Advertisement

Vernal Pools of Northeastern North America

  • Elizabeth A. Colburn
  • Aram J. K. Calhoun
Reference work entry

Abstract

Vernal pools of northeastern North America are small, seasonally flooded wetlands found in forested areas. They are defined by features such as length and timing of flooding and their biological community. Most reach their maximum depth and volume each spring and draw down during the summer. Their importance as habitat for some amphibians and invertebrates, and the unique adaptations of the fauna, make vernal pools of interest for conservation, education, and research.

Keywords

Temporary ponds, pools or waters Seasonal pools or ponds Forest ponds Amphibians Aquatic macroinvertebrates Hydroperiod Biodiversity Conservation 

References

  1. Baldwin RF, Calhoun AJK, deMaynadier PG. Conservation planning for amphibian species with complex habitat requirements: a case study using movements and habitat selection of the wood frog Rana sylvatica. J Herpetol. 2006;40:442–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bärlocher F, Mackay RJ, Wiggins GB. Detritus processing in a temporary vernal pool in southern Ontario. Arch Hydrobiol. 1978;81:269–95.Google Scholar
  3. Batzer DP, Sion KA. In: Batzer DP, Rader RB, Wissinger SA, editors. Invertebrates in freshwater wetlands of North America. New York: Wiley; 1999.Google Scholar
  4. Batzer DP, Palik BJ, Buech R. Relationships between environmental characteristics and macroinvertebrate communities in seasonal woodland ponds of Minnesota. J N Am Benthol Soc. 2004;23:50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biebighauser TR. A guide to creating vernal ponds. Morehead: U.S.D.A. Forest Service; 2003. 36 p.Google Scholar
  6. Brodman R. Ambystoma laterale, blue-spotted Salamander. In: Lannoo M, editor. Amphibian declines: the conservation status of United States species. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2005. p. 614–16.Google Scholar
  7. Brooks RT. Annual and seasonal variation and the effects of hydroperiod on benthic macroinvertebrates of seasonal forest (“vernal”) ponds in central Massachusetts. Wetlands. 2000;20:707–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calhoun AJK, deMaynadier PG. Forestry habitat management guidelines for vernal pool wildlife in Maine. Rye (NY): Wildlife Conservation Society Technical Paper #6; 2004.Google Scholar
  9. Calhoun AJK, deMaynadier PG. Science and conservation of vernal pools in Northeastern North America. New York: CRC Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  10. Calhoun AJK, Klemens MW. Pool-breeding amphibians in residential and commercial developments in the Northeastern United States. Rye (NY): Wildlife Conservation Society Technical Paper #5; 2002.Google Scholar
  11. Calhoun AJK, Arrigoni J, Brooks RP, Hunter Jr ML, Richter SP. Creating successful vernal pools: a literature review and advice for practitioners. Wetlands. 2014a;34:1027–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Calhoun AJK, Jansujwicz JS, Bell KP, Hunter Jr ML. Improving management of small natural features on private lands by negotiating the science-policy boundary. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014b;111:11002–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Capps KA, Rancatti R, Tomczyk N, Parr T, Calhoun AJK, Hunter M. Biogeochemical hotspots in forested landscapes: the role of vernal pools in denitrification and organic matter processing. Ecosystems. 2014;17:1455–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carpenter L, Stone J, Griffin CR. Accuracy of aerial photography for locating seasonal (vernal) pools in Massachusetts. Wetlands. 2011;31:573–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen MJ, Creed IF, Alexander L, Basu MB, Calhoun AJK, Craft C, D’Amico E, DeKeyser E, Fowler L, Golden HE, Jawitx JW, Kalla P, Kirkman LK, Lane CR, Lang M, Leibowitz SG, Lewis DB, Marton J, McLaughlin DL, Mushet DM, Raanan-Kliperwas H, Rains MC, Smith L, Walls SC. Do geographically isolated wetlands influence landscape functions? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(8):1978–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Colburn EA. Vernal pools: natural history and conservation. Blacksburg/Granville: McDonald and Woodward Publishing Co.; 2004. 426 p.Google Scholar
  17. Colburn EA. Ecosystems: temporary waters. In: Jorgensen SE, Fath BD, editors. Encyclopedia of ecology. 1st ed. Oxford: Elsevier B.V; 2008. p. 3517–28.Google Scholar
  18. Colburn EA, Weeks SC, Reed SK. Chapter 6. Diversity and ecology of vernal pool invertebrates. In: Calhoun AJK, deMaynadier PG, editors. Science and conservation of vernal pools in Northeastern North America. New York: CRC Press; 2008. p. 105–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet RF, Laroe ET. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. Washington (DC): U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program; 1979. Report FWS/OBS-79/31.Google Scholar
  20. Cutko A, Rawinski TJ. Flora of Northeastern vernal pools. In: Calhoun AJK, deMaynadier PG, editors. Science and conservation of vernal pools in Northeastern North America. New York: CRC Press; 2008. p. 71–104.Google Scholar
  21. Gibbons JW, Winne CT, Scott DE, Willson JD, Glaudas X, Andrews KM, Todd BD, Fedewa LA, Wilkinson L, Tsaliagos RN, Harper SJ, Greene JL, Tuberville TD, Metts BS, Dorcas ME, Nestor JP, Hound CAY, Akre T, Reed RN, Buhlmann KA, Norman J, Croshaw DA, Hagen D, Rothermel BB. Remarkable amphibian biomass and abundance in an isolated wetland: implications for wetland conservation. Conserv Biol. 2006;20:1457–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Higgins MJ, Merritt RW. Temporary woodland ponds in Michigan: invertebrate seasonal patterns and trophic relationships. In: Batzer DP, Rader RB, Wissinger SA, editors. Invertebrates in freshwater wetlands of North America. New York: Wiley; 1999. p. 279–98.Google Scholar
  23. Jansujwicz J, Calhoun AJK. Protecting natural resources on private lands: the role of collaboration in land-use planning. In: Trombulak S, Baldwin RF, editors. Protecting natural resources on private lands: the role of collaboration in land-use planning. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 205–33.Google Scholar
  24. Jansujwicz JS, Calhoun AJK, Lilieholm R. The Maine vernal pool mapping and assessment program: engaging municipal officials and private landowners in community-based citizen science. Environ Manag. 2013;52:1369–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Karraker NE, Gibbs JP. Amphibian production in forested landscapes in relation to wetland hydroperiod: a case study of vernal pools and beaver ponds. Biol Conserv. 2009;142:2293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kenk R. The animal life of temporary and permanent ponds in southern Michigan, Miscellaneous publications of the Museum of Zoology, vol. 71. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan; 1949.Google Scholar
  27. Kross CS, Richter SC. Species interactions in constructed wetlands result in population sinks for Wood Frogs while benefitting Eastern Newts. Wetlands. 2016;36:385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lathrop RG, Montesano P, Tesauro J, Zarate B. Statewide mapping and assessment of vernal pools: a New Jersey case study. J Environ Manage. 2005;76:230–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Leibowitz SG, Brooks RT. Hydrology and landscape connectivity of vernal pools. In: Calhoun AJK, DeMaynadier PW, editors. Science and conservation of vernal pools in Northeastern North America. New York: CRC Press; 2008. p. 31–54.Google Scholar
  30. Levesque V, Calhoun AJK, Bell KP. Turning contention into collaboration: engaging power, trust, and learning in collaborative networks. Soc Nat Resour. 2016;1:1.Google Scholar
  31. Mahaney WS, Klemens MW. In: Calhoun AJK, DeMaynadier PW, editors. Science and conservation of vernal pools in Northeastern North America. New York: CRC Press; 2008. p. 192–212.Google Scholar
  32. Marton JM, Creed IF, Lewis DB, Lane CR, Basu NB, Cohen MJ, Craft CB. Geographically isolated wetlands are important biogeochemical reactors on the landscape. BioScience. 2015;65:408–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McLaughlin DL, Kaplan DA, Cohen MJ. A significant nexus: geographically isolated wetlands influence landscape hydrology. Water Resour Res. 2014;50:7153–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mitchell JC, Golet FC, Skidds DE, Paton PWC. Prioritizing non-regulatory protection of vernal pools in the Queen’s River Watershed, Rhode Island. Final research report prepared for RI Department of Environmental Management. Office of Water Resources, and U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1. 2007. 91 p. http://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/benviron/water/wetlands/pdfs/queens.pdf
  35. Morgan DE, Calhoun AJK. Maine municipal guide to mapping and conserving vernal pools. Orono: Sustainability Solutions Initiative; 2014.Google Scholar
  36. Mushet DM, Calhoun AJK, Alexander LC, Cohen MJ, DeKeyser ES, Fowler L, Lane CR, Lang MW, Rains MC, Walls SC. Geographically isolated wetlands: rethinking a misnomer. Wetlands. 2015;35:423–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pierce BA. The effects of acid precipitation on amphibians. Ecotoxicology. 1993;2(1):65–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Pough FH, Wilson RE. Acid precipitation and reproductive success of Ambystoma salamanders. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on acid rain and the forest ecosystem. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report 23; 1976. p. 531–43.Google Scholar
  39. Rains MC, Leibowitz SG, Cohen MJ, Creed IF, Golden HE, Jawitz JW, Kalla P, Lane CR, Lang MG, McLaughlin L. Geographically isolated wetlands are part of the hydrological. Hydrol Process. 2016;30:153–60.Google Scholar
  40. Richardson JS, Mackay RJ. A comparison of the life history and growth of Limnephilus indivisus in three temporary pools. Arch Hydrobiol. 1984;99:515–28.Google Scholar
  41. Rittenhouse TAG, Semlitsch RD. Distribution of amphibians in terrestrial habitat surrounding wetlands. Wetlands. 2007;27:153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schneider DW. Snowmelt ponds in Wisconsin: influence of hydroperiod on invertebrate community structure. In: Batzer DP, Rader RB, Wissinger SA, editors. Invertebrates in freshwater wetlands of North America. New York: Wiley; 1999. p. 298–318.Google Scholar
  43. Semlitsch RD. Biological delineation of terrestrial buffer zones for salamanders. Conserv Biol. 1998;12:1113–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Semlitsch RD. Critical elements for biologically based recovery plans of aquatic-breeding amphibians. Conserv Biol. 2002;16:619–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Semlitsch RD, Skelly DK. Ecology and conservation of pool-breeding amphibians. In: Calhoun AJK, DeMaynadier PW, editors. Science and conservation of vernal pools in Northeastern North America. New York: CRC Press; 2008. p. 127–48.Google Scholar
  46. Semlitsch RD, Todd BD, Blomquist SM, Calhoun AJK, Gibbons JW, Gibbs JP, Graeter GJ, Harper EB, Hocking DJ, Hunter ML, Patrick DA. Effects of timber harvest on amphibian populations: understanding mechanisms from forest experiments. BioScience. 2009;59:853–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shelford VE. Animal communities in temperate America: as illustrated in the Chicago region: a study in animal ecology, Bulletin (Geographic Society of Chicago), vol. 5. Chicago: Chicago University Press; 1913.Google Scholar
  48. Shoop CR. Yearly variation in larval survival of Ambystoma maculatum. Ecology. 1974;55:440–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Skelly DK, Freidenburg LK, Kiesecker JM. Forest canopy and the performance of larval amphibians. Ecology. 2002;83(4):983–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sobczak R. Water resources office. Barnstable: Cape Cod Commission; 1999.Google Scholar
  51. Sobczak RV, Cambareri TC, Portnoy JW. Physical hydrology of selected vernal pools and kettle hole Ponds in the Cape Cod National Seashore, Massachusetts: Ground and Surface Water Interactions. Barnstable (MA) Water Resources Office, Cape Cod Commission; 2003. Report to the U. S. National Park Service, Water Rights Branch, Water Resources Division, Fort Collins, CO, and Cape Cod National Seashore, Wellfleet, MA.Google Scholar
  52. Sunding D, Terhorst J. Conserving endangered species through regulation of urban development: The Case of California Vernal Pools. Land Econ. 2014;90:290–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. U. S. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Hydrogeomorphic Wetland Classification System: An Overview and Modification to Better Meet the Needs of the Natural Resource Conservation Service. Washington (DC): US Department of Agriculture, NRCS; 2008. Technical Note No. 190-8-76.Google Scholar
  54. Vasconcelos D, Calhoun AJK. Monitoring created seasonal pools for functional success: a six-year case study of amphibian responses, Sears Island, Maine. USA Wetlands. 2006;26:992–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vermont Wetlands Bioassessment Program. An evaluation of the chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of seasonal pools and northern white cedar swamps and northern white cedar swamps. Final report. Montpelier: Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation and Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife, Nongame and Natural Heritage Program; 2003. 112 p.Google Scholar
  56. Wiggins GB. A contribution to the biology of caddisflies (Trichoptera) in temporary pools, Life sciences Contributions, vol. 88. Toronto: Royal Ontario Museum; 1973. 36 p.Google Scholar
  57. Wiggins GB, Mackay RJ, Smith IM. Evolutionary and ecological strategies of animals in annual temporary pools. Arch Hydrobiol Suppl. 1980;58(1,2):97–206.Google Scholar
  58. Williams DD. The ecology of temporary waters. Portland: Timber Press; 1987. 205 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Williams DD. The biology of temporary waters. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. 348 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Harvard Forest, Harvard UniversityPetershamUSA
  2. 2.University of MaineOronoUSA

Personalised recommendations