Advertisement

The Idea of a Contractarian Business Ethics

  • Christoph LuetgeEmail author

Abstract

This chapter discusses two major approaches to business ethics which rest on the foundation of social contract theory: the contractualist position of Integrative Social Contracts Theory (ISCT) and the contractarian position of Order Ethics. Both are summarized and analyzed critically. It turns out that Order Ethics might remedy some defects of ISCT.

Keywords

Order ethics Social contract Buchanan Self-interest Contractarianism Business ethics 

References

  1. 1.
    Appiah KA (2008) Experiments in ethics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Becker GS (1993) Nobel lecture: the economic way of looking at behavior. J Pol Econ 101(3):358–409Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Binmore K (1994) Game theory and the social contract, vol 1, Playing fair. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Binmore K (1998) Game theory and the social contract, vol 2, Just playing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Binmore K (2005) Natural justice. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boatright J (1999) Presidential address: does business ethics rest on a mistake? Bus Ethics Q 9:583–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boatright J (2007) Is there an internal morality of contracting? Acad Manage Rev 32:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brennan G, Buchanan JM (1985) The reason of rules. Constitutional political economy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buchanan JM (1975) The limits of liberty. Between anarchy and Leviathan. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crane A et al (eds) (2009) The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    de Graaf G (2006) The autonomy of the contracting partners. An argument for heuristic contractarian business ethics. J Bus Ethics 68(3):347–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Donaldson T, Dunfee TW (1995) Integrative social contracts theory. A communitarian conception of economic ethics. Econ Philos 11(1):85–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Donaldson T, Dunfee TW (1999) Ties that bind. A social contracts approach to business ethics. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hands W (1994) The sociology of scientific knowledge. Some thoughts on the possibilities. In: Backhouse R (ed) New directions in economic methodology. Routledge, London, pp 75–106Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hart OD (1987) Incomplete contracts. In: Eatwell J et al (eds) The New Palgrave. A dictionary of economics, vol 2. Macmillan, London, pp 752–759Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hart OD, Holmström BR (1987) The theory of contracts, Ch 3. In: Bewley TF (ed) Advances in economic theory. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    von Hayek FA (1978) Competition as a discovery procedure. In: von Hayek FA (ed) New studies in philosophy, politics and economics. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Heath J et al (2010) Business ethics and (or as) political philosophy. Bus Ethics Q 20(3):427–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Heugens P, Kaptein M, van Oosterhout H (2004) Ties that grind? Corroborating a typology of social contracting problems. J Bus Ethics 49(3):235–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heugens P, van Oosterhout H, Kaptein M (2006) Foundations and applications for contractualist business ethics. J Bus Ethics 68(3):211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Homann K, Koslowski P, Luetge C (eds) (2007) Globalisation and business ethics. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Homann K, Luetge C (2004) Einführung in die Wirtschaftsethik. LIT, MünsterGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kitcher P (1993) The advancement of science. Science without legend, objectivity without illusions. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    List C, Pettit P (2011) Group agency. The possibility, design, and status of corporate agents. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Luetge C (2005) Economic ethics, business ethics, and the idea of mutual advantages. Bus Ethics Eur Rev 14(2):108–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Luetge C (2006) An economic rationale for a work and savings ethic? J. Buchanan’s late works and business ethics. J Bus Ethics 66(1):43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Luetge C (2007) Was hält eine Gesellschaft zusammen? Ethik im Zeitalter der Globalisierung. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Luetge C (2012) Economic ethics. In: Chadwick R (ed) Encyclopedia of applied ethics, vol 4. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    McCloskey D (2006) The bourgeois virtues. Ethics for an age of commerce. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    McCloskey D (2010) Bourgeois dignity. Why economics can’t explain the modern world. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    van Oosterhout H, Heugens P (2009) Extant social contracts in global business regulation. Outline of a research agenda. J Bus Ethics 88(4):729–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    van Oosterhout H, Heugens P, Kaptein M (2007) Contractualism vindicated. A response to Boatright. Acad Manage Rev 32(1):295–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    van Oosterhout H, Wempe B, van Willigenburg T (2004) Contractualism and the project for an integrative organizational ethics. In: Welcomer S (ed) IABS Proceedings the fifteenth annual conference, Jackson Hole, WyomingGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pies I, Hielscher S, Beckmann M (2009) Moral commitments and the societal role of business. An ordonomic approach to corporate citizenship. Bus Ethics Q 19(3):375–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Singer P (2005) Ethics and intuitions. J Ethics 9:331–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Smith A, Campbell R, Skinner A (eds) (1776/1976) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Thurow LC (1980) The zero-sum society. Distribution and the possibilities for economic change. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wempe B (2004) On the use of the social contract model in business ethics. Bus Ethics Eur Rev 13(4):332–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wempe B (2005) In defense of a self-disciplined, domain-specific social contract theory of business ethics. Bus Ethics Q 15(1):113–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wempe B (2008) Four design criteria for any future contractarian theory of business ethics. J Bus Ethics 81(3):697–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wempe B (2009) Extant social contracts and the question of business ethics. J Bus Ethics 88(4):741–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Peter Löscher Chair of Business EthicsTechnische Universität MünchenMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations