Global Bioethics

Reference work entry

Abstract

In this chapter two popular accounts of bioethics will be reviewed, viz. “the story of exportation” and “the story of invention.” According to these accounts, global ethics, as based on a set of universal values or principles, is either seen as imperialist and neocolonialist and thus undesirable, or as futile. As will be argued, both accounts are rejected and an alternative account will be presented, which involves a more favorable and optimistic view of global bioethics. Against the backdrop of Potter’s original conception of global bioethics and along the lines of Kymlicka’s conception of global ethics, global bioethics will be conceived as a two-level phenomenon. On an abstract level, there is a set of minimum standards, on which different traditions and cultures agree. These universal standards are expressed in international human rights language and elaborated into specific bioethics principles. On another more contextualized level, there are efforts to articulate more specific bioethics standards in the context of specific religious and cultural traditions. In addition, local specifics of cultures and traditions are important for the interpretation and application of universal standards. The two levels interact along bottom up and top down lines of communication. Hence, global bioethics is seen as the result of a global process of constructive dialogues and negotiations. It is an exponent of a more general dialectical process of globalization.

Keywords

Global Community Medical Tourism Moral Community Benefit Sharing Moral Framework 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Agius, E. (2005). Environmental ethics: Towards an intergenerational perspective. In H. A. M. J. Ten Have (Ed.), Environmental ethics and international policy (pp. 89–115). Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  2. Burawoy, M. (2001). Manufacturing the global. Ethnography, 2(2), 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Callahan, D. (1973). Bioethics as a discipline. The Hastings Center Studies, 1(1), 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chattopadhyay, S. (2011). Facing up the hard problems: Western bioethics in the eastern land of India. In C. Myser (Ed.), Bioethics around the globe (pp. 19–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. De Vries, R., & Rott, L. (2011). Bioethics as missionary work: The export of western ethics to developing countries. In C. Myser (Ed.), Bioethics around the globe (pp. 3–18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Goldim, J. (2009). Revisiting the beginning of bioethics. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 52(3), 277–380.Google Scholar
  7. Jonsen, A. R. (1998). The birth of bioethics. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kearney, M. (1995). The local and the global: The anthropology of globalization and transnationalism. Annual Reviews of Anthropology, 24, 547–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kirby, P. (2006). Vulnerability and violence. The impact of globalization. London/Ann Arbor: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  10. Küng, H. (1997). Weltethos für Weltpolitik und Weltwirtschaft. München: Piper Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. Kymlicka, W. (2007). The globalization of ethics. In W. M. Sullivan & W. Kymlicka (Eds.), The globalization of ethics. Religious and secular perspectives (pp. 1–16). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Myser, C. (2011). Bioethics around the globe. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Potter, V. R. (1968). Teilhard de Chardin and the concept of purpose. Zygon, 3, 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Potter, V. R. (1970). Bioethics, the science of survival. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 14, 127–153.Google Scholar
  15. Potter, V. R. (1971). Bioethics: Bridge to the future. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Potter, V. R. (1975). Humility with responsibility – a bioethic for oncologists: Presidential address. Cancer Research, 35, 2297–2306.Google Scholar
  17. Potter, V. R. (1987). Aldo Leopold’s land ethic revisited: Two kinds of bioethics. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 30(2), 157–169.Google Scholar
  18. Potter, V. R. (1988). Global bioethics – Building on the Leopold legacy. East Lansing (Michigan): Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Reich, W. T. (1994). The word ‘bioethics’: Its birth and the legacies of those who shaped it. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 4(4), 319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reich, W. T. (1995). The word “bioethics”: The struggle over its earliest meanings. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 5(1), 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sass, H.-M. (2008). Fritz Jahr’s 1927 concept of bioethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 17(4), 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre. (2004). The future of man. New York/London/Toronto/Sydney/Auckland: Doubleday (first edition in English 1964; original French version: L'Avenir de l'Homme, 1959).Google Scholar
  24. Ten Have, Henk, A. M. J., & Jean, M. S. (Eds.) (2009). The UNESCO universal declaration on bioethics and human rights: Background, principles, and application. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  25. UNESCO. (1997). Declaration on the Responsibilities of the Present Generations towards Future Generations. Paris: UNESCO. http://www.unesco.org/cpp/uk/declarations/generations.pdf. Accessed December 10, 2011.
  26. Verkerk, M., & Lindemann, H. (2011). Theoretical resources for a globalised bioethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37, 92–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Widdows, H. (2007). Is global ethics moral neo-colonialism? An investigation of the issue in the context of bioethics. Bioethics, 21(6), 305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Health-care EthicsDuquesne UniversityPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Institute of EthicsDublin City UniversityDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations