Advertisement

Abstract

When managerial decisions are examined, somehow the business context must be included in the analysis. In this chapter, causalities that transcend individuals are promoted as unit of analysis in empirical moral research, namely, discourse. Studying managerial decisions in their discursive context is an interesting way to study the moral side of these decisions. After discussing discourse theory, the conclusion is that discourse theory can help business ethics in many different ways. It is shown what a discourse description or analysis within business ethics could look like. Special attention is paid to stories and metaphors, and to the power effects of international anticorruption discourses.

Keywords

Anticorruption discourse Corruption Discourse analysis Discourse ethics Discourse Genealogy Tractable morality 

References

  1. 1.
    De Graaf G, Hoenderboom M, Wagenaar P (2010) Constructing corruption. In: De Graaf G, von Maravic P, Wagenaar P (eds) The good cause: theoretical perspectives on corruption. Budrich Publishing, Opladen, pp 98–114Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Graaf G (2006) Discourse and descriptive business ethics. Bus Ethics: A Eur Rev 13(3):247–258Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Graaf G (2003) Tractable morality. Customer discourses of bankers, veterinarians and charity workers. Schouten en Nelissen, ZaltbommelGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Luik H (1989) Bedrijfsethiek: Ter Kennismaking. In: Brand A, Kimman E, van Luijk H, Wempe J (eds) Bedrijfsethiek in Nederland. Het Spectrum, Utrecht, pp 12–30Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kimman E (1991) Organisatie-ethiek. Van Gorcum, AssenGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ten Bos R (1998) Merkwaardige moraal: Goed en Kwaad in Managementtheorie en Praktijk. Schouten en NelissenGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    French P (1984) Collective and corporate responsibility. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Solomon R (1992) Ethics and excelence: cooperation and integrity in business. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaptein M, Wempe J (2002) The balanced company. A theory of corporate integrity. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Green R (1994) The ethical manager. A new method for business ethics. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sorell T (1998) Beyond the fringe? The strange state of business ethics. In: Parker M (ed) Ethics and Organizations. Sage Publications, London, pp 15–29Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Donaldson T, Dunfee T (2000) Ties that bind: a social contract approach to business ethics. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van Willigenburg T (2003) Rethinking organisational ethics: a plea for pluralism. In: European business ethics network. Sellwyn College, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Velasquez M (1988) Business ethics. Concepts and cases. Prentice-Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bauman Z (1993) Postmodern ethics. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hajer M (1995) The politics of environmental discourse. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eeten Mv (1998) Dialogues of the deaf: defining new agendas for environmental deadlocks. Eburon, DelftGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hoffmaster B (1992) Can ethnography save the life of medical ethics? Soc Sci Med 35(12):1421–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stark A (1993) What is wrong with business ethics? Harv Bus Rev 71(1):38–48Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Frohock F (1986) Special care. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Du Gay P (1996) Consumption and identity at work. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Putnam L (2000) Work-views and work-views: building theory about discourse and organizations. In: Combes C (ed) Organizational discourse: word-views, work-views and world-views. KMPC, London, p 255Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Alvesson M, Karreman D (2000) Taking the linguistic turn in organizational research, challenges, responses, consenqueces. J Appl Behav Sci 36(2):136–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Phillips N, Hardy C (2002) Discourse analysis, investigating processes of social construction. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Foucault M (1977) Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Vintage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    de Graaf G (2001) Business ethics and discourse theory: the case of bankers’ conceptualizations of customers. J Bus Ethics 31(4):299–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wildavsky A (1987) Speaking truth to power: the art and craft of policy analysis. Transaction Publishers, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rochefort DRCE (1994) The politics of problem definition: shaping the policy agenda. University Press of Kansas, LawrenceGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kingdon J (1995) Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schön D, Rein M (1993) Reframing policy discourse. In: Fischer F, Forester J (eds) The argumentative turn on policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press, Durham, pp 145–166Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Putnam L, Fairhurst G (2001) Discourse analysis in organizations. In: Fredric J, Putnam L (eds) The new handbook of organizational communication: advances in theory, research and methods. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dijk Tv (1985) Handbook of discourse analysis (4 vols. I. Disciplines of discourse. II. Dimensions of discourse. III. Discourse and dialogue. IV. Discourse analysis in society). Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Titscher S et al (2000) Methods of text and discourse analysis. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Parker M (1998) Against ethics. In: Parker M (ed) Ethics and organizations. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shapiro M (1992) Reading the postmodern polity. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cheney G, Christensen L (2001) Organizational identity. Linkages between internal and external communication. In: Jablin F, Putnam L (eds) The new handbook of organizational communication: advances in theory, research and methods. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jackall R (1988) Moral mazes. The world of corporate managers. Oxford University Press, New York, p 249Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bird F, Waters J (1989) The moral muteness of managers. Calif Manage Rev 32(1):73–88Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kunda G (1992) Engineering culture. Temple University Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schön D, Rein M (1994) Frame reflection: toward the resolution of intractable policy. MIT Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Twist Mv (1994) Verbale Vernieuwing. Aantekeningen over de Kunst van Bestuurskunde. Vuga, Den HaagGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hackley C, Kitchen P (1999) Ethical perspectives on the postmodern communications leviathan. J Bus Ethics 20(1):15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hawkes T (1998) Scoring an own goal? Ethical issues in the UK professional soccer business. Bus Ethics: A Eur Rev 1(1):37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    de Graaf G (2005) Tractable morality. J Bus Ethics 60:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Dewey J (1948) Reconstruction and philosophy. Beacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    de Graaf G (2007) Causes of corruption: towards a contextual theory of corruption. Public Admin Q 31(1):39–86Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bourdieu P (1977) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 248Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bourdieu P, Wacquant LJD (1992) An invitation to reflexive sociology. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bourdieu P (1990) The logic of practice. Polity Press, Cambridge, p 333Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bourdieu P (1998) Practical reason. Polity Press, Cambridge, p 153Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mauws M (2000) But is it art? Decision making and discursive recourses in the field of cultural production. J Appl Behav Sci 36(2):229–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    de Graaf G (2005) Veterinarians’ discourses on animals and clients, J Agric Environ Ethics (1.321; 10/38), 18, 6:557–578Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Van Exel NJA, de Graaf G, Rietveld P (2005) Getting from A to B: operant approaches to travel decision making inert or reasoned? Operant Subj 27(4):194–216Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Watson T (1994) In search of management. Routledge, PadstowGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Johnson M (1993) The moral imagination. University Press of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    McIntyre A (1991) After virtue. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre DameGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    O’Connor S (1997) Telling decisions: the role of narrative in organizational decision making. In: Shapira Z (ed) Organizational decision making. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 304–323Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Fisher W (1987) Human communication as narration: toward a philosophy of reason, value and action. University of South Carolina Press, ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Roe E (1994) Narrative policy analysis: theory and practice. Duke University, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Boje D (1991) The storytelling organization: a study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Adm Sci Q 36(1):106–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Boje D (1995) Stories of the storytelling organization: a postmodern analysis of Disney as “Tamara-Land”. Acad Manage J 38(4):997–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    White H (1980) The value of narrativity in the representation of reality. Critical Inquiry 7(1):5–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ettema J, Glasser T (1988) Narrative form and moral force: the realization of innocence and guilt through investigative journalism. J Commun 38(3):8–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Bracking SL (2009) Political economies of corruption beyond liberalism: an interpretative view of Zimbabwe. Singap J Trop Geogr 30:35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    O’Connor E (2000) Plotting the organization: the embedded narrative as a construct for studying organizational change. J Appl Behav Sci 36(2):174–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    O’Connor E (1995) Paradoxes of participation: textual analysis and organizational change. Organization Stud 16(5):769–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    O’Connor E (1997) Telling decisions: the role of narrative in organizational decision making. In: Shapira Z (ed) Organizational decision making. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Weick K (1979) The social psychology of organizing. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Willmott H (1998) Towards a new ethics; the contributions of poststructuralism and posthumanism. In: Parker M (ed) Ethics and organizations. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 76–121Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Foucault M (1984) The Foucault reader. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Roberts SM, Wright S, O’Neill P (2007) Good governance in the Pacific? Ambivilence and Possibility. Geoforum 38:867–984Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Brown E, Cloke J (2006) The critical business of corruption. Crit Persp Int Bus 2(4):275–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Hanlon J (2004) Do donors promote corruption? The case of Mozambique. Third World Q 25(4):747–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Harrison E (2003) Unpacking the anti-corruption agenda: dilemmas for anthropologists. In: Workshop on order and disjuncture: the organisation of aid and development. SOASGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Polzer T (2001) Corruption: deconstructing the World Bank discourse. Working Paper No. 18: London School of Economics and Political Science, LondonGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Szeftel M (1998) Misunderstanding African politics: corruption and the governance agenda. Rev Afr Political Econ 76:221–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Williams J, Beare M (1999) The business of bribery: globalization, economic liberalization and the problem’ of corruption. Crime, Law Social Change 32:115–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Michael B (2004) Explaining organisational change in international development: the role of complexity in anti-corruption work. J Int Dev 16(8):1067–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Brown E, Cloke J (2004) Neoliberal reform, governance and corruption in the south: assessing the international anti-corruption crusade. Antipode 36(2):272–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Brown E, Cloke J (2007) Shadow Europe: alternative European financial geographies. Growth Change 38(2):304–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Le Billon P (2005) Corruption, reconstruction and oil governance in Iraq. Third World Q 26(4–5):685–703Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Szeftel M (1998) Misunderstanding African politics: corruption and the governance agenda. Rev Afr Political Econ 25(76):221–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Marquette H (2003) Corruption, politics and development: the origins and development of the third world bank’s anti-corruption agenda. Palgrave, BasinstokeGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Brown E, Cloke J (2005) Neoliberal reform, governance and corruption in Central America: exploring the Nicaraguan case. Political Geography 24:601–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Kondos A (1987) The question of “corruption” in Nepal. Mankind 17(1):15–29Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Gupta A (1995) Blurred boundaries: the discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state. Am Ethnologist 22(2):375–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Whyte D (2007) The crimes of neo-liberal rule in occupied Iraq. Br J Criminol 47:177–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    MacLennan C (2005) Corruption in corporate America: Enron before and after. In: Corruption: anthropological perspectives. Pluto, London, pp 156–170Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Watson T (2003) Ethical choice in managerial work: The scope for moral choices in an ethically irrational world. Human Relations 56(2):167–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Schermer M (2001) The Different Faces of Autonomy (proefschrift Faculteit Geneeskunde Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Social SciencesVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations