Weights and Measures in Mesoamerica

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3934-5_8936-2

Indian Measures

In Latin America, the Indian populations measured and counted the goods, lands, merchandise, and the days and months according to scientist systems that historiography began to decrypt. After the Spanish conquest, the conquerors imported the weights and measures of their country, the Castille, which, itself, had borrowed a good part from the Arab-Berber occupants (Villena). In Mesoamerica, in Mexico in particular, the result was a new syncretism which merged the different systems. The Indians adopted the measures of the conquerors who did not hesitate to attribute Indian names to the new measures.

“Los aztecas tenian una fuerte tendencia a medir y contar” [The Aztecs had a strong tendency to measure and count] (Harvey and Williams). The arithmetic system was based on three major numbers: 20, 400, and 8,000. The number 20 is called “a count” (cempoalli in Náhuatl language), 202 = 400 or “a head of hair” (cen-tzontl), and 203 = 8,000 “a bag” (cen-xiquipilli). The system...

Keywords

Spanish Conquest Familiar Territory Arithmetic System Spanish Author Land Measure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Alonso, M. M. (1984). Medidas Indigenas de Longitud. Mexico: CIESAS.Google Scholar
  2. Castillo Ferreras, V. (1972). Unidades náhuas de medida. Estudios de Cultura Náhuatl, 10, 195–223.Google Scholar
  3. Ewald, U. (1985). The Mexican salt industry, 1560–1980. A study in change. Stuttgart: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
  4. Garcia Acosta, V. (1988). Los Precios del Trigo en la Historia Colonial de Mexico. México: CIESAS.Google Scholar
  5. Gual Camarena, M. (1981). El Primer Manual Hispanico de Mercaderia (Siglo XIV). Barcelona: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas.Google Scholar
  6. Guerra, F. (1960). Weights and measures in pre-Columbian America. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, xv, 342–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harvey, H. R., & Williams, B. J. (1981). La aritmética azteca : notación posicional y cálculo de área. Ciencia y Desarollo (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología), año vii, pp. 22–33.Google Scholar
  8. Hocquet J-C. (1992), Anciens systèmes de poids et mesures en Occident, Variorum Reprints, Londres.Google Scholar
  9. Hocquet, J-C. (1995). La métrologie historique (coll. Que sais-je ? n° 2972), Paris.Google Scholar
  10. Matías Alonso, M. (1984). Medidas indigenas de longitud. México: CIESAS.Google Scholar
  11. O’Brien, P. J., & Christiansen, H. D. (1986). An ancient maya measurement system. American Antiquity, 51, 136–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ralph, R. (1957). The political geography of the Yucatan Maya. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.Google Scholar
  13. Robelo Cecilio, A. (1997). Diccionario de pesas y medidas mexicanas, antiguas y modernas y de su conversion. Para uso de los comerciantes y de las familias. México: CIESAS (1e éd. 1908).Google Scholar
  14. Royas Rabiela Teresa. (2011). Como median e contaban los antiguos mexicanos? In Vera Héctor et García Acosta Virginia (Eds.), Metros, Leguas y Mecates. Historia de los sistemas de mediciòn en México (pp. 31–48). México: CIESAS.Google Scholar
  15. Roys, R. (1957). The Political Geography of the Yucatan Maya. Washington DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.Google Scholar
  16. Vera, H. (2011). Bibliografía sobre la historia de las medidas en México, In Vera Héctor et GarcÚa Acosta Virginia eds., Metros, Leguas y Mecates. Historia de los sistemas de mediciòn en México, ciesas, México, pp. 259–271.Google Scholar
  17. Villena, L. Weights and measures in Islamic Spain. Acta Metrologiae Historicae I-(Comité International de MÕtrologie Historique), Linz 1985, pp. 298–303.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversity of LilleLilleFrance