Advertisement

Scientific Misconduct and Research Integrity

  • David B. Resnik
Reference work entry

Abstract

Ethical integrity is a vital part of good scientific practice and publicly accountable research. This entry presents an overview of research ethics, examining its foundations, principles, common ethical dilemmas, misconduct policies and cases, and international ethics standards.

Keywords

Research Integrity Research Misconduct Good Scientific Practice Singapore Statement Research Integrity Officer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This entry is the work product of an employee or group of employees of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH). The statements, opinions, and conclusions contained in the manuscript do not represent those of NIEHS, NIH, or the US government.

References

  1. Council for International Organizations of Medical Science (CIOMS). (2002). International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Available at: http://www.cioms.ch/publications/layout_guide2002.pdf. Accessed March 29, 2011.
  2. Emanuel, E. J., Grady, C., Crouch, R. A., Lie, R., Miller, F., & Wendler, D. (Eds.). (2008). The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Gert, B. (2007). Common morality (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Kuhn, T. (1977). The essential tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Longino, H. (1990). Science as social knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Macrina, F. (2005). Scientific integrity (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Society of Microbiology Press.Google Scholar
  7. Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435, 737–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Merton, R. (1973). The sociology of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. National Academy of Sciences. (1995). On being a scientist: A guide to responsible conduct in research (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  10. National Academy of Sciences. (2002). Integrity in scientific research: Creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  11. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2005). The ethics of research involving animals. London: Author.Google Scholar
  12. Nuremberg Code. (1947). Directives for human experimentation. Available at: http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html. Accessed March 29, 2011.
  13. Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2000). Federal research misconduct policy. Federal Register, December 6, 2000, 65(235), 76260–76264.Google Scholar
  14. Resnik, D. B. (1998). The ethics of science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Resnik, D. B. (2003). From Baltimore to Bell labs: Reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct. Accountability in Research, 10, 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Resnik, D. B. (2008). Fraud, fabrication, and falsification. In E. J. Emanuel, C. Grady, R. A. Crouch, R. Lie, F. Miller, & D. Wendler (Eds.), Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics (pp. 787–794). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Shamoo, A. S., & Resnik, D. B. (2009). Responsible conduct of research (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shrader-Frechette, K. S. (1994). Ethics of scientific research. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  19. Steneck, N. (2007). ORI introduction to the responsible conduct of research. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  20. Swazey, J., Anderson, M. S., & Louis, K. (1993). Ethical problems in academic research. American Scientist, 181, 542–543.Google Scholar
  21. World Conference on Research Integrity. (2010). Singapore statement. Available at: http://www.singaporestatement.org/statement.html. Accessed March 29, 2011.
  22. World Medical Association. (2008). Declaration of Helsinki. Available at: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html. Accessed March 29, 2011.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BioethicsNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of HealthResearch Triangle ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations