Advertisement

Business Ethics in the School of Salamanca

  • André Azevedo AlvesEmail author
  • José Manuel Moreira

Abstract

The School of Salamanca consisted of a distinct group of Iberian scholastics of the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries that worked mostly within a Thomistic framework and developed it in order to deal with the European expansion into the “New World” and to make sense of the important ethical issues arising from the rapid growth of commercial and financial activity in this period. After briefly reviewing the socioeconomic and cultural context of the School and its intellectual background, this chapter surveys their main contributions for business ethics, namely, on the legitimacy and limits of property rights, the ethical evaluation of commerce, justice in contracts, just price theory, banking and interest, taxation and regulation, and human rights and international law. It is shown that the School of Salamanca provided important contributions for the understanding of the operation of market processes and for business ethics by relying on a realistic natural law framework that emphasizes the ethical, legal, and anthropological foundations of the market economy.

Keywords

Commerce Common good Contracts Justice Just price theory Late Scholasticism Market economy Monopolies School of Salamanca Regulations Taxes Usury Interest Thomism Francisco de Vitoria Domingo de Soto Luis de Molina 

References

  1. 1.
    Azpilcueta M de (2007) Commentary on the resolution of money (the original edition is from 1556). In: Grabill SJ (ed) Sourcebook in late-scholastic monetary theory. Lexington Books, Lanham, pp 18–107Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alves AA, Moreira JM (2010) The Salamanca school. Continuum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Montes JA (1998) La Universidad de Salamanca Bajo Filipe II, 1575–1598. Junta de Castilla y León, BurgosGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Melé D (1999) Early business ethics in Spain: the Salamanca school (1526–1614). J Bus Ethics 22(3):175–189, The citation is from pp 176–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ozment S (1980) The age of reform, 1250–1550: an intellectual and religious history of late medieval and reformation Europe. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 407–409Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chafuen AA (2003) Faith and liberty: the economic thought of the late scholastics. Lexington Books, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Soto D de (1968) De Iustitia et Iure (facsimile of the 1556 Latin edition accompanied with a Spanish translation). Instituto de Estúdios Políticos, MadridGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grice-Hutchinson M (1978) Early economic thought in Spain 1177–1740. George Allen & Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cristóbal de Villalón (1541) Provechoso tratado de câmbios y contrataciones de mercaderes y reprobación de usura. ValladolidGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luís de Alcalá (1543) Tratado de los préstamos. ToledoGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Luís Saravia de la Calle (1544) Instrucción de mercaderes muy provechosa. Medina del CampoGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    González MJ (1999) El contexto genético del pensamento económico en Castilla durante el sigloXVI. Cuadernos de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales 23(37):17–31Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zaratiegui JM (1999) La propiedad en algunos autores de la escuela de Salamanca. Cuadernos de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales 23(37):87–93Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    de Roover R (1955) Scholastic economics: survival and lasting influence from the sixteenth century to Adam Smith. Quart J Econ 69(2):161–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stein P (1999) Roman law in European history. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elegido JM (2009) The just price: three insights from the Salamanca school. J Bus Ethics 90(1):29–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Molina L de (1981) La Teoría del Justo Precio, edition prepared and with an Introduction by Camacho FG. Editora Nacional, MadridGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Madigan P (2011) Review of “The Salamanca school”. Heythrop J 52(1):133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schumpeter J (1994) History of economic analysis. Routledge, London, p 57Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    de Soto JH (2006) Money, bank credit, and economic cycles. Ludwig von Mises Institute, AuburnGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mariana J de (2007) Treatise on the alteration of money (the original edition is from 1609). In: Grabill SJ (ed) Sourcebook in late-scholastic monetary theory. Lexington Books, Lanham, pp 247–341Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Höpfl H (2004) Jesuit political thought: The Society of Jesus and the State, c. 1540–1630. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brett AS (1997) Liberty, right and nature: individual rights in later scholastic thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 132–134Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vicente LP (1957) Diego de Covarrubias y Leyva, Maestro de Derecho Internacional. Asociación Francisco de Vitoria, MadridGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Scott JB (1934) The Spanish origin of international law: Francisco De Vitoria and his law of nations. Humphrey Milford, London, There is a 2000 reprint by The Lawbook ExchangeGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hanke L (2002) The Spanish struggle for justice in the conquest of América, with previously unpublished personal and professional reminiscence by the author and an Introduction by Susan Scafidi and Peter Bakewell. Southern Methodist University Press, DallasGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Losada A (1971) The controversy between Sepúlveda and Las Casas in the Junta of Valladolid. In: Friede J, Keen B (eds) Bartlomé de las Casas in history: toward an understanding of the man and his work. Northern Illinois University Press, DeKalb, pp 279–306Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hanke L (1994) All mankind is one: a study of the disputation between Bartolomé de Las Casas and Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda in 1550 on the intellectual and religious capacity of the American Indians. Northern Illinois University Press, DeKalbGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social, Political and Territorial SciencesGOVCOPP – University of AveiroAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations