Arctic Peatlands

Reference work entry

Abstract

Arctic peatlands are mire ecosystems distributed across the vast northern edges of the Eurasian and North American continents and the islands and coastal areas of the Arctic and far northern Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. Arctic peatlands are mostly represented by “frozen” mires with much of their organic deposits remaining frozen throughout the year, whose water regime and other characteristics are strongly dependent on permafrost.

Primary production in arctic peatlands is low, but the tendency for peat to accumulate is enhanced by the low decomposition rates. The peat layer in arctic peatlands is not thick, and only in rare cases does the peat exceed 4–6 m in depth. Three main permafrost processes are responsible for the variability of arctic frozen peatlands: thermokarst, frost heaving, and cracking. Arctic peatland diversity and distribution across the landscape depends on the climate conditions, permafrost presence, and hydrology-connected landscape dynamics, and adheres to a characteristic pattern which is beneficial to consider in inventory, mapping, or planning of wetland management.

The ecosystem diversity of arctic peatlands is presented by paludified shallow peatlands; “frozen” peatland types such as polygon mires, peat plateaus, and palsa mires; and “nonfrozen” peatland types like patterned string fens, raised bogs, riparian mires, coastal tundra, and some types of coastal marsh.

Arctic ecosystems are characterized by low species diversity, and typical species are highly specialized and intimately linked to their habitats. The short growing season limits annual production and the ecological niche capacity of these species.

Arctic peatlands are highly integrated ecosystems which are extremely fragile to both natural and human-induced perturbations.

With climate change, the arctic region will continue to warm more rapidly than the global mean. Peat, as a thermo-isolating material, plays a crucial role in minimizing permafrost thaw. However, climate change-induced peatland degradation introduces positive feedback with permafrost thaw. Accompanying rapid in situ peat decomposition is an increase in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, specifically methane from saturated peat water and that which was formerly bound in frozen permafrost.

Development in such areas often ignores the special hydrological and ecological characteristics that are central to the productivity of these areas. Increased development of the oil and gas industry and its supporting transport infrastructure significantly fragments the landscape and disrupts its hydrology. Even traditional land uses such as reindeer herding are being industrialized. The resulting changes in peatland status will in turn restrict use of the land by the indigenous people who have traditionally depended on peatlands for food including herded reindeer, game, and fish.

Thus, there is an urgent need to promote sustainable practices.

Keywords

Climate change Palsa mires Peat plateau Permafrost Polygon mires Positive feedback Shallow peatlands Thermokarst Thermo-isolation resistance 

References

  1. AMAP. Snow, water, ice and permafrost in the Arctic (SWIPA): climate change and the cryosphere. Oslo: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP); 2011.Google Scholar
  2. Andreev AA, Klimanov VA, Sulerzhitsky LD. Vegetation and climate history of the Yana River lowland, Russia, during the last 6400 yr. Quat Sci Rev. 2001;20:259–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Botch MS, Masing VV. Mire ecosystems of the USSR. Leningrad: Nauka; 1979.Google Scholar
  4. CAFF. Arctic flora and fauna: status and conservation. Helsinki: Edita; 2002.Google Scholar
  5. CAFF. Arctic Biodiversity Assessment. Statistics and trends in Arctic biodiversity: synthesis. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna, Arctic Council. Iceland: Akureyri; 2013. 128 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Fronzek S, Luoto M, Carter TR. Potential effect of climate change on the distribution of palsa mires in subarctic Fennoscandia. Climate Res. 2006;32:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hofgaard A. NINA Project Report 21: effects of climate change on the distribution and development of palsa peatlands: background and suggestions for a national monitoring project. Trondheim: Norwegian Institute for Nature Research; 2003.Google Scholar
  8. IPCC. Climate change 2014 synthesis report. 2014. https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/SYR_AR5_LONGERREPORT.pdf. Last visited 1 Mar 2015.
  9. Joosten H, Clarke D. Wise use of mires and peatlands – background and principles including a framework for decision-making. Devon: International Mire Conservation Group and International Peat Society, NHBS Ltd.; 2002.Google Scholar
  10. Kats NY. Bolota Zyemnogo Shara [The Mires of the Globe] Moscow: Nauka; 1971. 295 p. [In Russian]Google Scholar
  11. Kershaw GP. Permafrost landform degradation over more than half a century, Macmillan Pass/Caribou Pass region, NWT/Yukon, Canada. In: Phillips M, Springman SM, Arenson LU, editors. Proceedings of the eighth international conference on permafrost. Zurich: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers; 2003. p. 543–8.Google Scholar
  12. Konstantinova GS. On the cryogenic formations in the region of Bolshoy Khantay rift. In: Efimov AI, editor. The permafrost deposits in the different regions of USSR. Moscow: Academy of Sciences USSR; 1963. p. 112–20 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  13. Kujala K, Seppälä M, Holappa T. Physical properties of peat and palsa formation. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 2008;52:408–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Laitinen J, Sakari R, Antti H, Teemu T, Raimo H, Tapio L. Mire systems in Finland – special view to aapa mires and their water-flow pattern. Suo. 2007;58(1):1–26.Google Scholar
  15. Mackay JR. Thermally induced movements in ice wedge polygons, western Arctic coast: a long term study. Géogr Phys Quat. 2000;54:41–68.Google Scholar
  16. Minayeva T, Sirin A. Wetlands – threatened Arctic ecosystems: vulnerability to climate change and adaptation options. In: UNESCO, editor. Climate change and Arctic sustainable development: scientific, social, cultural and educational challenges. Paris: UNESCO; 2009. p. 80–7.Google Scholar
  17. Minayeva T, Sirin A. Arctic peatlands. In: Arctic biodiversity trends 2010 – selected indicators of change. Akureyri: CAFF International Secretariat; 2010. p. 71–4. http://www.arcticbiodiversity.is/images/stories/report/pdf/Arctic_Biodiversity_Trends_Report_2010.pdf
  18. Novikov SM, Usova LI, Moskvin YuP, editors. Hydrology of wetlands of the permafrost zone in West Siberia. St. Petersburg: VVM; 2009 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  19. Payette S, Delwaide A, Caccianiga M, Beauchemin M. Accelerated thawing of subarctic peatland permafrost over the last 50 years. Geophys Res Lett. 2004;31:L18208. doi:10.1029/2004GL020358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Peteet D, Andreev A, Bardeen W, Mistretta F. Long-term Arctic peatland dynamics, vegetation and climate history of the Pur-Taz region, Western Siberia. Boreas. 1998;27:575–86.Google Scholar
  21. Pitkanen A, Turunen J, Tahvanainen T, Tolonen K. Holocene vegetation history from the Salym-Yugan Mire Area, West Siberia. Holocene. 2002;12:353–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pyavchenko NI. Bugristyje torfyaniki (Palsa mires). Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the USSR Publishing House; 1955 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  23. Ramsar Convention Secretariat. Designating Ramsar sites: strategic framework and guidelines for the future development of the list of Wetlands of International Importance, Ramsar handbooks for the wise use of wetlands, vol. 17. 4th ed. Gland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat; 2010.Google Scholar
  24. Seppälä M. The origin of palsas. Geogr Ann. 1986;A68:141–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tarnocai C, Zoltai SC. Wetlands of Arctic Canada. In: National Wetlands Working Group, editor. Wetlands of Canada, Ecological classification series, no. 24. Ottawa: Enironment Canada and Polyscience Publications; 1988. p. 29–53.Google Scholar
  26. Tyuremnov SN. Peat deposits. Moscow: Nedra; 1976 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  27. Vasilchuk YuK, Petrova EA, Serova AK. Some features of the Yamal paleogeography in Holocene. Bull Comm Quat Stud. 1983;52:73–89 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  28. Vasilchuk YuK, Vasilchuk AK, Budantseva NA, Chizhova JN. Palsa of frozen peat mires. Moscow: Moscow University Press; 2008. p. 571.Google Scholar
  29. Vompersky SE, Sirin A, Tsyganova OP, Valyaeva NA, Maikov DA. Peatland and paludified lands of Russia: attempt at analysis of spatial distribution and diversity. Izv RAS Geogr. 2005;5:39–50.Google Scholar
  30. Zhang T, Barry RG, Knowles K, Heginbottom JA, Brown J. Statistics and characteristics of permafrost and ground-ice distribution in the Northern Hemisphere. Polar Geogr. 2008;31:47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zoltai SC, Tarnocai C, Mills GF, Veldhuis H. Wetlands of Subarctic Canada. In: National Wetlands Working Group, editor. Wetlands of Canada, Ecological classification series, no. 24. Ottawa: Enironment Canada and Polyscience Publications; 1988. p. 57–96.Google Scholar
  32. Zuidhoff FS. Palsa decay in relation to weather conditions. Geogr Ann. 2002;84:103–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wetlands InternationalEdeThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Center for Protection and Restoration of Peatland Ecosystems, Institute of Forest ScienceRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  3. 3.University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  4. 4.School of the GeographyUniversity of DundeeDundeeUK

Personalised recommendations