Number Theory in India

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3934-5_9278-2

It is difficult to find “number theory” in its proper sense in Indian mathematics. What I am going to describe below is how the Indians have treated kinds of numbers.

In the Vedas (ca. 1200–800 BCE), the oldest Hindu literature, a number of numerical expressions occur. Their favorite numbers were three and seven as well as a hundred and a thousand. The largest number contained in their common list of names for powers of ten is 1012 (called parārdha). Later (by the fourth century AD), those names came to be employed for denoting decimal places and became the nucleus of the Hindu list of decimal names (18 in number), while the Buddhists and the Jainas developed longer lists, which contained numbers as large as 1053 (tallakṣaṇa) or more.

The Jainas even speculated about different kinds of uncountable and infinite numbers ( Aṇuogaddārāiṃ, between the third and the fifth centuries AD). They divided the whole set of “numbers ( saṃkhyā) concerning counting ( gaṇanā)” into three subsets – (1)...

Keywords

Arithmetical Operation Irrational Number Seventh Century White Mustard Favorite Number 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Bag, A. K., & Sarma, S. R. (Eds.). (2003). The concept of śūnya. New Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts, etc.Google Scholar
  2. Bäumer, B. (Ed.). (1992). Kalātattvakośa: a lexicon of fundamental concepts of the Indian arts. Vol. 2: concept of space and time (pp. 399–428). New Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts/Motilal Banarsidass (on śūnya by S. R. Sarma).Google Scholar
  3. Bavare, B., & Divakaran, P. P. (2013). Genesis and early evolution of decimal enumeration: evidence from number names in Ṛgveda. Indian Journal of History of Science, 48, 535–581.Google Scholar
  4. Chemla, K., & Keller, A. (2002). The Sanskrit karaṇī and the Chinese mian. In Y. Dold-Samplonius (Ed.), From China to Paris: 2000 years transmission of mathematical ideas (pp. 87–132). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
  5. Datta, B. (1926/31). Early literary evidences of the use of the zero in India. American Mathematical Monthly, 33 (1926), 449–454 and 38 (1931): 566–572.Google Scholar
  6. Datta, B. (1929). The Jaina school of mathematics. Bulletin of the Calcutta Mathematical Society, 21, 115–145.Google Scholar
  7. Datta, B. (1932). The science of the Śulba. Calcutta: University of Calcutta.Google Scholar
  8. Datta, B. (1937). Vedic mathematics. In The cultural heritage of India (Vol. 3, pp. 378–401). Calcutta: Ramakrishna Centenary Committee.Google Scholar
  9. Divakaran, P. P. (2010). Notes on Yuktibhāṣā: Recursive methods in Indian mathematics. In C. S. Seshadri (Ed.), Studies in the history of Indian mathematics (pp. 287–351). New Delhi: Hindustan Book Agency.Google Scholar
  10. Folkerts, M. (2001). Early texts on Hindu-Arabic calculation. Science in Context, 14, 13–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ganitanand. (2003). The stumbling hole: A brief history of division by zero. Gaṇta Bhāratī, 25, 138–145.Google Scholar
  12. Gupta, R. C. (2001). World’s longest lists of decuple terms. Gaṇita Bhāratī, 23, 83–90.Google Scholar
  13. Hanaki, T. (1920). Aṇuogaddārāim: English translation. Vaishali: Research Institute of Prakrit, Jainology & Ahiṃsa.Google Scholar
  14. Hayashi, T., Kusuba, T., & Yano, M. (1990). The correction of the Mādhava series for the circumference of a circle. Centaurus, 33, 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayashi, T. (2012). A hitherto unknown commentary on the Bījagaṇitādhyāya of Jñānarāja. Souvenir of the International Seminar on History of Mathematics at Ramjas College, University of Delhi, 19–20 Nov 2012, 51–53.Google Scholar
  16. Hayashi, T. (Ed. & Trans.). (2013). Gaṇitamañjarī of Gaṇeśa. New Delhi: Indian National Science Academy.Google Scholar
  17. Hopkins, E. W. (1894). Numerical formulae in the Veda and their bearing on Vedic criticism. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 16, 275–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jadhav, D. (2009). On the figurative numbers from the Bhagavatīsūtra. Gaṇita Bhāratī, 32, 35–55.Google Scholar
  19. Keller, A. (2006). Expounding the mathematical seed: A translation of Bhāskara I on the mathematical chapter of the Āryabhaṭīya. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  20. Kusuba, T. (2004). Indian rules for decomposition of fractions. In C. Burnett et al. (Eds.), Studies in the history of the exact sciences in honour of David Pingree (pp. 497–516). Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  21. Michaels, A. (1978). Beweisverfahren in der vedischen Sakralgeometrie. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
  22. Pettersson, J. S. (1999). Indus numerals on metal tools. Indian Journal of History of Science, 34, 89–108.Google Scholar
  23. Rajagopal, C. T., & Rangachari, M. S. (1978). On an untapped source of medieval Keralese mathematics. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 18, 89–102.Google Scholar
  24. Sarma, K. V., Ramasubramanian, K., Srinivas, M. D., & Sriram, M. S. (2008). Gaṇitayuktibhāṣā (Rationales in Mathematical Astronomy) of Jyeṣṭadeva. (Vol. I). Mathematics. (Vol. II). Astronomy. New Delhi: Hindustan Book Agency.Google Scholar
  25. Shah, R. S. (2007). Mathematics of Anuyogadwara-Sutra. Gaṇita Bhāratī, 29, 81–100.Google Scholar
  26. Shah, R. S. (2008). Mathematical ideas in Bhagavatī-Sūtra (BS). Gaṇita Bhāratī, 30, 1–25.Google Scholar
  27. Shukla, K. S. (1966). Hindu methods for finding factors or divisors of a number. Gaṇita, 17, 109–117.Google Scholar
  28. Srinivas, M. D. (2005). Proofs in Indian mathematics. In G. G. Emch, R. Sridharan, & M. D. Srinivas (Eds.), Contributions to the history of Indian mathematics (pp. 209–248). New Delhi: Hindustan Book Agency.Google Scholar
  29. Staal, F. (2010). On the origin of zero. In C. S. Seshadri (Ed.), Studies in the history of Indian mathematics (pp. 39–53). New Delhi: Hindustan Book Agency.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Doshisha UniversityKyoto CityJapan