The Wetland Book pp 1039-1055 | Cite as

Blanket Mires of Caithness and Sutherland: Scotland’s Great Flow Country (UK)

Reference work entry

Abstract

The Flow Country of northern Scotland dominates the northernmost part of mainland Britain. It is thought to be one of, if not the, largest more-or-less continuous expanses of blanket mire in the world. It extends from the coast of Caithness in the east to the foot of the mountain chain which dominates western parts of Sutherland, covering some 400,000 ha in all. The mire systems of the Flow Country occur in a wide variety of forms as well as displaying distinct east-west gradients in their vegetation and surface microtopography. These mires also support internationally important breeding bird populations, including many species more usually associated with the northern tundra. The area has a long history of human occupation and land use but the treeless peat-dominated landscape, which developed around 6200 BP, remained largely unchanged until after World War 2 when some experimental conifer plantations were established on the deep peat. These were then followed in the 1980s by a huge expansion of conifer plantation across the peatlands, leading to a major battle between conservation bodies and the forest industry. The afforestation was eventually halted but only after some 70,000 ha had been planted or was scheduled for planting. Substantial efforts are now being devoted to restoring these plantations to open bog. Meanwhile windfarm developments pose a new threat. Despite these challenges, the area is under consideration for possible World Heritage status.

Keywords

Blanket Bog Britain Caithness Conifer Flow Forestry Forsinard Mire NCC Peat Plantations Pools RSPB Scotland Sutherland Tundra Windfarm 

References

  1. Andersen R, Payne R, Ratcliffe J, Gaffney P. Restoration of afforested peatlands in Scotland. Proceedings from In the Bog: the ecology, landscape, archaeology and heritage of Peatlands, 3–4th Sept, Sheffield; 2014.Google Scholar
  2. Bainbridge IP, Minns DW, Housden SD, Lance AN. Forestry in the flows of Caithness and Sutherland, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds Conservation topic paper 18. Sandy: RSPB; 1987.Google Scholar
  3. Birse EL. Assessment of climatic conditions in Scotland. 3. The bioclimatic sub-regions, Soil survey of Scotland bulletin no. 4. Aberdeen: Macaulay Institute for Soil Research; 1971.Google Scholar
  4. Chapman S, Artz R, Donnelly D. Carbon savings from peat restoration. ClimateXChange enquiry, 1205–02, 1–17. 2012Google Scholar
  5. Charman DJ. Blanket mire formation at the Cross Lochs, Sutherland, northern Scotland. Boreas. 1992;21:53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Douglas DJ, Bellamy PE, Pearce‐Higgins JW. Changes in the abundance and distribution of upland breeding birds at an operational wind farm. Bird Study. 2011;58:37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilbert L. Can restoration of afforested peatland regulate pests and disease? J Appl Ecol. 2013;50:1226–33.Google Scholar
  8. Goodyear, E. Quantifying the Desmid diversity of Scottish Blanket Mires. Doctoral dissertation, University of the Highlands and Islands, Scotland. 2014.Google Scholar
  9. Lindsay RA, Charman DJ, Everingham F, O’Reilly RM, Palmer MA, Rowell TA, Stroud DA. The flow country: the peatlands of Caithness and Sutherland. Peterborough: Nature Conservancy Council; 1988.Google Scholar
  10. Lindsay R. A letter to Derek Ratcliffe. In: Thompson D, Birks J, Birks H, editors. Nature’s conscience: the life and legacy of Derek Ratcliffe (wildlife and people). Peterborough: Langford Press; 2015.Google Scholar
  11. Muller FL, Tankéré-Muller SP. Seasonal variations in surface water chemistry at disturbed and pristine peatland sites in the Flow Country of northern Scotland. Sci Total Environ. 2012;435:351–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pearce‐Higgins JW, Stephen L, Douse A, Langston RH. Greater impacts of wind farms on bird populations during construction than subsequent operation: results of a multi‐site and multi‐species analysis. J Appl Ecol. 2012;49:386–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pearsall WH. Two blanket-bogs in Sutherland. J Ecol. 1956;44(2):493–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Prebble J. The Highland clearances. London: Secker and Warburg; 1963.Google Scholar
  15. Ratcliffe DA. Mires and bogs. In: Burnett JH, editor. Vegetation of Scotland. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd; 1964. p. 426–78.Google Scholar
  16. Ratcliffe DA. In search of nature. Leeds: Peregrine Books; 2000.Google Scholar
  17. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB). Forestry in the flow country – the threat to birds. Sandy: RSPB; 1985.Google Scholar
  18. Stroud DA, Reed TM, Pienkowski MW, Lindsay RA. Birds, bogs and forestry: the peatlands of Caithness and Sutherland. Peterborough: Nature Conservancy Council; 1987.Google Scholar
  19. Stroud D, Reed T, Pienkowski M, Lindsay R. E. The flow country: battles fought, war won, organisation lost. In: Thompson D, Birks J, Birks H, editors. Nature’s conscience: the life and legacy of Derek Ratcliffe (wildlife and people). Peterborough: Langford Press; 2015.Google Scholar
  20. Tansley AG. The British islands and their vegetation. Cambridge: The University Press; 1939.Google Scholar
  21. Vinjili S. Landuse change and organic carbon exports from a peat catchment of the Halladale River in the Flow Country of Sutherland and Caithness, Scotland. Doctoral dissertation, University of St Andrews, Scotland. 2012.Google Scholar
  22. Wilson JD, Anderson R, Bailey S, Chetcuti J, Cowie NR, Hancock MH, Quine CP, Russell N, Leigh S, Thompson D. Modelling edge effects of mature forest plantations on peatland waders informs landscape‐scale conservation. J Appl Ecol. 2014;51:204–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sustainability Research InstituteUniversity of East LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Environmental Research InstituteUniversity of the Highlands and IslandsThursoUK

Personalised recommendations