For an extended version of this article, see Jonardon Ganeri, “Well-Ordered Science and Indian Epistemic Cultures,” Isis 2013, 104: 348–359. Springer thanks the University of Chicago Press for permission to reproduce this abridgement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Balcerowicz, P. (2001). The logical structure of the naya method of the Jainas. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 29(3), 379–403.
Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cohen, H. F. (2011). How modern science came into the world: Four civilizations, one 17th-century breakthrough. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000). Multiple modernities. Daedalus, 129(1), 1–29.
Freidman, S. (2001). Definitional excursions: The meanings of modern/modernity/modernism. Modernism/Modernity, 8(3), 493–513.
Freidman, S. (2006). Periodizing modernism: Postcolonial modernities and the space/time borders of modernist studies. Modernism/Modernity, 13(3), 425–443. 429.
Ganeri, J. (2001a). Philosophy in classical India: The proper work of reason (pp. 134–137). London: Routledge.
Ganeri, J. (2001b). Argumentation, dialogue and the Kathāvatthu. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 29(4), 485–493.
Ganeri, J. (2002). Jaina logic and the philosophical basis of pluralism. History and Philosophy of Logic, 23, 267–281.
Kathāvatthu [Elements of Dialogue], ed. Arnold C. Taylor. Pali Text Society, text series nos. 48, 49. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Vol. I, first published 1894, Vol. II, first published 1897); trans. S.Z. Aung and C.A.F. Rhys Davids, Points of Controversy, or, Subjects of Discourse: Being a Translation of the Kathāvatthu from the Abhidhammapiṭaka. Pali Text Society, translation series no.5. (London: Luzac & Co. Reprint 1960).
Kitcher, P. (2001). Science, truth, and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kitcher, P. (2011). Science in a democratic society. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Malliṣeṇa, Syādvādamañjarī of Malliṣeṇa with the Anyayoga-vyavaccheda-dvātriṃśikā of Hemacandra, ed. A. B. Dhruva (Bombay Sanskrit and Prakrit Series No. 83, Bombay, 1933), 167.9–18; trans. Balcerowicz, P. (2001). The logical structure of the naya method of the Jainas. Journal of Indian Philosophy 29.3, 379–403, 395.
Needham, J. (1969). The grand titration: Science and society in East and West. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
Priest, G. (2008). Jaina logic: A contemporary perspective. History and Philosophy of Logic, 29(3), 263–278.
Radhakrishnan, R. (2002). Derivative discourses and the problem of signification. The European Legacy, 7(6), 783–795.
Subrahmanyam, S. (1998). Hearing voices: Vignettes of early modernity in South Asia, 1400–1750. Daedalus, 127(3), 75–104.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ganeri, J. (2013). Polycentered History of Science. In: Selin, H. (eds) Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3934-5_10008-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3934-5_10008-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-3934-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities