, J. (1993). Self-report questionnaires in cognitive psychology: Have they delivered the goods? In A. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention: selection, awareness, and control (pp. 406–424). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  65. Reason, J., & Mycielska, K. (1982). Absent-mindedness? Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  66. Roedder, E., & Harman, G. (2010). Linguistics and moral theory. In J. M. Doris (Ed.), The moral psychology handbook (pp. 273–296). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rosebury, B. (1995). Moral responsibility and “moral luck”. The Philosophical Review, 104, 499–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Scanlon, T. (1998). What we owe to each other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Sellen, A. J. (1990). Mechanisms of human error and human error detection. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
  71. Sher, G. (2006). In praise of blame. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Sher, G. (2009). Who knew? Responsibility without awareness. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shoemaker, D. (2011). Attributability, answerability, and accountability: Toward a wider theory of moral responsibility. Ethics, 121, 602–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Smith, A. (2005). Responsibility for attitudes: Activity and passivity in mental Life. Ethics, 115(2), 236–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Strawson, P. F. (1962/1982). Freedom and resentment. In G. Watson (Ed.), Free will. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Strawson, G. (2000). The unhelpfulness of determinism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 60, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vargas, M. (2013a). Building better beings: A theory of moral responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vargas, M. (2013b). Situationism and responsibility: Free will in fragments. In T. Vierkant, J. Kiverstein, & A. Clark (Eds.), Decomposing the will (pp. 400–416). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Wallace, R. J. (1994). Responsibility and the moral sentiments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Watson, G. (1996). Two faces of responsibility. Philosophical Topics, 24, 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Weingarten, G. (2009). Fatal distraction. The Washington Post, March 08, 2009. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2009/02/27/AR2009022701549.html. Retrieved 1 Feb 2010.
  82. Williams, B. (1976). Moral Luck. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 50, 115–135.Google Scholar
  83. Wolff, S. (1990). Freedom within reason. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Wood, N. L., & Cowan, N. (1995). The cocktail party phenomenon re- visited: Attention and memory in the classic selective listening procedure of Cherry (1953). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 255–260.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversidad de los AndesBogotáColombia
  2. 2.Philosophy-Neuroscience-Psychology Program and Philosophy DepartmentWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations