Major River Basins of the World

Reference work entry


River basins are the hydrological units of the planet and as such play a critical role in the natural functioning of the Earth. While there have been advances in mapping river basins to facilitate analyses and inform basin management, information on river flow volumes, condition of freshwater habitats and species, as well as the degree of impact on rivers and freshwater biodiversity are still lacking for many parts of the world. This lack of information and, mostly a lack of appreciation for the intrinsic value and role that rivers and wetlands play in the well-being of millions of people, makes their conservation and sustainable management challenging in the face of development pressures and climate change. This chapter summarizes current status and trends in freshwater biodiversity, identifies threats to aquatic ecosystems, provides information of the ecosystem value of wetlands, and makes the case for an improved, and more integrated management and conservation of wetlands.


River basins Freshwater Spatial data Biodiversity Ecosystem services Values Threats Protection Conservation 


  1. Abell R, Allan JD, Lehner B. Unlocking the potential of protected areas for freshwaters. Biol Cons. 2007;134:48–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen DJ, Smith KG, Darwall WRT, compilers. The status and distribution of freshwater biodiversity in Indo-Burma. Cambridge/Gland: IUCN; 2012.Google Scholar
  3. Balirwa J. Ecological, environmental and socioeconomic aspects of the Lake Victoria’s introduced Nile perch fishery in relation to the native fisheries and the species culture potential: lessons to learn. Afr J Ecol. 2007;45(2):120–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batker D, de la Torre I, Costanza R, Swedeen P, Day J, Boumans R, Bagstad K. Gaining ground. Wetlands, hurricanes and the economy: the value of restoring the Mississippi River Delta. Tacoma: Earth Economics; 2010.Google Scholar
  5. Berga L, Buil JM, Bofill E, De Cea JC, Garcia Perez JA, Manueco G, Polimon J, Soriano A, Yague J. Dams and reservoirs, societies and environment in the 21st century. London: Taylor and Francis Group; 2006 (1).Google Scholar
  6. Birkett CM, Mason IM. A new global lakes database for a remote sensing program studying climatically sensitive large lakes. J Great Lakes Res. 1995;21(3):307–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carrizo SF, Smith KG, Darwall WRT. Progress towards a global assessment of the status of freshwater fishes (Pisces) for the IUCN Red List: application to conservation programmes in zoos and aquariums. Int Zoo Yb. 2013;47:46–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. Water for food, water for life: a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. London/Colombo: Earthscan/International Water Management Institute; 2007.Google Scholar
  9. Collen B, Whitton F, Dyer EE, Baillie JEM, Cumberlidge N, Darwall WRT, Pollock C, Richman NI, Soulsby AM, Böhm M. Global patterns of freshwater species diversity, threat and endemism. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2014;23:40–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Darghouth S, Ward C, Gambarelli G, Styger E, Roux J. Watershed management approaches, policies, and operations: lessons for scaling up. Water sector board discussion paper series. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2008 (11).Google Scholar
  11. Darwall W, Smith K, Lowe T, Vié JC. The status and distribution of freshwater biodiversity in Eastern Africa. IUCN–Species Survival Commission Freshwater Biodiversity Assessment Programme. Gland: IUCN; 2005.Google Scholar
  12. Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata Z-I, Knowler DJ, Lévêque C, Naiman RJ, Prieur-Richard A-H, Soto D, Stiassny MLJ, Sullivan CA. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev. 2006;81:163–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eschmeyer WN, Fricke, R, van der Laan R, editors. Catalog of fishes online database. San Francisco: California Academy of Sciences; 2016. Available at: Accessed 23 Apr 2016.
  14. Eschmeyer WN, Fong JD. Species of fishes by family/subfamily. 2012. San Francisco: California Academy of Sciences. Available at: Accessed 23 Apr 2016.
  15. ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute). Digital chart of the world 1:1 Mio. Redlands: ESRI; 1993.Google Scholar
  16. FEOW. Freshwater ecoregions of the world; Washington, DC/Arlington: WWF and TNC; 2008.
  17. García N, Harrison I, Cox N, Tognelli MF, compilers. The status and distribution of freshwater biodiversity in the Arabian Peninsula. Gland/Cambridge, UK/Arlington: IUCN; 2015.Google Scholar
  18. Hoekstra JM, Molnar JL, Jennings M, Revenga C, Spalding MD, Boucher TM, Robertson JC, Heibel TJ, Ellison K. The atlas of global conservation: changes, challenges, and opportunities to make a difference. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  19. Hogan Z. Pangasianodon gigas. The IUCN Red List of threatened species 2013: e.T15944A5324699. 2013. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2011-1.RLTS.T15944A5324699.en. Accessed 16 Mar 2016.Google Scholar
  20. Hortle KG. Fisheries of the Mekong River Basin. In: Campbell IC, editor. The Mekong: biophysical environment of a transboundary river. New York: Elsevier; 2009. p. 199–253.Google Scholar
  21. IPCC. Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL, editors]. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press; 2014.Google Scholar
  22. IUCN. The IUCN Red List of threatened species. Version 2015-4. 2015. Accessed 16 Mar 2015.
  23. Jiménez Cisneros BE, Oki T, Arnell NW, Benito G, Cogley JG, Döll P, Jiang T, Mwakalila SS. 2014. Freshwater resources. In: Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL, editors]. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press; 2014.Google Scholar
  24. Kottelat M, Freyhof J. Handbook of European freshwater fishes. Cornol/Berlin: Kottelat/Freyhof; 2007.Google Scholar
  25. Lehner B, Grill G. Global river hydrography and network routing: baseline data and new approaches to study the world’s large river systems. Hydrol Process. 2013;27(15):2171–86. Data is available at Scholar
  26. LVFO. State of fish stocks. Jinja, Uganda: Lake Victoria Fisheries Organization; 2008.Google Scholar
  27. McDonald RI, Green P, Balk D, Fekete BM, Revenga C, Todd M, Montgomery M. Urban growth, climate change, and freshwater availability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(15):6312–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). Ecosystems and human well-being: wetlands and water synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute; 2005.Google Scholar
  29. Nilsson C, Reidy CA, Dynesius M, Revenga C. Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science. 2005;308(5720):405–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Poff NL, Brinson NM, Day Jr JW. Aquatic ecosystems and global climate change: potential impacts on inland freshwater and coastal wetland ecosystems in the United States. Arlington: Pew Center on Global Climate Change; 2002.Google Scholar
  31. Ramsar Convention Secretariat. Water purification wetland ecosystem services: factsheet 5. Gland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat; 2010.Google Scholar
  32. Revenga C, Brunner J, Henninger N, Kassem K, Payne R. Pilot analysis of global ecosystems: freshwater systems. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute; 2000.Google Scholar
  33. Revenga C, Kura Y. Status and trends of inland water biodiversity. CBD Technical Papers Series No. 11. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity; 2003.Google Scholar
  34. Richter BD, Postel S, Revenga C, Scudder T, Lehner B, Churchill A, Chow M. Lost in development’s shadow: the downstream human consequences of dams. Water Altern. 2010;3(2):14–42.Google Scholar
  35. Smith KG, Barrios V, Darwall WRT, Numa C, editors. The status and distribution of freshwater biodiversity in the Eastern mediterranean. Cambridge, UK, Malaga/Gland: IUCN; 2014.Google Scholar
  36. Sverdrup-Jensen S. Fisheries in the Lower Mekong Basin: status and perspective. MRC Technical Paper No.6. Phnom Penh: Mekong River Commission; 2002.Google Scholar
  37. TFDD (Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database). Department of Geosciences at Oregon State University. 2012.
  38. Turtle Conservation Coalition. Rhodin AGJ, Walde AD, Horne BD, van Dijk PP, Blanck T, Hudson R, editors. Turtles in trouble: the world’s 25+ most endangered tortoises and freshwater turtles – 2011. Lunenburg: IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group, Turtle Conservation Fund, Turtle Survival Alliance, Turtle Conservancy, Chelonian Research Foundation, Conservation International, Wildlife Conservation Society, and San Diego Zoo Global; 2011.Google Scholar
  39. WHO, UNICEF. World Health Organization and UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP). Progress on drinking water and sanitation, 2015 update and MDG assessment. 2015.
  40. UNEP. Blue harvest: inland fisheries as an ecosystem service. Penang: WorldFish Center; 2010.Google Scholar
  41. UN Water. World Water Day 2009 FAQs. 2009. Available from: Accessed 16 Mar 2016.
  42. USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). HYDRO1k elevation derivative database. Sioux Falls: USGS EROS Data Center; 2000.Google Scholar
  43. Vorosmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, Green P, Glidden S, Bunn SE, Sullivan CA, Reidy Liermann C, Davies PM. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature. 2010;467:555–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Welcomme RL. International introductions of inland aquatic species. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Technical Series Paper 294. Rome: FAO; 1988.Google Scholar
  45. Williamson L, McCormick N. Energy, ecosystems and livelihoods: understanding linkages in the face of climate change impacts. Gland: IUCN; 2008.Google Scholar
  46. Witte F, Goldschmidt T, Wanink J, van Oijen M, Goudswaard K, Witte-Mass E, Bouton N. The destruction of an endemic species flock: quantitative data on the decline of the haplochromine cichlids of Lake Victoria. Enviorn Biol Fish. 1992;34:1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. WWAP (World Water Assessment Program). The United Nations world water development report 3: water in a changing world. Paris/London: UNESCO/Earthscan; 2009.Google Scholar
  48. WWF. Increasing protection of river catchments. Factsheet. Washington, DC: World Wildlife Fund; 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Nature ConservancyArlingtonUSA
  2. 2.TenteraMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations