Skip to main content

The Idea of a Contractarian Business Ethics

  • Reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter discusses two major approaches to business ethics which rest on the foundation of social contract theory: the contractualist position of Integrative Social Contracts Theory (ISCT) and the contractarian position of Order Ethics. Both are summarized and analyzed critically. It turns out that Order Ethics might remedy some defects of ISCT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  1. Appiah KA (2008) Experiments in ethics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Becker GS (1993) Nobel lecture: the economic way of looking at behavior. J Pol Econ 101(3):358–409

    Google Scholar 

  4. Binmore K (1994) Game theory and the social contract, vol 1, Playing fair. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Binmore K (1998) Game theory and the social contract, vol 2, Just playing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/London

    Google Scholar 

  6. Binmore K (2005) Natural justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Boatright J (1999) Presidential address: does business ethics rest on a mistake? Bus Ethics Q 9:583–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boatright J (2007) Is there an internal morality of contracting? Acad Manage Rev 32:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brennan G, Buchanan JM (1985) The reason of rules. Constitutional political economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buchanan JM (1975) The limits of liberty. Between anarchy and Leviathan. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  11. Crane A et al (eds) (2009) The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  12. de Graaf G (2006) The autonomy of the contracting partners. An argument for heuristic contractarian business ethics. J Bus Ethics 68(3):347–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Donaldson T, Dunfee TW (1995) Integrative social contracts theory. A communitarian conception of economic ethics. Econ Philos 11(1):85–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Donaldson T, Dunfee TW (1999) Ties that bind. A social contracts approach to business ethics. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hands W (1994) The sociology of scientific knowledge. Some thoughts on the possibilities. In: Backhouse R (ed) New directions in economic methodology. Routledge, London, pp 75–106

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hart OD (1987) Incomplete contracts. In: Eatwell J et al (eds) The New Palgrave. A dictionary of economics, vol 2. Macmillan, London, pp 752–759

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hart OD, Holmström BR (1987) The theory of contracts, Ch 3. In: Bewley TF (ed) Advances in economic theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  18. von Hayek FA (1978) Competition as a discovery procedure. In: von Hayek FA (ed) New studies in philosophy, politics and economics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heath J et al (2010) Business ethics and (or as) political philosophy. Bus Ethics Q 20(3):427–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Heugens P, Kaptein M, van Oosterhout H (2004) Ties that grind? Corroborating a typology of social contracting problems. J Bus Ethics 49(3):235–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Heugens P, van Oosterhout H, Kaptein M (2006) Foundations and applications for contractualist business ethics. J Bus Ethics 68(3):211–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Homann K, Koslowski P, Luetge C (eds) (2007) Globalisation and business ethics. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  23. Homann K, Luetge C (2004) Einführung in die Wirtschaftsethik. LIT, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kitcher P (1993) The advancement of science. Science without legend, objectivity without illusions. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  25. List C, Pettit P (2011) Group agency. The possibility, design, and status of corporate agents. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  26. Luetge C (2005) Economic ethics, business ethics, and the idea of mutual advantages. Bus Ethics Eur Rev 14(2):108–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Luetge C (2006) An economic rationale for a work and savings ethic? J. Buchanan’s late works and business ethics. J Bus Ethics 66(1):43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Luetge C (2007) Was hält eine Gesellschaft zusammen? Ethik im Zeitalter der Globalisierung. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  29. Luetge C (2012) Economic ethics. In: Chadwick R (ed) Encyclopedia of applied ethics, vol 4. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  30. McCloskey D (2006) The bourgeois virtues. Ethics for an age of commerce. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  31. McCloskey D (2010) Bourgeois dignity. Why economics can’t explain the modern world. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  32. van Oosterhout H, Heugens P (2009) Extant social contracts in global business regulation. Outline of a research agenda. J Bus Ethics 88(4):729–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. van Oosterhout H, Heugens P, Kaptein M (2007) Contractualism vindicated. A response to Boatright. Acad Manage Rev 32(1):295–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. van Oosterhout H, Wempe B, van Willigenburg T (2004) Contractualism and the project for an integrative organizational ethics. In: Welcomer S (ed) IABS Proceedings the fifteenth annual conference, Jackson Hole, Wyoming

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pies I, Hielscher S, Beckmann M (2009) Moral commitments and the societal role of business. An ordonomic approach to corporate citizenship. Bus Ethics Q 19(3):375–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Singer P (2005) Ethics and intuitions. J Ethics 9:331–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Smith A, Campbell R, Skinner A (eds) (1776/1976) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  38. Thurow LC (1980) The zero-sum society. Distribution and the possibilities for economic change. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wempe B (2004) On the use of the social contract model in business ethics. Bus Ethics Eur Rev 13(4):332–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wempe B (2005) In defense of a self-disciplined, domain-specific social contract theory of business ethics. Bus Ethics Q 15(1):113–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wempe B (2008) Four design criteria for any future contractarian theory of business ethics. J Bus Ethics 81(3):697–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wempe B (2009) Extant social contracts and the question of business ethics. J Bus Ethics 88(4):741–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Luetge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Luetge, C. (2013). The Idea of a Contractarian Business Ethics. In: Luetge, C. (eds) Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1494-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1494-6_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1493-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1494-6

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics