Skip to main content

Oracle Bones

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 150 Accesses

The practice of burning animal bones for divination in China reaches back to the fourth millennium BCE. It attained increasing levels of sophistication in the preparation and variety of animal bones used under the Shang, beginning in the sixteenth century BCE (Venture 2009). This entry will concentrate on inscribed Shang oracle bones, which date to the late Shang period. A conservative estimate of oracle bone inscriptions places their production to around 1200–1045 BCE (Keightley 1978). They are considered to be the earliest available evidence of the first systematic form of writing in China. Indeed, Shang characters are direct predecessors of some modern Chinese characters (Boltz 1994). Philologists and sinologists have done much to interpret and translate these oracle bones, a significant number of which had been unearthed in the late Shang capital of Anyang, in Henan province (Academia Sinica 2010a; UNESCO World Heritage Centre, n.d; Yin Xu 2007). Although interpretative work with...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Academia Sinica. (2010a). Oracle bone inscriptions and the world memory. Retrieved from http://oraclememory.ihp.sinica.edu.tw/e-video.htm

  • Academia Sinica. (2010b). The oracle bone collections. Retrieved from http://oraclememory.ihp.sinica.edu.tw/e-collection.htm

  • Aristotle. (1984a). On the soul. In J. Barnes (Ed.), Complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation (Vol. 1, pp. 641–692). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1984b). Poetics. In J. Barnes (Ed.), Complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation (Vol. 2, pp. 2316–2340). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltz, W. G. (1994). The origin and early development of the Chinese writing system. New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, B. (2009). On the origin of stories: Evolution, cognition, and fiction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1979). Causality and modern science (3rd ed.). New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, K.-C. (1980). Shang civilization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero. (1923). De divinatione (W. A. Falconer, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanhoe, P. J. (Ed.). (1996). Chinese language, thought, and culture. Chicago/La Salle IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keightley, D. N. (1978). Sources of Shang history: The oracle-bone inscriptions of bronze age China. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keightley, D. N. (2000). The ancestral landscape: Time, space, and community in late Shang China (ca. 1200–1045 B.C.). Berkeley, CA: Center for Chinese Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keightley, D. N. (2001). The “science” of ancestors: Divination, curing, and bronze-casting in late Shang China. Asia Minor, 14(2), 147–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keightley, D. N. (2006). Marks and labels: Early writing in neolithic and Shang China. In M. T. Stark (Ed.), Archaeology of Asia (pp. 177–201). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Serruys, P. L.-M. (1974). Studies in the language of the Shang Oracle inscriptions. T’oung Pao, 60(1–2), 12–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO World Heritage Centre. (n.d.). Yin Xu. Retrieved from http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1114

  • Venture, O. (2009). La pyro-ostéomancie sous les Shang et les Zhou occidentaux: Formation et évolution d’une pratique rituelle royale. In J. Lagerwey (Ed.), Religion et société en Chine ancienne et médiévale (pp. 77–100). Paris: Cerf/Institut Ricci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicas, A. (2010). Repetition in Shang Oracle bone inscriptions as narrative. International Journal of the Humanities, 8(11), 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicas, A. (2011). Shāng dynasty Oracle Bone agency: Its contemporary philosophical significance. In K. Tchou (Ed.), China and the humanities: At the crossroads of the human and the humane (pp. 63–76). Champaign, IL: Common Ground Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin Xu. (2007). Beijing: New World Press and China Translation & Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Astrid Vicas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Vicas, A. (2014). Oracle Bones. In: Selin, H. (eds) Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3934-5_9991-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3934-5_9991-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-3934-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics