City Planning in Cambodia

  • Martin Stuart-Fox
  • Paul Reeve
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3934-5_9864-2

City planning in Cambodia has gone through four phases: (i) 800–1431 when Angkor was the capital of the Khmer empire, (ii) fifteenth to nineteenth century, (iii) during French colonial rule (1863–1953), and (iv) since independence.

City Planning at Angkor

The key concept that informed early Khmer city planning was the cosmological belief that symbolic correspondences existed between the divine macrocosm of the Hindu gods and the mundane microcosm. The Khmer believed that the flow of power from the former to the latter could be ensured by giving these correspondences material expression in the configuration of centers of power.

In Hindu cosmology, the gods live in a divine city atop Mount Meru, the axis of the world, presided over by Indra, king of the gods (Mabbett, 1983). The mountain is surrounded by annular seas beyond which are the continents of different shapes located in the four directions, the southern one being the triangle of India. The Khmer king was believed to be the...

Keywords

Mekong Delta City Planning Colonial Government Khmer Rouge Royal Palace 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Atelier Parisien d’Urbanisme. (1997). Phnom Penh: Développement Urbain et Patrimoine. Paris: Ministère de la Culture.Google Scholar
  2. Chandler, D. P. (1993). A history of Cambodia (2nd ed.). St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  3. Coe, M. (2003). Angkor and the Khmer civilization. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  4. Coedès, G. (1913). Études cambodgiennes VIII: La fondation de Phnom Peñ au XVe siècle d’après la chronique cambodgienne. Bulletin de l’École Français d’Extrême-Orient, 13(6), 6–11.Google Scholar
  5. Goulin, C. (1966). Phnom Penh: Étude de Géographie Urbaine, Thèse de doctorat de 3ème cycle de géographie, Phnom Penh.Google Scholar
  6. Grant-Ross, H., & Collins, D. L. (2006). Building Cambodia: ‘New Khmer architecture’ 1953–1970. Bangkok: The Key Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Igout, M. (1993). Phnom Penh: Then and now. Bangkok: White Lotus.Google Scholar
  8. Jacques, C., & Freeman, M. (1997). Angkor: Cities and temples. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
  9. Lamant, P. -L. (1991). La création d’une capitale par le pouvoir colonial. In P. B. Lafont (Ed.), Péninsule Indochinoise Études Urbaines (pp. 59–102). Paris: l’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  10. Mabbett, I. W. (1983). The symbolism of Mount Meru. History of Religions, 23, 64–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Molyvann, V. (2003). Modern Khmer cities. Phnom Penh: Reyum Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Muller, G. (2006). Colonial Cambodia’s ‘Bad Frenchmen’: The rise of French rule and the life of Thomas Caraman, 1840–87. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Osborne, M. (1994). Sihanouk: Prince of light, prince of darkness. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.Google Scholar
  14. Osborne, M. (2008). Phnom Penh: A cultural and literary history. Oxford: Signal Books.Google Scholar
  15. Sharrock, P. (2007). The mystery of the face towers. In C. Joyce (Ed.), Bayon: New perspectives. Bangkok: River Books.Google Scholar
  16. Stuart-Fox, M., & Reeve, P. (2011). Symbolism in city planning in Cambodia from Angkor to Phnom Penh. Journal of the Siam Society, 99, 105–138.Google Scholar
  17. Tambiah, S. J. (1976). World conqueror and world renouncer: A study of Buddhism and polity in Thailand against a historical background. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.BrisbaneAustralia